Аудит источников
Видео и извлечённые правила
Ссылки, статус обработки и сохранённые знания — в одном списке.
Список видео
Раскройте видео, чтобы увидеть ссылку, прогресс, артефакты и перечисленные правила.
Показано 250 из 250
Чек-рейз – непобедимая имба в покере? Принцип защиты от рейзов. #покер #poker #обучение #pokerok Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 10
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
turn_checkraise_is_strength_default_fold
Default to folding: a turn check-raise is almost always strength (few bluffs, many two-pair/sets/straights).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: facing a turn check-raise with a strong-but-not-nut hand
Условие: You barreled the turn with TPTK or a strong overpair and got check-raised.
Обоснование автора: Turn check-raise ranges are value-heavy with very few bluffs, so strong-but-not-nut hands are bluff-catchers with nothing to catch.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Defending against turn check-raises
-
fold_when_obvious_draw_completed
Fold immediately: the check-raise holds the made draws and you block little.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: condition 1 to fold the turn check-raise
Условие: An obvious draw (straight/flush card) completed on the turn.
Обоснование автора: A draw-completing turn fills the check-raiser's draws, making it pure value.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Defending against turn check-raises
-
fold_when_checkraise_is_large
Fold immediately: big check-raise sizing = almost no bluffs, slow-played monsters.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: condition 2 to fold the turn check-raise
Условие: The turn check-raise is large (even on a blank turn).
Обоснование автора: The bigger the check-raise, the more it is uncapped value with no bluffs.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Defending against turn check-raises
-
fold_vs_reg_or_unknown_turn_checkraise
Fold: regs and unknowns under-bluff turn check-raises; treat unknowns as non-bluffing (you are unknown to them too).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: condition 3 to fold the turn check-raise
Условие: Opponent is an average reg (<= NL1k) or an unknown player.
Обоснование автора: Population/unknown turn check-raises are under-bluffed; the line looks too strong to attack.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Defending against turn check-raises
-
any_one_condition_means_fold_turn_now
Fold the turn now — do not call and fold the river. One condition is enough.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: combining the three fold conditions
Условие: Any ONE of: a draw completed, the check-raise is large, or the opponent is a reg/unknown.
Обоснование автора: Calling to fold later just burns money when any single fold-condition holds.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Defending against turn check-raises
-
call_turn_fold_river_when_checkraise_small
Call the turn, then fold to a river jam/big bet; continue once on the cheap raise.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: when you can flat the turn check-raise
Условие: The turn check-raise is small (~pot or less).
Обоснование автора: A small raise leaves room to continue once and give up to further pressure.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Defending against turn check-raises
-
call_turn_vs_fish_overplay_or_info_raise
Call the turn (vs a short stack even get it in); they can have worse. Fold the river if aggression continues with a full stack.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: flatting the turn vs amateurs
Условие: Opponent is a fish/amateur who overplays hands or 'raises for information'.
Обоснование автора: Amateurs check-raise too wide (overplay, info raises), so a flat (or stack-off vs short) beats their range.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Defending against turn check-raises
-
call_turn_fold_river_vs_one_shot_bluffer
Call the turn check-raise, fold the river: they bluff once, cheaply, and give up later.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: vs a one-and-done ('one-shot shotgun') player
Условие: Opponent uses unfinished bluff lines (high flop/turn aggression, collapsing river aggression, high WWSF).
Обоснование автора: One-and-done bluffers fire once; calling the turn catches that bluff, the river fold avoids paying value.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Defending against turn check-raises
-
calldown_exception_needs_two_conditions
Only then call down (turn check-raise + river). Both conditions are required, not one.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: rare exception: call turn check-raise AND river
Условие: Both: a hyper-aggressive finished-bluff-line opponent, AND a runout where few draws complete and there are relatively few value combos.
Обоснование автора: A finished-bluff-line villain on a low-value, no-draw-completing runout has enough bluffs to call down.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Defending against turn check-raises
-
semibluff_checkraise_vs_capped_field
Semibluff check-raise: a flop check-around caps the field, so a turn check-raise attacks capped ranges, denies equity, and has implied odds when it hits.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: (check-raiser side) semibluff check-raising a capped field
Условие: Everyone checked the flop (ranges capped); a turn overcard/card arrives and the bettor's range is uncapped draws/weak pairs.
Обоснование автора: Capped opponents (they'd have bet strong hands) cannot defend a turn check-raise well; Malinovsky's 8-7 check-raise hit a straight.
Review: trainer_candidate
КК в покере и опять ТУЗ на флопе!? ЧЕК в 3бет поте или БЕТ? Игра с 2-ой парой #покер #poker #тритон Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 10
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
pocket_pair_overcard_ip_3bp_default_small_cbet
Default to a small c-bet (~1/3, a range bet), not a check: deny equity, burn his realization/bluff equity, keep initiative, do not cap, and pick the river price.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: pocket pair (TT/JJ/QQ) IP in a 3-bet pot, an overcard flops (now 2nd/under-pair), villain checks
Условие: You 3-bet a pocket pair IP; the flop brings an overcard so you hold an underpair / second pair; villain checks.
Обоснование автора: Worse hands (8x/9x/weak Tx) pay a small bet, you deny ~20-25% equity, keep initiative and stay uncapped; check-check later if the turn is bad.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: C-bet missed / medium hands in position in 3-bet pots
-
no_reason_to_bet_heuristic_outdated_pocketpair
Do not auto-check; the small IP bet has equity-denial + initiative value the old reason-to-bet frame ignores.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the 'no clear value, no semibluff -> check' intuition with a medium pocket pair
Условие: Underpair/second pair IP with no clean value bet and no real semi-bluff.
Обоснование автора: Same outdated heuristic as with ace-high: a small IP bet is good even without classic value/semibluff.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: C-bet missed / medium hands in position in 3-bet pots
-
checking_ip_caps_range_pocketpair
Avoid capping: checking announces no strong hand and invites pressure; betting keeps you uncapped and able to barrel credibly.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: capping your range by checking back the medium pocket pair
Условие: You check back IP on a board where you bet all your strong hands (AQ+/sets/AK).
Обоснование автора: On Q-T-7 you bet top pair+/sets, so checking caps you to weak hands and lets villain thin-value and bluff you.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: C-bet missed / medium hands in position in 3-bet pots
-
cbet_downside_is_getting_checkraised
Weigh the check-raise risk: a raise turns your medium hand into a tough spot (burn equity or pay value).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the main cost of c-betting a medium made hand
Условие: You small-c-bet an underpair/second pair and can be check-raised.
Обоснование автора: The downside of the c-bet is the check-raise; against ranges with many sets/two-pair you fold the medium hand to it.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: C-bet missed / medium hands in position in 3-bet pots
-
cbet_plus_ev_when_pool_rarely_checkraises
C-bet small and fold to the rare check-raise: the c-bet is clearly +EV when the pool under-check-raises.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: pool/exploit condition for the small c-bet
Условие: At the stakes you actually play (online NL2-NL200, cheap MTTs), villains rarely check-raise and their check-call range has worse hands.
Обоснование автора: The check-raise problem mostly exists high-stakes / vs maniacs; in normal pools the small c-bet prints and the rare raise is an easy fold.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: C-bet missed / medium hands in position in 3-bet pots
-
check_more_vs_checkraise_happy_pool_or_maniac
Check more for pot control to avoid burning equity to raises; this is the exception to the default c-bet.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: when to check the medium pocket pair instead
Условие: Against a specific check-raise-happy maniac, or a pool/meta where opponents check-raise a lot.
Обоснование автора: If villains raise often, c-betting a medium hand just gets it raised off its equity; check to control the pot.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: C-bet missed / medium hands in position in 3-bet pots
-
live_deep_rakefree_3bet_call_ranges_are_wide
Expect villains to call 3-bets OOP far wider (suited aces, suited connectors, suited kings, many pairs) than online — adjust your range reads and value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: range read in live high-stakes deep rake-free games
Условие: Live high-stakes, deep, rake-free games (e.g. Triton).
Обоснование автора: No rake + deep stacks make wide OOP 3-bet-calls profitable, unlike narrow online ranges.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: C-bet missed / medium hands in position in 3-bet pots
-
call_checkraise_with_second_pair_plus_draw
Call the check-raise: with ~47% equity vs a range of sets/two-pair/top-pair/semibluffs you cannot fold the flop.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: facing a flop check-raise with second pair + a draw
Условие: Your underpair/second pair also has a straight draw + backdoor FD (e.g. JJ with OESD/gutshot ~47% vs the raise range).
Обоснование автора: Pair-plus-draw has enough equity vs the raise range that folding the flop is wrong.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching finished bluff lines / aggressive opponents
-
turn_thin_call_on_small_sizing
A thin continue can be okay on price (you still beat some semibluffs / have a few outs); marginal, profile-dependent.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: turn where the overcard tanks your equity but the bet is tiny
Условие: An overcard turn drops you to ~31% but villain bets very small (~1/4 pot, good price).
Обоснование автора: Tiny sizing + some bluffs/outs makes a thin call playable even at 31%, but it is close.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching finished bluff lines / aggressive opponents
-
river_hero_call_third_pair_is_the_leak
Fold: the call is only good if villain bluffs almost everything; vs a low-bluff range it is -EV. Online you would have folded the flop check-raise or the turn.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: river: hero-calling third pair into a strong low-bluff range
Условие: River, you hold third pair (e.g. JJ after Q then A), villain bets/overbets a strong value-heavy range with few bluffs.
Обоснование автора: Villain shows a set (777) played straightforwardly; the hero-call burns money vs a range with little bluff.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching finished bluff lines / aggressive opponents
Агрессия. Маньяк оставил Покер Про без штанов с АК. Как сыграть без пары? #покер #poker #обучение Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 11
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
ak_no_hit_ip_3bp_cbet_not_check
C-bet small (~1/3), do NOT check — vs both regs and fish in 3-bet pots in position.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: AK with no pair, in position, 3-bet pot, villain checks
Условие: You hold AK (ace-high, no pair) in position in a 3-bet pot and villain checks the flop.
Обоснование автора: Even with no value and no fold-out-better, betting IP burns villain's bluff equity, keeps initiative, does not cap your range, lets you pick the river price, and folds out worse hands with live outs.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: C-bet missed / medium hands in position in 3-bet pots
-
no_reason_to_bet_heuristic_is_outdated
Do not default to check just because there is 'no reason to bet'; solver-era betting IP captures value the old heuristic misses.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the 'no reason to bet so check' heuristic
Условие: You have ace-high IP with no value bet and no classic semi-bluff.
Обоснование автора: The old 'reason-to-bet' frame (value or semibluff only) is outdated; a small IP bet has equity-denial and initiative value on its own.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: C-bet missed / medium hands in position in 3-bet pots
-
checking_ip_caps_your_range
Avoid capping: betting keeps strong hands in your line so you can credibly barrel later; checking signals weak/controlled value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: capping your range by checking IP
Условие: You check back IP in a 3-bet pot on a board where you bet all your strong hands.
Обоснование автора: Checking IP announces no strong hands (you bet them), making you easy to play against and unable to represent strength later.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: C-bet missed / medium hands in position in 3-bet pots
-
finished_vs_unfinished_bluff_lines
Classify: finished bluff line = bluff taken to the river (triple barrel / check-raise then barrel); unfinished = one- or two-and-done. Maniacs use finished lines.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: classifying opponents by bluff-line completion
Условие: Reading an opponent's barreling tendencies.
Обоснование автора: A fundamental behavioral pattern: whether a player completes bluffs to showdown drives how you must respond.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching finished bluff lines / aggressive opponents
-
detect_finished_bluff_line_by_stats
Flag finished-bluff-line players by high AND flat aggression across streets (e.g. 45/36/33), high c-bet flop/turn/river (75/65/75), high WWSF (~48-52%), low won-at-showdown.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: identifying a finished-bluff-line opponent
Условие: You have reads or HUD stats on the opponent.
Обоснование автора: Finished bluffers show smeared, non-collapsing aggression across streets; unfinished bluffers' aggression drops sharply on a later street.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching finished bluff lines / aggressive opponents
-
vs_finished_bluffer_calldown_or_giveup
Either call down to the river (finished bluff-catch) OR give up on the flop. Never call-then-fold midway — anything in between burns money.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: responding to a finished-bluff-line / maniac opponent
Условие: Facing an opponent who completes bluffs to the river (maniac / over-barreler).
Обоснование автора: Since he always fires the river, half-measures (call flop, fold turn/river) just pay a bluff that keeps coming; pick all-streets or none.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching finished bluff lines / aggressive opponents
-
pick_bluffcatchers_from_the_flop
Pick hands you can hold for three streets: high second pair (9+) or top pair, that rarely get outdrawn — not ace-high.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: choosing which hands bluff-catch a finished bluffer
Условие: Deciding from the flop which hands will call down a finished-bluff-line opponent.
Обоснование автора: A 3-street bluff-catch needs a hand that stays good; ace-high has too few outs and poor showdown to call three barrels.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching finished bluff lines / aggressive opponents
-
turn_weakest_calls_into_checkraise_bluffs
Optionally turn the bottom of your calling range into check-raise bluffs against the over-barreler.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: option: raise instead of weak-call vs over-barreler
Условие: Your weakest would-be calls will just get blown off by repeated barrels.
Обоснование автора: Hands that can't profitably call three barrels are better as check-raise bluffs than as money-burning calls.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching finished bluff lines / aggressive opponents
-
call_scare_cards_vs_aggressive_when_committed
Keep calling on classic scare cards: they raise his value combos but he also bluffs them more and stops value-betting weak top pairs.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: continuing on scare cards once committed to call down
Условие: You committed to bluff-catching an aggressive opponent and an overcard or flush-completing card arrives.
Обоснование автора: Overcards/flush cards both add value and add bluffs (and remove his thin value-bets), so a committed bluff-catch keeps calling.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching finished bluff lines / aggressive opponents
-
exception_fold_nonobvious_cards_completing_hidden_straights
Deviate and fold here: these runouts add value combos with no offsetting drop and are hard to read, so the bluff-catch turns -EV.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: exception to call-down: non-obvious completing cards
Условие: A non-obvious card completes hidden straights (gutshots/OESD) or backdoor flushes, increasing villain's value WITHOUT reducing it.
Обоснование автора: Unlike obvious scare cards, hidden-straight/backdoor completions only add value (he keeps value-betting and gains made hands), dropping your equity below the call threshold.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching finished bluff lines / aggressive opponents
-
concrete_ak_998_call_vs_maniac_6_runout
The river 6 is a non-obvious value-completing card -> fold; calling here is the leak. (Bet flop was correct; call-down was the right idea on most rivers, but not this one.)
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: AK on 9-9-8, IP 3bp vs maniac, river 6 overbet
Условие: 3-bet pot, AK IP on 9-9-8, c-bet flop, villain donk-bets turn 8, river 6 overbet (the 6 completes hidden straights; equity ~43%->36%).
Обоснование автора: The 6 completes 75/107-type hidden straights and 86 (villain shows 86 full house); hero's equity drops ~10% below the overbet call threshold.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching finished bluff lines / aggressive opponents
Боль! АК мимо флопа в покере. Как сыграть правильно? Лимп-3бет, полярный спектр. #покер #poker Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 12
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
vs_polarized_call_more_when_you_dont_beat_value
Call rather than raise/jam: raising only isolates you against the stronger part and folds out the bluffs you already beat.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: facing a polarized range; hero beats little of villain's value
Условие: Villain's range is polarized (strong hands + bluffs, thin middle) and your hand beats little of the value side.
Обоснование автора: Against a polar range you are either far behind value or far ahead of bluffs; raising loses the bluffs and gets called only by better — so just call.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Playing against polarized ranges
-
vs_polarized_push_when_many_worse
Push / raise for value: you get called by worse and fold out bluffs you profit from.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: facing a polarized range that still contains many worse hands
Условие: Villain's polarized range contains many hands worse than yours (e.g. an overplaying fish, or a wide BTN 4-bet).
Обоснование автора: When the polar range's value side is full of worse hands, raising extracts value and realizes fold equity.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Playing against polarized ranges
-
big_sizing_signals_polarization
Treat big sizings as a signal of a polarized range and respond by calling more (unless you beat much of the value).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: reading polarization from sizing
Условие: Villain uses a big action: check-raise, 3-bet/4-bet, large bet or overbet.
Обоснование автора: Polar ranges express through big sizings (check-raise / 3-4-bet / overbet); the sizing itself tells you the range shape.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Playing against polarized ranges
-
dont_raise_bluffcatcher_into_polarized
Do not re-raise: call. Raising isolates you against only stronger hands and folds out his bluffs you want to keep in.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: medium made hand facing a polarized check-raise from a reg
Условие: You hold a bluff-catcher (e.g. an overpair like QQ) and a solid reg check-raises on a draw-heavy board.
Обоснование автора: Your overpair is a bluff-catcher vs a polar check-raise; re-raising only gets called by better and loses his bluffs.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Playing against polarized ranges
-
jam_overpair_vs_fish_polar_value_heavy
Jam / get it in: against a fish the value side is full of worse hands you beat.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: overpair vs a short-stacked fish who check-raises
Условие: A short-stacked fish check-raises; his polar range over-values worse hands (any top pair, weak draws).
Обоснование автора: Fish over-play top pairs and draws, so their 'strong' side contains many worse hands — value-jam.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Playing against polarized ranges
-
limp_three_bet_is_polarized
Read it as polarized: stack-off hands + trash bluffs; good-but-not-great hands (KQs/KTs) would limp-call instead. Mostly just flat strong hands rather than 4-bet-jam light.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: facing a limp-3-bet preflop
Условие: Villain limps then re-raises big (limp-3-bet).
Обоснование автора: Limp-3-bet ranges are polar: hands worth stacking off + trash that does not mind folding to a jam; medium hands limp-call, so jamming light only runs into value.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Playing against polarized ranges
-
ak_no_hit_vs_polar_call_or_fold
Do not jam ace-high: call or fold. You are behind the value and only beat folding bluffs.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: AK with no pair in a big 3-bet/4-bet pot vs a polarized range
Условие: AK missed (ace-high) in a 3-bet/4-bet pot; villain's polar range you only beat the bluffs that fold to aggression.
Обоснование автора: Jamming ace-high into a polar range folds out the bluffs you beat and is called only by better.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Playing against polarized ranges
-
blocker_effect_reduces_value_combos
Apply blocker (locker) effect: holding A and K cuts villain's AA/KK/AK to about half (~3 combos each), reducing his value count.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: using AK blockers when counting villain value combos
Условие: You hold AK; villain's value includes AA/KK/AK.
Обоснование автора: Blockers to AA/KK/AK roughly halve those combos, a real but limited equity/decision adjustment.
Review: needs_context
Кластер: Marginal call/fold decision factors
-
call_fold_six_question_framework
Run the checklist: 1) how many value combos (many->fold); 2) total range width (narrow polar->fold); 3) opponent type / bluff frequency; 4) line difficulty + cost (weird+expensive->fold); 5) how it looks from villain's POV / are you capped; 6) are there better hands to call with.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: deciding call vs fold facing a big bet
Условие: Facing a big bet/jam and unsure whether to call or fold.
Обоснование автора: A repeatable factor checklist for marginal call/fold spots; references a dedicated framework video.
Review: needs_context
Кластер: Marginal call/fold decision factors
-
complex_expensive_lines_are_underbluffed
Lean fold: few players bluff big in complex non-standard lines; such lines are under-bluffed.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: evaluating a weird, expensive line
Условие: Villain takes an unusual, complex AND expensive line (e.g. limp-3bet -> c-bet -> turn jam).
Обоснование автора: Bluffing expensively in a weird line is hard and rare, so these lines skew to value.
Review: needs_context
Кластер: Marginal call/fold decision factors
-
uncapped_hero_invites_villain_bluffs
Account for villain bluffing more vs your uncapped range; but weigh it against value-combo count and range width before calling light.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: assessing villain's incentive to bluff from his perspective
Условие: Your line keeps you uncapped (you can still hold many strong hands).
Обоснование автора: An uncapped hero gives villain a reason to bluff; this raises bluff frequency but does not override a value-heavy narrow range.
Review: needs_context
Кластер: Marginal call/fold decision factors
-
fold_ak_jt7_vs_limp3bet_jam
Fold: narrow value-heavy polar range, you only beat folding bluffs, the line is complex+expensive, and you have better call-down hands (TT-AA, JTs).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: AK on J-T-7 facing limp-3bet -> c-bet -> turn jam vs a solid reg
Условие: 4-bet pot, AK (gutshot + backdoors) on J-T-7, solid reg limp-3bet then c-bet then jams turn.
Обоснование автора: Every factor (value combos, width, line cost, better call-downs) points to fold; villain shows KK.
Review: needs_context
Кластер: Marginal call/fold decision factors
Страдай! Или учись пасовать с AK и QQ на префлопе в покере. #покер #poker #покеробучение Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
three_situations_to_play_ak_qq_passively
Play passively (flat, don't 4-bet/5-bet jam) in 3 situations: deep stacks; action from/into early positions; vs nits (low 3-bet/4-bet). Each makes villain's range narrow/strong so you would isolate vs AA/KK.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: when to flat AK/QQ instead of 4-bet/5-bet jam
Условие: You hold AK or QQ facing 3-bet/4-bet action preflop.
Обоснование автора: 4-betting/jamming into a narrow strong range only gets called by better; flatting keeps villain's range wide.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Folding/flatting premium hands preflop vs narrow ranges
-
auto_jamming_premiums_is_a_leak
Recognize the leak: people jam premiums because they don't know how to play them postflop (esp. AK that misses). Learn the postflop instead of simplifying to a -EV jam.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: why players auto-stack AK/QQ preflop
Условие: You default to stacking off AK/QQ preflop to avoid postflop decisions.
Обоснование автора: The auto-stack-off 'simplification' is a costly leak vs narrow ranges.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Folding/flatting premium hands preflop vs narrow ranges
-
situation1_deep_flat_premiums
Flat the 3-bet (or call the 4-bet): deep, villain gives action only with strong hands, so AK/QQ becomes a bluff-catcher. Solver even flats AK in BB at 200bb.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: situation 1: deep stacks
Условие: Deep (150-200bb), you could 4-bet AK/QQ or flat the 3-bet.
Обоснование автора: Deep, 4-betting isolates you against AA/KK; flatting realizes AK/QQ's equity as a bluff-catcher.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Folding/flatting premium hands preflop vs narrow ranges
-
situation2_early_position_action_flat
Flat the 3-bet with AK/QQ (even at 100bb, even OOP): 4-betting only isolates you vs AA/KK; flatting keeps villain's range wide.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: situation 2: action from/into early positions
Условие: A 3-bet comes from or into early position (a narrow ~5-7% range; micro even tighter).
Обоснование автора: Early-position 3-bet ranges are narrow and strong; raising them shrinks villain to only better hands.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Folding/flatting premium hands preflop vs narrow ranges
-
situation3_vs_nits_passive_any_position
Play passive in ANY position vs nits; easy AK/QQ stack-offs are only vs wide late-position ranges (3-bet 15%, 4-bet 6%). Use HUD 3-bet/4-bet stats.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: situation 3: vs nits
Условие: Opponent has low 3-bet/4-bet stats (a nit: 4-bet ~1% = AA/KK only), in any position.
Обоснование автора: A nit's tiny 3-bet/4-bet range is essentially AA/KK; only wide ranges make AK/QQ a profitable stack-off.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Folding/flatting premium hands preflop vs narrow ranges
-
stack_off_premiums_vs_wide_not_narrow
Stacking off AK/QQ is +EV vs WIDE ranges (late-position blind battles, aggressive opponents) and -EV vs narrow/strong ranges; identify the range before committing.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: when stacking off AK/QQ is +EV
Условие: Deciding whether to get AK/QQ in preflop.
Обоснование автора: The same hand is a clear get-in vs a wide range and a fold vs a 4-bet-only-AA/KK range.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Folding/flatting premium hands preflop vs narrow ranges
-
combo_count_blocker_test_premiums
Count value combos and use blockers (AK blocks AA/KK, QQ blocks QQ); ask 'will this opponent stack off a worse hand?' If no -> flat or fold, don't jam.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the count-and-block test for AK/QQ
Условие: Considering a 4-bet/5-bet jam with AK or QQ.
Обоснование автора: Blockers + a narrow range show the get-in range is AA/KK; the silent question settles it.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Folding/flatting premium hands preflop vs narrow ranges
-
concrete_tan_ak_wong_qq_jam_minus_ev
Both are -EV on range (the jam/call range is AA/KK-heavy); they were lucky to flip. Tan could flat the open-4-bet; Wong could flat the 5-bet.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: AK 5-bet-jam vs QQ call, deep
Условие: Deep (~140bb): Tan 3-bets AK, Wong open-4-bets QQ, Tan 5-bet jams, Wong calls.
Обоснование автора: Deep, AK vs the 5-bet range and QQ vs the call-the-jam range are both behind; flatting avoids the -EV all-in.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Folding/flatting premium hands preflop vs narrow ranges
Ученик косячит с мелкими парами в покере. Принцип игры с мелкими парами #покер #poker #покеробучение Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
default_check_call_second_third_pair_oop
Default to check-call: you beat villain's bluffs and have ~5 outs to improve plus backdoor equity. Don't fold them by default.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: default line for 2nd/3rd pairs OOP
Условие: You defended OOP (BB) and flopped second or third pair.
Обоснование автора: Second/third pair has showdown value, outs, and backdoor equity vs a wide c-betting range.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
avoid_both_extremes_overfold_or_call_blindly
Avoid both extremes: over-folding (villain auto-profits c-betting any two) and calling blindly without adjusting to the factors below.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the two extremes
Условие: Playing 2nd/3rd pairs at micro stakes.
Обоснование автора: Over-folding gives free auto-profit; over-calling loses when villain's range/sizing shifts.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
deviate_fold_or_checkraise_big_sizing
Deviate: fold or check-raise — big sizing means a narrower/polarized range and worse pot odds.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 1: above-average sizing
Условие: Villain bets above the usual size (3/4+/overbet).
Обоснование автора: Larger bets give worse odds and represent stronger ranges; trim the weak continues.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
deviate_low_cbet_frequency
Deviate: fold the weakest continues — a low c-bet frequency means a condensed, stronger value range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 2: below-average bet frequency
Условие: Villain's c-bet frequency is below average (50% not 75%).
Обоснование автора: Infrequent c-bets are value-weighted, lowering your weak hands' equity.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
deviate_high_turn_river_aggression
Decide on the FLOP which hands can hold for 3 barrels; those that can't -> check-fold or turn into check-raise bluffs (you can't realize 3 streets passively).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 3: high turn/river aggression
Условие: Villain has high turn/river aggression (barrels a lot, won't check the turn).
Обоснование автора: A barreling villain denies cheap realization, so weak pairs can't passively call down.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
checkraise_semibluff_with_pair_plus_backdoors
Use these as the basis of your check-raise bluffs: they block villain's strong hands, can barrel the turn, and improve on the river; they balance your value check-raises (sets/two pair).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: 2nd/3rd pairs with backdoors as check-raise bluffs
Условие: You hold 2nd/3rd pair with a backdoor FD/OESD, especially vs an aggressive opponent.
Обоснование автора: Pair-plus-backdoor hands have blockers and barreling/improvement potential, ideal check-raise bluffs.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
per_hand_calldown_or_checkfold_checkraise
Either pick a hand suitable for a 3-street check-call and call down, OR check-fold / check-raise-bluff. The passive check-call -> check-fold line is the worst.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: two options per hand
Условие: Holding a marginal pair OOP facing a likely multi-barrel.
Обоснование автора: Half-measures (call flop, fold later) burn money vs a barreling villain.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
concrete_54_second_pair_all_three_factors
Check-fold the flop or check-raise (and barrel the turn); the passive check-call/check-call/check-fold line is the worst.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: 54 second pair on Q-4-3 vs all three factors
Условие: 54s second pair + backdoors on Q-4-3 in the BB; villain bets big, c-bets infrequently, and barrels turn/river (narrow BTN open).
Обоснование автора: All three deviation factors apply, so the default check-call is wrong; fold or turn it into a bluff.
Review: trainer_candidate
Финн Антониус проплатил по полной в покере! Разбор полярной ставки #poker #покер #покеробучение Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 11
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
polarized_bet_definition
Recognize a polarized bet: two poles (very strong hands + bluffs, no medium), usually a big size (3/4, pot, overbet); strength of the value side depends on street and board.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: what a polarized bet is
Условие: Facing a bet and reading the range shape.
Обоснование автора: Polar = value + bluffs with nothing in between; the size and line define the value side.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching and polarized bets
-
why_polar_ranges_use_big_sizing
Big sizing maximizes payment from worse with the strong hands and maximizes fold pressure with the bluffs; the size balances value and bluffs.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: why polarized ranges bet big
Условие: A polarized range chooses its sizing.
Обоснование автора: Strong hands want max value, bluffs want max fold equity, so polar ranges pick large sizes.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching and polarized bets
-
default_fold_top_pair_vs_river_polar_threebarrel
Default fold even top pair / TPTK; at micro stakes over-fold (call two pair+) because that pool under-bluffs the line. Don't fall in love with blocker-calls.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: default defense vs a river polar 3-barrel
Условие: A river polar 3-barrel (bet/bet/overbet) into you, value side = trips/straights/full houses.
Обоснование автора: A multi-barrel polar river line is value-heavy; weaker pools under-bluff it further.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching and polarized bets
-
bluffcatch_factor_order_value_combos_first
Count VALUE combos first (primary), then range width, then aggression (last). Do not lead with the aggression stat as many micro-stakes players do.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the order of bluff-catch factors
Условие: Deciding whether to bluff-catch a big bet.
Обоснование автора: An aggressive villain can still be value-heavy; a passive one with a huge range can over-bluff. Value-combo count dominates.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching and polarized bets
-
bet_size_worsens_pot_odds
Bigger bets give worse pot odds (1/2->25%, pot->33%, 2x->40%) plus a ~5-7% margin, so all else equal you call big bets less.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: bet size and pot odds
Условие: Bluff-catching different bet sizes.
Обоснование автора: Pot odds scale with size; you must win more often to call a bigger bet.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching and polarized bets
-
overbet_removes_medium_value_combos
An overbet can have FEWER value combos than a small bet: the overbet sizing excludes medium value (he'd bet medium hands small to get called), so the overbet removes medium value from the range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the key polar insight
Условие: Comparing the value combos in an overbet vs a small bet.
Обоснование автора: Medium hands want small value sizings; overbetting them is -EV, so they are absent from overbet ranges.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching and polarized bets
-
range_width_more_bluffs
A wider villain range has more busted/bluff combos -> call more; a narrow range (EP open, bet into 2+, multi-barrel) has few bluffs -> fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: range width and bluffs
Условие: Assessing how many bluff combos villain can have.
Обоснование автора: Width determines the number of missed hands available to bluff.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching and polarized bets
-
exception_call_big_polar_on_crooked_lines
Call big polar bets MORE than small bets here: ask 'would he bet medium value this big?' If no, the line is crooked, the range is polar with few value, and bluff-catching is +EV.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the counterintuitive exception
Условие: A big polar bet/overbet on a 'crooked' line where few credible value combos exist and the range is wide.
Обоснование автора: On crooked lines the overbet contains little value and many busted hands, so it is over-bluffed relative to its size.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching and polarized bets
-
aggression_is_the_last_factor
Use aggression LAST: more aggressive = more bluffs = call more, but it overrides nothing. A value-heavy aggro villain still has you beat; a wide passive villain can over-bluff.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: where aggression fits
Условие: Weighing villain's aggression for a bluff-catch.
Обоснование автора: Aggression scales bluff frequency but cannot beat a value-heavy range; value-combo count comes first.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching and polarized bets
-
concrete_ak_call_wide_overbet_exception
Call: the polar overbet excludes his thin value, leaving few value combos (~9%) and many busted hands, so ace-high is +EV (~44% vs ~33%).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete exception: ace-high calls a wide overbet
Условие: AK (ace-high) on 9-7-4-Q vs a wide BB defender's river overbet; he would not overbet his thin value (9x/two pair want small).
Обоснование автора: Thin value bets small; the overbet's value is too thin to beat a wide range's bluffs, so you bluff-catch.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching and polarized bets
-
concrete_antonius_kj_marginal_call
The call is marginal/slightly +EV (~38% vs ~33% with bluffs present), not a gross error; but it is a narrow, value-leaning line.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Antonius calls KJ top pair vs a river overbet
Условие: KJ top pair on K-9-9-5-Q vs a river overbet from a range with some bluffs.
Обоснование автора: With some bluffs in villain's overbet, KJ is a slim +EV bluff-catch; close, not clearly wrong.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bluff-catching and polarized bets
Зачем рейзить флоп с натсами в покере? -$450к за 1 раздачу Тони Джи #poker #покер #tritonpoker Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 12
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
fast_play_strong_made_hand_dry_flop
Fast-play it: raise / check-raise a large share of strong made hands. Do not slow-play (check-call) on dry boards.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: 3-bet pot, OOP caller checks, faces a flop c-bet with a strong made hand (trips/set) on a dry paired board
Условие: You hold a strong made hand (e.g. trips or a set) on a dry, safe, often paired flop in a 3-bet pot, out of position versus the preflop aggressor.
Обоснование автора: Solver raises a large portion of strong trips/sets on a dry paired flop; slow-playing them is a mistake by both solver and human logic.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
raise_gets_called_by_worse_on_flop
Raise to get immediate value: worse hands pay you on the flop, which is where you earn money with a strong hand.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: strong made hand raises the flop and is called by worse made hands and draws
Условие: Worse hands (overpairs, top pairs, draws, even weak pairs) are still in villain's range on the flop and will not fold to a raise.
Обоснование автора: First reason to fast-play: a raise is a large bet that worse hands call, so you get paid on the flop instead of letting them fold later.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
raise_for_protection_and_range_cleaning
Raise to deny equity and clean villain's range: you fold out or charge weak draws, so the calling range is concentrated on hands you dominate.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: strong made hand raises the flop to charge draws and fold out weak equity
Условие: Villain's range contains weak draws (gutshots, backdoor flush/straight draws) that can outdraw you or barrel later on cards you cannot read.
Обоснование автора: Raising charges or folds out weak draws (gutshots, backdoor FD/OESD) and condenses villain's continuing range onto strong hands, protecting you and avoiding tough river spots.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
pot_geometry_to_stack_off_by_river
Fast-play to build the pot across streets; if you do not start on the flop, it is hard to get stacks in by the river.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: check-raise the flop to inflate the pot so stacks can go in by the river
Условие: Stacks are deep enough that you need to start building the pot on the flop to get all-in by the river with a strong hand.
Обоснование автора: Solver wants all chips in by the river with strong hands; an inflated flop pot and a committed villain make later streets pay more than a passive line.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
slow_play_pushes_into_stronger_range
Avoid the passive line: a check/check/check-push into an uncapped, stronger range only gets called by hands that beat you. This is the self-inflicted 'cooler'.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: check-call flop, check-call turn, check-push river with a slow-played strong hand
Условие: You slow-played a strong hand and let all of villain's weak equity stay in; by the river many straights and backdoor flushes complete and you cannot read the runout.
Обоснование автора: By never charging weak draws, the passive line lets them complete; the river jam runs into the part of villain's range that improved past you.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
checkraise_barrel_line_gets_paid_more
Prefer the flop check-raise + barrel line: the pot is inflated and villain is more committed, so non-all-in value bets get called more than a large river jam after a passive line.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: compare check-raise flop + barrel versus passive call-down then river jam
Условие: You want maximum payment with a strong hand and can either build the pot via a flop check-raise or play passively and jam later.
Обоснование автора: A committed villain in an already-large pot calls medium-sized turn/river value bets more readily than a polarizing river overbet jam after a small passive line.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
hands_play_the_way_they_look
Play hands the way they look: strong made hands bet/raise and build pots; medium and weak made hands prefer checks and calls for smaller pots and bluff-catching.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: general framework for choosing line by hand strength
Условие: You are choosing a line postflop and want a simple, solver-consistent heuristic.
Обоснование автора: Core human+solver logic predating solvers: strong hands want big pots (bet/raise), medium/weak hands want small pots (check/call).
Review: trainer_candidate
-
strong_draws_bet_raise_semibluff
Play strong draws fast: bet and raise them. They have so much equity they are often ahead of made hands and want to build the pot.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: strong combo draw plays aggressively (bet/raise) on the flop
Условие: You hold a strong unmade hand such as a combo draw (flush draw + open-ended straight draw, ~16 outs, ~55% vs an overpair).
Обоснование автора: A 16-out monster draw has ~55% equity versus an overpair, so it is stronger than many made hands and belongs in the betting/raising range.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bet/raise to deny equity (the third bet purpose), incl. multiway
-
weak_draws_fold_or_bluff_raise
Fold it or use it as the bluff portion of a raise; do not call off-odds. Too weak to check-call, it becomes a raise candidate to balance value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: bare weak draw faces a bet with no pot odds to call
Условие: You hold a weak unmade hand (bare gutshot, backdoor flush draw, backdoor OESD) and a bet does not give you the pot odds to call.
Обоснование автора: A bare backdoor/gutshot has no pot odds (pot_odds) to continue, so the choice is fold or raise-bluff; solver uses these as the bluff share of check-raises.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bet/raise to deny equity (the third bet purpose), incl. multiway
-
balanced_checkraise_value_plus_weak_draws
Balance the raise: pair strong made hands (sets/trips) with weak draws (gutshots/backdoor FD) as bluffs, so every value hand has bluffs alongside it.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: combine strong made hands with weak draws in the check-raise range
Условие: You are building a check-raise range and want it hard to read and not exploitable.
Обоснование автора: A check-raise that mixes value (sets/trips) with weak-draw bluffs is balanced and hard to read: every street has both value and bluffs.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bet/raise to deny equity (the third bet purpose), incl. multiway
-
slow_play_medium_hands_vs_aggressor
Here slow-play is correct: check-call to catch bluffs. Slow-playing belongs to medium hands versus aggression, not to strong hands.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: medium made hand versus a hyper-aggressive opponent
Условие: You hold a medium made hand (second pair, top pair weak kicker) against a hyper-aggressive opponent who barrels and bluffs a lot.
Обоснование автора: Medium made hands want small pots and to catch bluffs; against a hyper-aggressive villain you check-call rather than fast-play.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
pfr_bluffcatch_vs_polarized_raise
Call the flop raise rather than re-raising; on later streets play as a bluff-catcher versus the polarized range. You block strong combos and catch the bluff portion.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: preflop 3-bettor c-bets, gets raised, and plays on as a bluff-catcher
Условие: As the preflop 3-bettor (e.g. AK) you c-bet a dry paired flop and get check-raised by a polarized range (trips/full or air); you later improve to a marginal two pair.
Обоснование автора: Villain's check-raise is polarized (trips/full or nothing); with two pair you cannot profitably raise, so you bluff-catch, using blockers to the strong combos.
Review: trainer_candidate
Как играть мелкие пары 22-77 без сета? Микро-лимиты в покере #poker #покер #покеробучение Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 11
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
small_pairs_preflop_call_only_in_bb_micro
Don't open EP (sets rare ~1/8, overcards, rake); don't cold-call in middle/free positions; CALL/defend only in the BB (you already posted), with a wide range, not just for set value. Exception: a big-stacked fish behind.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: small pairs (22-77) preflop at micro stakes
Условие: Micro stakes (high rake); you hold a small pocket pair preflop.
Обоснование автора: Outside the BB, rake plus poor realization make set-mining small pairs -EV at micro stakes.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Small pairs without a set + the 'bottom of calling range' method
-
why_bb_only_rake_and_posted_blind
Every fold of a posted blind costs you, so calling beats folding in the BB; high-stakes players cold-call pairs widely only because rake is lower — at micro you cannot.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: why small pairs are a BB-only call at micro
Условие: Comparing a BB call vs a cold-call of small pairs.
Обоснование автора: The posted blind makes BB defence cheap; rake kills the cold-call EV at micro.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Small pairs without a set + the 'bottom of calling range' method
-
call_missed_small_pair_as_second_pair
Check-call standard sizings (1/3-1/2 pot) with second pair on dry boards.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: a small pair that is second pair on the flop
Условие: Your small pair missed the set but is second pair (e.g. 77 on Q-6-2).
Обоснование автора: Second pair has enough showdown value/equity to continue vs normal sizings.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Small pairs without a set + the 'bottom of calling range' method
-
call_third_fourth_pair_only_with_backdoor
Call only if it has backdoor equity (a turn can give an OESD/gutshot, e.g. 6 or 3 on T-7-4); with no backdoor potential, fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: a small pair as third/fourth pair
Условие: Your small pair is third/fourth pair (e.g. 55 on T-7-4).
Обоснование автора: Backdoor straight potential adds turn equity that justifies continuing a weak pair.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Small pairs without a set + the 'bottom of calling range' method
-
flushdraw_boards_call_only_one_card_fd
Call only if your pair also has a one-card flush draw (you hold the suit, e.g. 5 of spades on a spade board); otherwise fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: small pairs on flush-draw boards
Условие: The board has a flush draw and you hold a small pair.
Обоснование автора: A one-card flush draw adds a live turn out (and overtakes overpairs) that thin pairs lack.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Small pairs without a set + the 'bottom of calling range' method
-
think_in_ranges_identify_range_bottom
Think in RANGES, not single hands: you have a whole calling range; on each street identify the BOTTOM — the weakest hands you continue with (the reluctant calls).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the range-thinking method
Условие: Facing a bet after calling preflop OOP.
Обоснование автора: Knowing the bottom lets you build a continuation range automatically: keep everything stronger, trim the bottom.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Small pairs without a set + the 'bottom of calling range' method
-
range_bottom_folds_next_street_if_no_improvement
The bottom of the current street always folds the next street if it did not improve (flop bottom -> fold turn; turn bottom -> fold river); even with improvement, not always a call.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the key range-bottom rule
Условие: The bottom of your calling range did not improve on the next street.
Обоснование автора: Reluctant calls have no equity to keep paying; folding them on later streets saves money.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Small pairs without a set + the 'bottom of calling range' method
-
trim_range_bottom_now_for_big_sizing
Trim the bottom of your calling range and fold now (any street): big sizing means worse pot odds and a stronger/more polarized range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: trim the bottom this street: large sizing
Условие: Villain bets above the usual size (3/4+ pot / overbet vs the usual 1/3-1/2).
Обоснование автора: Bigger bets give worse odds and represent a stronger range, removing the bottom's profitability.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Small pairs without a set + the 'bottom of calling range' method
-
trim_range_bottom_now_for_low_bet_frequency
Trim the bottom and fold more: a low bet frequency means a stronger range, so your weak hands have less equity. Either factor -> trim; both -> over-fold heavily (call only top pair).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: trim the bottom this street: low bet frequency
Условие: Villain's bet frequency is below average (e.g. c-bet 50% not 75%).
Обоснование автора: A condensed, infrequent betting range is value-heavy, crushing the bottom of your range.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Small pairs without a set + the 'bottom of calling range' method
-
range_thinking_algorithm
1) remember your calling range (use studied flop models); 2) map it onto the flop; 3) identify the bottom; 4) trim the bottom for size/frequency; 5) the bottom folds next street; recompute each street.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the algorithm for range thinking
Условие: Building your continuation range each street.
Обоснование автора: A repeatable procedure that turns range thinking into easy per-street fold decisions.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Small pairs without a set + the 'bottom of calling range' method
-
concrete_55_on_t43_fold_to_big_cbet
Fold the flop: the above-average sizing trims your range bottom (55). Calling down three barrels is super -EV (won vs a QJ bluff but a big long-run loser).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: 55 on T-4-3 BB vs an above-average c-bet
Условие: 55 (2nd pair + backdoor) on T-4-3 in the BB vs an EP open; villain c-bets 3/4 pot.
Обоснование автора: A 3/4-pot flop bet removes the bottom of your calling range; calling three barrels with it is a long-run loser.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Small pairs without a set + the 'bottom of calling range' method
Когда выкидывать КК на префлопе в покере? Тони Джи -$700k с КК #poker #покер #покеробучение Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 7
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
three_situations_to_fold_or_not_stack_off_kk
KK usually stacks off, but in 3 situations don't: (1) you open-4-bet into an EP 3-bet with action behind; (2) full-ring vs a nit with a tiny 4-bet range; (3) deep stacks. In each, villain's continuing range is essentially AA.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: when not to stack off KK preflop
Условие: You hold KK preflop facing 4-bet/jam action.
Обоснование автора: In these spots you almost never see a worse hand, so KK is crushed.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Folding/flatting premium hands preflop vs narrow ranges
-
situation1_open4bet_with_action_behind
Fold KK even at 100bb: a strong EP 3-bet + your tight 4-bet + a jam + a cold-call of the jam collapses the range to AA (and you block KK, making AA likelier).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: situation 1: open-4-bet then a jam + cold-call behind
Условие: You open-4-bet vs an EP 3-bet and then someone jams and the original opener cold-calls the jam.
Обоснование автора: Layered strong actions leave only AA continuing; the closer of the action just calls with AA.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Folding/flatting premium hands preflop vs narrow ranges
-
situation2_fullring_vs_nit_tiny_4bet
Fold KK: a ~1% 4-bet range is only AA+KK, and holding KK he 4-bets only AA. Use the HUD 4-bet% stat to spot nits.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: situation 2: full-ring vs a nit's ~1% 4-bet
Условие: Full-ring (9-max); a nit (4-bet range ~1%) 4-bets from early position.
Обоснование автора: A 1% range = {AA, KK}; with KK in hand the nit's 4-bet is AA-only.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Folding/flatting premium hands preflop vs narrow ranges
-
situation3_deep_stacks_dont_stack_off_kk
Do not stack off: a reasonable opponent folds worse than KK and stacks only AA. Flat the 4-bet (or 3-bet then call) and play postflop; never get all-in preflop with KK deep.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: situation 3: deep stacks
Условие: Deep (200-300bb), you 3-bet, villain 4-bets, you hold KK.
Обоснование автора: Deep, the get-it-in range vs your 5-bet is AA; play KK postflop instead of stacking off.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Folding/flatting premium hands preflop vs narrow ranges
-
combo_count_blocker_test_for_premiums
Count combos and use blockers: with KK you block KK so AA (~6) dominates; ask 'would this opponent stack off a worse hand?' If no -> fold the premium.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the count-and-block test for folding premiums
Условие: Deciding whether to stack off a premium (KK) into tight action.
Обоснование автора: Blockers + combo count show that a tight 4-bet/jam range is AA-heavy; the silent question settles it.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Folding/flatting premium hands preflop vs narrow ranges
-
dont_rationalize_cooler
Don't tilt-rationalize 'it's a cooler, I couldn't play it differently'; in these three spots it is a FOLD, and disciplined premium-folds save stacks.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the cooler rationalization
Условие: You lost a stack with KK vs AA and want to call it a cooler.
Обоснование автора: Reframing avoidable stack-offs as coolers blocks improvement.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Folding/flatting premium hands preflop vs narrow ranges
-
concrete_tony_g_kk_should_fold
It is a fold, not a cooler: the BTN 4-bet-call range is narrow value (QQ/JJ sets, AA, sometimes AKs); KK beats almost nothing that continues, and the jam runs into AA/sets.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Tony G KK 4-bets, flatted by AA, jams Q-J-7
Условие: Deep 4-bet pot; KK 4-bet, BTN flats AA, flop Q-J-7fd, Tony G checks then jams into the narrow 4-bet-call range.
Обоснование автора: Situation 3 (deep): the flatting range crushes KK; jamming just stacks off to AA.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Folding/flatting premium hands preflop vs narrow ranges
Фил Хельмут проиграл с топ-сетом! Слоуплеи в покере чем плохи? #poker #покер #покеробучение Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 10
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
three_bet_strong_hands_dont_coldcall_slowplay
3-bet, do not cold-call: 3-bet is the max-EV action; calling invites a multiway pot where opponents realize equity against you.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: strong pair (KK/QQ/AA) facing an open
Условие: You hold a strong pocket pair facing an open and consider just calling (slow-play).
Обоснование автора: Calling KK lets many players in (5-way -> ~50% equity); 3-betting denies equity, builds the pot, isolates.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
main_reason_to_3bet_is_to_get_paid
3-bet strong hands primarily to GET PAID (value); solver adds weaker 3-bets so the strong ones get paid — board coverage is secondary, not the main reason.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: why solver 3-bets strong hands
Условие: Understanding why strong hands are 3-bet.
Обоснование автора: The point of 3-betting value is payment; the ~0-EV weak 3-bets exist to make the strong ones get called.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
low_stakes_drop_zero_ev_3bet_bluffs
You may drop the ~0-EV 3-bet bluffs (suited Ax, suited connectors, small pairs) to simplify; add them as stakes rise.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: simplifying the 3-bet range at low stakes
Условие: Playing low stakes (NL10-NL25) where opponents do not exploit a value-only 3-bet range.
Обоснование автора: At low stakes a tighter value-only 3-bet range loses little and simplifies play; higher stakes require the bluffs.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
each_extra_player_cuts_your_equity
Isolate by 3-betting: each extra player adds outs against you (KK ~50% equity 5-way); play strong overpairs heads-up.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: equity of a strong overpair multiway
Условие: A strong overpair in a multiway pot.
Обоснование автора: More players = more live outs against you; isolating restores your edge.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
winning_small_pots_adds_up
Do not disdain a 3-bet that just wins the open + blinds; that is +EV every time, before you even get paid off.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: value of just winning the open + blinds
Условие: Tempted to slow-play to 'win a big pot'.
Обоснование автора: Stealing ~3bb repeatedly is a real winrate; the big-pot fantasy is not required for 3-betting to be best.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
bet_medium_hands_multiway_to_deny_equity
Bet/raise anyway to deny opponents' equity (steal their live outs + bluff equity); checking lets multiple draws realize for free.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: overpair / top pair good kicker in a multiway pot
Условие: Multiway pot, you hold an overpair or top pair good kicker, no clean value bet vs the continuation range.
Обоснование автора: Even without thin value, a bet strips each opponent's outs/draws, which is itself profitable multiway.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bet/raise to deny equity (the third bet purpose), incl. multiway
-
bet_purpose_includes_denying_opponent_equity
Add a third bet purpose: denying OPPONENTS' equity. A bet that removes their live outs/draws is profitable even with no value vs the continuation range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: reasons to bet beyond thin value and semibluff
Условие: You think 'no thin value, no semibluff, so check'.
Обоснование автора: The classic two reasons (thin value, semibluff) miss equity denial against opponents' draws.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bet/raise to deny equity (the third bet purpose), incl. multiway
-
raise_donk_on_drawy_board_with_strong_hand
Raise the donk-bet (deny equity / get value vs worse) rather than calling passively and letting draws get there.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: facing a donk-bet on a draw-heavy board
Условие: Multiway, draw-heavy board, you hold a strong hand and are short (~70bb) facing a donk-bet.
Обоснование автора: Flatting on a wet multiway board gives free equity to draws; raising charges them and isolates.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bet/raise to deny equity (the third bet purpose), incl. multiway
-
bad_runout_pot_control_after_slowplay
Pot-control / check-fold the now-beaten strong hand; the leak was the earlier slow-play, not this fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: strong hand on a runout where the draw completes
Условие: The flush completes (4-flush river) and your strong made hand (top set) is now vulnerable.
Обоснование автора: By the river many flushes/two-pair beat top set; the mistake was passivity earlier, not folding now.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Bet/raise to deny equity (the third bet purpose), incl. multiway
-
concrete_hellmuth_kk_slowplay_loss
The mistakes were slow-playing pre (should 3-bet) and passive flop play (should raise the donk); the river fold of top set was fine.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Hellmuth slow-plays KK into a 5-way pot
Условие: KK cold-called pre (5-way), donk-bet flat flop/turn on a wet board, top set folds to the river nut-flush lead.
Обоснование автора: Slow-playing gave four opponents free equity; Keating's draw got there. Fast-play would have avoided the trap.
Review: trainer_candidate
Когда надо сбросить АА - тузы в покере? Тузы проиграли $700к #poker #покер #покеробучение Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 7
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
passive_or_fold_aa_when_draw_completes
Switch from bets to checks; vs big aggression (large bet/raise/overbet/donk) lean fold the aces.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: AA when an obvious draw completes
Условие: You hold an overpair (AA) and an obvious flush or straight completes.
Обоснование автора: A completed flush/straight beats your overpair and is now in villain's range.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
passive_aa_when_board_pairs
Play passive (check, sometimes fold): villain now has many trips/full houses, especially in position with all the Xx combos.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: AA when the board pairs
Условие: The board pairs (especially a high card or the second card).
Обоснование автора: A paired board gives villain trips and full houses that beat your overpair.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
dont_fall_in_love_with_aces_board_changes
Re-evaluate each street: the board changes (straights/flushes/pairs); don't carry a flop 'stack off' plan to the river ignoring the runout.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: not carrying a stack-off plan blindly
Условие: You decided to play AA strong on the flop.
Обоснование автора: All hands are roughly equal on the flop; by the river the board has often passed your overpair.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
key_question_what_worse_hands_call
Ask 'what worse hands will call my bet?' If few or none -> don't bet (no value). Beginner heuristic: 'what is the weakest hand I'D call with on this line?'
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the key question before value-betting AA
Условие: About to value-bet aces.
Обоснование автора: A value bet needs worse hands to call; if your own standard would fold worse, so will villain.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
initial_vs_continuation_range_for_value
Value-bet against what CONTINUES, not what arrived: scare cards remove the worse hands (2nd/top pair) that used to pay, so the continuation range often has no worse hands.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: value-bet against the continuation range
Условие: Scare cards (flush/straight completing) arrive by the river.
Обоснование автора: The river-arriving range is not the calling range; scare cards stop worse hands from continuing.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
no_value_bet_check_or_block_bet
Check, or use a small block-bet: at low stakes a small bet widens villain's worse calls and avoids being bluffed off; deep/tough games, just check.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: what to do with AA when there is no value bet
Условие: You hold AA but no worse hands call a normal value bet.
Обоснование автора: A block-bet trades a big value bet for a small one that worse hands call and that caps your downside vs bluffs.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
concrete_wong_aa_no_value_fold_jam
Don't value-bet (no worse hands call), and fold to the jam: ~35% equity vs the continuation range, and he can bluff-jam QJ blocking your boats. The bet is a value-own.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Wong AA on K-J-5-Q-5
Условие: 3-bet pot, AA on K-J-5-Q-5 (board pairs); you value-bet the river and get jammed; villain's range = full houses/quads with few worse.
Обоснование автора: On a paired board the calling/jamming range is boats and quads; aces-up is beaten and only worse hands fold.
Review: trainer_candidate
Легенда покера – Фил Айви уже не годится? Чек-рейзы в покере #poker #покер #philivey #fulltilt Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 10
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
checkraise_low_frequency_on_dynamic_boards
Solver check-raises on most textures, but at LOW frequency on very dynamic boards because the board often spoils later; keep the flop check-raise range small there.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: check-raising strong hands on a very dynamic flop
Условие: OOP with a strong hand on a very dynamic board (flush draw + straight draw present).
Обоснование автора: On boards that change a lot, realization is lower, so big flop check-raises are less rewarded.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
transfer_action_to_turn_on_dynamic_boards
Transfer the action to the turn: check-call the flop, then check-raise/barrel the turn. (Or play by solver if you have studied it.)
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: simplification on dynamic boards (BB vs BTN wide)
Условие: OOP in wide ranges (BB vs BTN) on a dynamic board you find hard to navigate by solver.
Обоснование автора: Boards spoil often, so deferring to the turn (one card to come) simplifies and reduces tough flop guesses.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
force_action_on_turn_if_board_did_not_spoil
With one card to come you can force the action: value check-raise when the board didn't spoil; if it spoiled, check-call and realize.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: why deferring works
Условие: Turn card arrives on a dynamic board.
Обоснование автора: One card to come reduces the downside of committing, so the turn is where you push value on dynamic boards.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
value_check_push_turn_with_strong_hand
Value check-push (check-raise all-in): you burn opponents' FD/OESD/shot equity AND get called by worse; you keep high equity (~70%) and high fold equity.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: strong hand facing a big turn bet on a dynamic board
Условие: OOP, strong hand (two pair) on a dynamic board, facing a big turn bet, deep.
Обоснование автора: On a board that will often spoil, the turn check-push denies draws and gets value from worse before bad rivers; villain continues ~13% so fold equity is high and you stay ahead when called.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
regs_barrel_polarized_big_turn_bets
Read the polar barrel: strong top pairs/overpairs/two-pair/sets for value + draws (OESD/FD/shots) denying equity; big sizing pressures you OOP.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: how regs barrel big turn bets
Условие: Facing a big (pot/overbet) turn bet from a strong reg in position.
Обоснование автора: Modern regs barrel turns with a relatively polar range and large sizings to attack OOP players.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
defend_vs_big_polar_turn_bet_oop
Do not over-fold: call your top pairs (e.g. JT/KJ) and best draws (top pair + FD); fold the rest. You cannot fold the top of your range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: defending OOP vs a big polar turn bet
Условие: OOP facing a big polar turn bet with top pairs and good draws.
Обоснование автора: Folding too much to a big polar bet is exploitable; the top of your range must continue.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
river_bluffcatch_start_with_villain_thin_value
First ask how many THIN-VALUE hands villain bets here (what worse hands he value-bets) — that gauges whether he can over-bluff; then count value vs bluffs, blockers and board fit, and compare pot odds to equity.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the main principle for river bluff-calls
Условие: Facing a big river bet/jam and deciding whether to bluff-catch.
Обоснование автора: If villain has many thin-value bets he can also have bluffs; if he only ever value-jams the nuts, there are no bluffs to catch.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
marginal_river_call_depends_on_aggression
Vs an aggressive over-bluffer the call is +EV (he bluffs ~35-40%); vs a straightforward player who value-jams straights too, lean check-fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: profile-dependence of a marginal river call
Условие: A marginal river bluff-catch (~32-37% equity vs ~35% needed).
Обоснование автора: The same equity flips +/-EV with villain's bluff frequency; the read decides the marginal spot.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
weak_draws_fold_oop_or_move_to_turn_checkraise
Fold (no pot odds + reverse implied odds); instead move these draws into your turn check-raise bluff range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: bare weak draw OOP facing a big bet
Условие: OOP with a bare OESD facing a big bet, with reverse implied odds.
Обоснование автора: A bare OESD lacks the price to call OOP and has reverse implied odds; it is better as a turn check-raise bluff.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
concrete_ivey_two_pair_should_check_push_turn
The leak was the passive turn: should value check-push two pair on the turn. The river check-fold (vs the made flush) was correct.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Ivey two pair, dynamic board, passive line
Условие: Two pair on T-10-6 (FD) dynamic board; check-call flop, check-call big turn overbet, check-fold river A (flush completes).
Обоснование автора: Check-pushing the turn denies draw equity and gets value before bad rivers; Ivey's passive line let the flush get there. Villain shows Q-high flush.
Review: trainer_candidate
Как НЕ уговорить себя на плохой колл в покере? 5 причин недоблефа #poker #покер #pokerability Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 10
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
dont_squeeze_dominated_offsuit_broadway
Do not squeeze JTo-type hands: when called they are dominated by better top pairs, play poorly, block no strong hands, and fold to 4-bets.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: 3-bet squeeze hand selection
Условие: Considering a 3-bet squeeze with a dominated offsuit broadway (e.g. JTo) in position.
Обоснование автора: Dominated, low-playability, no blockers, folds to 4-bet — a losing squeeze.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Preflop discipline (squeeze selection; errors aren't fixable postflop)
-
dont_coldcall_oop_sandwiched
Fold marginal hands (e.g. KTo) when OOP and sandwiched; the position + sandwich make it a losing call.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: cold-calling OOP between two players
Условие: You consider cold-calling a raise OOP while sandwiched (players still to act behind).
Обоснование автора: OOP plus players behind = poor realization; KTo cold-call here is a mistake.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Preflop discipline (squeeze selection; errors aren't fixable postflop)
-
preflop_errors_cannot_be_fixed_postflop
Use studied preflop ranges (open / 3-bet / squeeze / call models); errors made preflop and on the flop cannot be fixed later — good preflop is not getting into bad spots.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: why preflop/flop discipline matters
Условие: Tempted to enter a pot with an off-range hand.
Обоснование автора: The 'don't end up in dark alleys' parable: solid preflop ranges prevent the unwinnable postflop spots.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Preflop discipline (squeeze selection; errors aren't fixable postflop)
-
no_bluff_factor_your_line_is_nutted
Lean fold: villain bluffs less into a line that is often nutted (why bluff a likely-strong range?).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 1 reducing villain's bluffs
Условие: Your own line contains many nut/strong hands and villain can read that.
Обоснование автора: If your range is strong/uncapped, a thinking villain reduces bluff frequency against you.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Call/fold decision framework (value combos, no-bluff factors)
-
no_bluff_factor_villain_line_is_nutted
Lean fold: his range holds the value (e.g. many flushes), so he is not bluff-heavy.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 2 reducing villain's bluffs
Условие: Villain's own line contains many nut/strong hands (he is uncapped).
Обоснование автора: An uncapped villain line is full of value, leaving few bluffs to catch.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Call/fold decision framework (value combos, no-bluff factors)
-
no_bluff_factor_expensive_complex_line_with_cheaper_options
Lean fold: an expensive weird line (river overbet jam) when cheaper bluffs were available is under-bluffed.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 3 reducing villain's bluffs
Условие: Villain takes an expensive, complex line AND had cheaper/simpler bluff options earlier.
Обоснование автора: Players rarely choose the most expensive bluff line when cheaper ones existed.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Call/fold decision framework (value combos, no-bluff factors)
-
no_bluff_factor_unknown_or_passive_opponent
Lean fold: passives bluff far less than they call; treat unknowns as passive -> few bluffs.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 4 reducing villain's bluffs
Условие: Villain is an unknown amateur or a known passive ('telephone') player.
Обоснование автора: Population/known passives under-bluff; assume few bluffs absent reads.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Call/fold decision framework (value combos, no-bluff factors)
-
no_bluff_factor_villain_can_overplay_better_hands
Fold thin bluff-catchers: even villain's 'non-value' plays often beat you, and you risk value-owning yourself.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 5 reducing the value of your call
Условие: Villain can value-jam or overplay hands that are BETTER than yours (amateurs jam medium flushes, overplay made hands).
Обоснование автора: Amateurs overplay second-best-to-them but better-than-you hands, so your weak catcher is dominated even by 'bluffs'.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Call/fold decision framework (value combos, no-bluff factors)
-
concrete_jt_fold_vs_nut_flush_overbet_jam
Fold: the line is value-heavy with almost no bluffs; calling is value-owning and loses. (He talks himself into it and loses $500k.)
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: JT second pair vs a river nut-flush overbet jam
Условие: 3-bet squeeze pot, JT second pair on a 4-flush river; amateur overbet-jams; all 5 no-bluff factors apply.
Обоснование автора: Every factor points to fold; the hero-call is the classic talk-yourself-into-it leak.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Call/fold decision framework (value combos, no-bluff factors)
-
concrete_top_set_fold_vs_passive_river_jam
Fold: your line has flushes/straights/sets (factor 1), his jam line is nutty (factor 2), expensive line (3), unknown=passive (4), he overplays rivered straights (5); equity ~30% < ~35% needed, and passives donk ~25% pure value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: common spot: top set, river flush, passive jams
Условие: Top set on T-7-5fd; brick turn; river is the flush card; a passive opponent donk-jams.
Обоснование автора: A strong-looking hand still folds when all five no-bluff factors stack and the equity math fails.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Call/fold decision framework (value combos, no-bluff factors)
Как играть в 3бет потах без позиции в покере? Ошибка ценой $115к #poker #покер #highstakespoker Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
range_cbet_defers_the_split_to_later_streets
It is okay on the flop (low error, solver even checks JJ ~67%), but it just DEFERS the hard split to the turn/river where money is bigger; you still must split your range into bets and check-calls.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the range-c-bet simplification in 3bp OOP
Условие: 3-bet pot, out of position; you small-range-c-bet (~1/3) most of your range.
Обоснование автора: A blind range-bet avoids a flop mistake but pushes the tough split to more expensive streets.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Playing 3-bet pots out of position (range splitting)
-
split_on_flop_or_turn_either_works
You can split on the FLOP (check-call flop) for a wider/protected checking range and easier later decisions, OR range-bet the flop and split on the turn. Either works if you understand the logic; don't blindly copy a line.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: when to split the range
Условие: Deciding whether to split your range on the flop or the turn.
Обоснование автора: Both approaches are fine; the error is range-betting then playing turn/river randomly.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Playing 3-bet pots out of position (range splitting)
-
split_value_part_three_streets
Include only hands you can bet 3 streets for value (TPGK, two pair+); test 'will worse hands call by the river (or a thin value-bluff)?' If no -> not in the betting range; check-call it.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the value part of the betting range
Условие: Building the value part of your split range.
Обоснование автора: A value bet needs worse hands to call each street; hands that can't bet the river are not value bets.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Playing 3-bet pots out of position (range splitting)
-
split_semibluff_part_strong_draws
Bet weaker draws on the flop, but only stronger draws (OESD, FD, gutshot+overcards) on the turn; on the river give up or bluff opponent-dependent. The draw range plays itself.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the semi-bluff part of the betting range
Условие: Building the semi-bluff part of your split range.
Обоснование автора: Draws barrel down with decreasing frequency as their equity/backup thins each street.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Playing 3-bet pots out of position (range splitting)
-
split_check_call_part_medium_plus_protection
Check-call medium value that can't bet 3 streets (top pair weak kicker, 2nd pairs, underpairs); PLUS protection (slowplayed sets blocking villain's value); PLUS some draws (FD+pair, FD+good ace-high) so the checking range isn't pure air.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the check-call part of the split range
Условие: Building the check-call part of your range.
Обоснование автора: Hands that can't bet 3 streets defend better as check-calls; mixing in sets/draws protects the range.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Playing 3-bet pots out of position (range splitting)
-
protect_your_checking_range
Protect it: betting every strong hand caps/weakens your check-call range and makes it exploitable; slowplay some top sets and keep some draws in the check-call to balance it.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: protecting the checking range
Условие: You bet all your strong hands, leaving a weak checking range.
Обоснование автора: An uncapped, balanced checking range stops villain from auto-attacking your checks.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Playing 3-bet pots out of position (range splitting)
-
pick_one_approach_apply_consistently
Pick ONE approach (split on flop OR range-bet flop then split turn) and apply the same logic consistently; blindly range-betting then playing turn/river randomly is the leak.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: consistency of the split approach
Условие: Playing 3-bet pots OOP street to street.
Обоснование автора: Random later-street play after a blind range-bet causes the big-pot mistakes.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Playing 3-bet pots out of position (range splitting)
-
concrete_mike_jj_should_check_kq4
Check (it's in the check-call range, not the range-bet); range-betting then calling down into trips is the leak.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: JJ in a 3bp OOP on K-Q-4
Условие: 3-bet pot OOP, JJ on K-Q-4: JJ can't bet 3 streets (beaten by Kx/Qx/AK/AQ).
Обоснование автора: JJ is medium value with no 3-street value bet; it belongs in the check-call part of the split.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Playing 3-bet pots out of position (range splitting)
Какие руки нельзя коллировать против 3бетов без позиции? Банк на $70к забрала актриса из Гриффинов! Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 6
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
low_connected_suited_worst_coldcall_vs_3bet_oop
Don't: these are the WORST cold-calls vs a 3-bet OOP due to reverse implied odds - dominated straights (16 combos of overstraight, e.g. AK on T-J-Q) and small flushes (3-bet ranges hold the bigger suited cards). You win small, lose big.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: 98s-type hands cold-calling a 3-bet OOP
Условие: You consider cold-calling a 3-bet OOP with a low connected/gappy suited hand (e.g. 98s).
Обоснование автора: Dominated straights/flushes give big reverse implied odds; you mostly miss and check-fold, and lose stacks when you hit.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
coldcall_3bets_only_nut_nondominated_combos
Only hands that make NUT/strong, non-dominated combos; avoid hands whose straights/flushes are second-best vs the 3-bet range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: what to cold-call a 3-bet with
Условие: Choosing which hands can cold-call a 3-bet OOP at all.
Обоснование автора: Vs a strong 3-bet range, dominated made hands cost more than they win.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
micro_coldcall_3bets_oop_super_narrow_rake
Cold-call almost nothing: rake makes flatting 3-bets OOP very -EV; even suited aces/broadways/pairs go to 4-bet or fold, not flat.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: cold-calling 3-bets OOP at micro stakes
Условие: Micro online stakes; facing a 3-bet out of position.
Обоснование автора: You pay rake on every continued pot; OOP that crushes a thin flatting range at micro.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
bigger_3bet_sizing_flat_fewer_hands
Flat even fewer hands: vs a large 3-bet from an early/free position, play only 4-bet or fold, essentially no flats.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: 3-bet sizing and your flatting range
Условие: The 3-bet sizing is large (9-10bb at micro vs 7.5bb).
Обоснование автора: Bigger sizing worsens your price and risk OOP, collapsing the flatting range to zero.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
river_bluffcatch_value_combos_first_recap
Count VALUE combos first: such a passive line has few value combos (sets/strong hands bet earlier or are bluff-catchers themselves) and many busted draws -> call.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: bluff-catching a passive line's river donk
Условие: Facing a river donk after a check-call/check-call line on a wet board.
Обоснование автора: A check-call/check-call/donk line is value-light and draw-heavy, so top pair bluff-catches profitably.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
concrete_98s_coldcall_and_tilly_call
The 98s cold-call is the leak (dominated draws / reverse implied odds); Tilly's river call with top pair is correct (the line has no credible value).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: 98s cold-calls a 3-bet OOP; top pair bluff-catches the river
Условие: 98s cold-calls Tilly's 3-bet OOP (double-belly-buster + FD on Q-T-6), then donk-bluffs the river into her QJ top pair.
Обоснование автора: 98s makes only dominated straights/flushes; the passive donk line is a value-light bluff she beats.
Review: trainer_candidate
3 правила хороших блефов на ривере. Амбассадор GGPoker Элки превратил в блеф топ-пару на ривере! Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
river_bluff_required_fold_equity_constants
Compare two numbers: required fold equity (a constant by bet size: 1/3->25%, 1/2->33%, 3/4->43%, pot->50%, 2x overbet->67%) vs real fold equity. Bluff is +EV when real > required.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the math of a +EV bluff
Условие: Deciding whether a bluff (any street) is +EV.
Обоснование автора: Required FE = bet/(pot+bet); memorize the constants and compare to how often villain actually folds.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: River bluffing (math + 3 rules)
-
estimate_real_fold_equity
Count villain's river combos and how many fold (10% per unit of N); online use fold-to-bet-by-street stats; add a ~5-7% margin for estimation error.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: estimating real fold equity
Условие: You need the second number (how often villain folds).
Обоснование автора: Real FE is the fold frequency of villain's actual range; margin protects against misreads.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: River bluffing (math + 3 rules)
-
call_instead_of_bluffing_when_call_is_plus_ev
Just call — do not turn a +EV calling hand into a bluff.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: don't bluff a hand that can profitably call
Условие: Your hand's equity exceeds the pot odds to call (a +EV bluff-catch).
Обоснование автора: If equity > pot odds the call already makes money; bluff-raising it forfeits that EV.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: River bluffing (math + 3 rules)
-
river_bluff_rule_1_into_weak_wide_ranges
Bluff into WEAK/WIDE ranges, not narrow/strong ones: people don't fold strong hands (top pair / two pair / sets), so don't bluff a villain who barreled or value-bet into you.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: rule 1 for river bluffs
Условие: Choosing whether to bluff the river.
Обоснование автора: Villains rarely fold strong hands (especially amateurs measuring absolute strength), so bluffing a strong/narrow range has little fold equity.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: River bluffing (math + 3 rules)
-
recognizing_weak_wide_ranges_by_line
Villain who checked or check-called is capped (he'd bet/raise strong hands) -> bluff; villain who keeps betting/barreling is strong -> do not bluff.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: reading a capped / weak range
Условие: Identifying when villain's range is weak and wide.
Обоснование автора: Passive lines cap the range to medium/weak hands, which is where bluffs print.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: River bluffing (math + 3 rules)
-
river_bluff_rule_2_with_unmade_hands
Bluff with UNMADE hands (busted draws, no showdown value), not made hands: you have plenty of busted draws by the river, and a made hand with showdown value should check and sometimes win.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: rule 2 for river bluffs
Условие: Choosing which hands to bluff with on the river.
Обоснование автора: Turning a hand with showdown value into a bluff over-bluffs and wastes its check-and-win equity.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: River bluffing (math + 3 rules)
-
river_bluff_rule_3_known_opponents_only
Bluff KNOWN opponents, not unknowns: bluffing is exploitative and needs reads. Vs unknowns, barrels skew to value (you are unknown to them too) and you lack info (could be a never-folding 'telephone', FE ~ 10%). Play straightforward.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: rule 3 for river bluffs
Условие: Considering a big river bluff against an opponent you don't have reads on.
Обоснование автора: Without reads you cannot estimate fold equity; a big river bluff vs an unknown is an expensive guess.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: River bluffing (math + 3 rules)
-
concrete_elky_bad_river_bluffraise
A bad bluff: it breaks all three rules (bluffs a strong/narrow range, uses a made hand with showdown value, vs an unknown). It only worked because Filatov folded TPTK.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Elky turns a bluff-catcher into a river check-raise bluff
Условие: Elky check-raises KT (a bluff-catcher with showdown value) big on a flush river, into Filatov's narrow/strong range (AK TPTK who barreled into 2 players then bet the flush), as a near-unknown.
Обоснование автора: Breaking all three river-bluff rules makes it -EV/marginal despite the result.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: River bluffing (math + 3 rules)
3 причины плохих коллов в покере. Михаил Minthon VS Алексей Avr0ra за банк 500bb! Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
range_analysis_primary_tells_secondary
Decide on ranges of bets and actions FIRST; tells and table-talk are secondary (~20%), used only at the end for close decisions — never the main basis.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: weighing range analysis vs physical tells / table talk
Условие: Making a tough call, especially live with visible tells / speeches.
Обоснование автора: Real decisions come from bet/action spectra; the James-Bond 'read the sweat' approach is a recreational myth.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Call/fold decision framework (value combos, no-bluff factors)
-
continuation_range_remove_strongest_earlier_raised
Remove the strongest hands he'd have raised earlier (he 4-bets AA/KK/AK pre), capping his call range to medium hands; then see what continues to the river.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: building villain's river continuation range
Условие: Estimating what villain continues with after calling earlier streets.
Обоснование автора: Prior-street actions remove combos; the river continuation range is much narrower and shaped by what he didn't raise earlier.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Call/fold decision framework (value combos, no-bluff factors)
-
count_value_combos_first_then_decide
Count value combos first: if villain has many value combos, the analysis ends -> fold. Compare pot odds (e.g. ~33% needed, +margin to ~40%) with how many worse hands actually continue.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: value-combo count drives the call decision
Условие: Facing a big river bet/jam with a bluff-catcher.
Обоснование автора: With a value-heavy continuation range and few bluffs, the bluff-catch fails the pot-odds threshold.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Call/fold decision framework (value combos, no-bluff factors)
-
discount_bluffs_low_frequency_and_card_helps_hero
Discount bluffs further: busted draws bluff at low frequency, and a card that also improves your range makes villain bluff even less.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: adjusting villain's bluff frequency
Условие: The few candidate bluffs are busted draws, and the river card also helps your perceived range.
Обоснование автора: Bluff frequency, not just bluff count, matters; cards that help hero reduce villain's incentive to bluff.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Call/fold decision framework (value combos, no-bluff factors)
-
bad_call_reason_fear_of_being_bluffed
Recognize fear of being shown a bluff (ego / 'what will they think') as a psychological leak; fix with mental-game work, not by calling.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: psychological reason 1 for bad calls
Условие: You are tempted to call despite knowing you are likely behind.
Обоснование автора: Many bad calls are ego-driven (avoid being shown a bluff and mocked), not strategy-driven.
Review: concept
Кластер: Why players make bad calls (psychology + technique)
-
bad_call_reason_curiosity
Recognize curiosity / desire to be right as a leak; it is not worth the call's cost when you already know you are behind.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: psychological reason 2 for bad calls
Условие: You want to 'confirm' you are beaten / see villain's cards.
Обоснование автора: Curiosity and the desire to be right push unjustified calls that burn money.
Review: concept
Кластер: Why players make bad calls (psychology + technique)
-
bad_call_reason_weak_technique
The fundamental fix is technique: read initial vs continuation ranges and compare pot odds to equity; with study you see 'there are no bluffs -> fold'.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: strategic reason 3 for bad calls
Условие: You cannot tell whether a spot has enough bluffs.
Обоснование автора: Weak range-reading/math makes borderline spots feel unclear; studied players just fold the no-bluff spots.
Review: concept
Кластер: Why players make bad calls (psychology + technique)
-
concrete_minton_k9_fold_vs_avrora_jam
Fold: pot odds ~33% need ~40% worse hands; the value-heavy continuation range does not provide them. (Villain shows TT.)
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: K9 top pair vs a value-heavy river donk-jam
Условие: 3-bet pot, K9 top pair on 9-6-7-3-4; villain donk-jams the river; his continuation range is TT+/straights/sets with few low-frequency bluffs.
Обоснование автора: Top pair is a bluff-catcher with no bluffs to catch; calling is -EV. Avrora shows pocket tens.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Call/fold decision framework (value combos, no-bluff factors)
Как играть слабые пары в покере - чеком или бетом? Банк на $20 000 #poker #покер #филатов #nlholdem Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
bet_weak_pairs_ip_to_deny_equity
Bet to DENY equity (steal equity), not for thin value: bet when it folds out hands with 6+ live outs against you (overcards) and villain folds enough; otherwise check and take showdown value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: weak made hand (2nd/3rd pair, weak SDV) in position
Условие: In position with a weak made hand (2nd/3rd pair) facing a check.
Обоснование автора: The reason to bet weak-SDV hands is to burn opponents' live outs and bluff equity, not to get called by worse.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
bet_purpose_for_weak_sdv_is_steal_equity
Frame the bet as equity denial: a bet that folds out 6-out overcards (or 9-out flush draws) is profitable even with no value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the bet purpose for weak showdown-value hands
Условие: You have a weak hand with some showdown value and consider betting.
Обоснование автора: Weak SDV hands don't bet for value; their bet earns by denying opponents' realization + bluff equity.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
flushdraw_boards_more_reason_to_bet_weak_pairs
Lean toward betting: it folds out flush draws (9 outs), denying more equity than on a dry board.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: weak pairs on flush-draw boards
Условие: Flush-draw board; you have a weak pair in position.
Обоснование автора: Folding out a 9-out flush draw is a large equity denial, strengthening the bet.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
count_outs_denied_to_decide_bet_or_check
Count how many hands with enough outs (6+, or 9+ on FD boards) your bet folds out: many AND villain folds enough -> bet; few -> check.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: deciding bet vs check by outs denied
Условие: Choosing whether to bet a weak made hand in position.
Обоснование автора: Equity denial scales with the outs you remove and how often villain folds.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
required_fold_equity_recap_for_denial_bets
Recall required fold equity by size (1/3 -> 25%, 1/2 -> 33%); if villain folds more than that, the denial bet is +EV.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: required fold equity for the denial bet
Условие: Sizing the equity-denial bet.
Обоснование автора: Even a pure equity-denial bet must clear its required fold equity to print.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
active_beats_passive_with_not_yet_strong_hands
Play actively (bet/raise to deny equity and gain fold equity) rather than passively calling to draw; passive lines get bluffed and let villain realize equity.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: active vs passive with not-yet-strong hands
Условие: You hold a not-yet-strong hand (small pair drawing to a set, weak pair).
Обоснование автора: Passive call-downs surrender fold equity and realization; aggression with backdoors is higher-EV.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
deep_river_bluffcatch_value_combos_first
Count VALUE combos first (not aggression). On a wet flop+turn a competent villain rarely checks sets (would protect/charge draws), so discount sets after a turn check -> few value combos -> the call can be +EV; your own weird line invites bluffs.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: deep river bluff-catch
Условие: Facing a river jam deep; deciding to call.
Обоснование автора: Sets bet wet boards to protect, so a turn check caps villain's value; value-combo count drives the call.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
concrete_filatov_33_passive_leak
The leak was the passive flop/turn (should bet/raise 33's backdoors to deny equity), not the river set-over-set call (a reasonable bluff-catch given the discounted value).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: 33 plays too passively into set-over-set
Условие: 33 on 7-8-2 in position vs QQ; check-call flop, check turn, river makes bottom set vs top set.
Обоснование автора: Passive play let villain realize and bluff; the river cooler is rare and not the real mistake.
Review: trainer_candidate
4 фактора для плюсовых коллов не по шансам. Анатолий Филатов выкинул флеш в 3бет поте и увидел блеф! Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
implied_odds_justify_calls_without_direct_odds
Calling can still be +EV via implied odds — the extra money you win when you hit, beyond the current pot.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: calling a draw without direct pot odds
Условие: Your unmade draw lacks the direct pot odds to call.
Обоснование автора: When direct pot odds fall short, implied odds (future winnings on hit) can make the call profitable.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Implied odds, reverse implied odds and deep hand selection
-
four_factors_of_implied_odds
Weigh 4 factors: 1) opponent's remaining stack (deeper -> higher); 2) position (IP -> higher, easier to get paid); 3) opponent type (fish who can't fold -> higher, strong reg -> lower); 4) draw disguise (hidden gutshot/OESD -> higher, obvious flush -> lower).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: estimating implied odds
Условие: Deciding whether implied odds justify a draw call.
Обоснование автора: Stack depth, position, opponent type and how readable your draw is together set how much extra you can win on a hit.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Implied odds, reverse implied odds and deep hand selection
-
reverse_implied_odds_dominated_draws
Account for reverse implied odds: a small flush vs a bigger flush, or a flush draw on a pairing board vs a full house, loses extra money — discount these draws.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: drawing to a dominated hand
Условие: You draw to a small/dominated hand (small flush, low straight) that can lose a big pot.
Обоснование автора: When your made draw is often second-best, the extra money flows the other way; reverse implied odds make these draws much worse.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Implied odds, reverse implied odds and deep hand selection
-
open_high_implied_odds_hands_avoid_small_suited_connectors_deep
Open hands with high implied odds (suited A/K/Q, nut-straight broadways like QJ/QT/JT); avoid small suited connectors (97/87/76/64s) from early position — they have reverse implied odds (dominated flushes/straights).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hand selection deep (200-300bb+)
Условие: Deep stacks (200bb+); choosing which hands to open, especially from early position.
Обоснование автора: Deep, action gives you dominated second-best hands; open only hands that make the nuts/second-nuts.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Implied odds, reverse implied odds and deep hand selection
-
initial_range_is_not_continuation_range
Distinguish the initial range (what villain arrived with, e.g. his check-call range) from the continuation range (what he continues with vs your bet). He folds half-or-more of the initial range to a bet.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: cornerstone: range arrived-with vs range continued-with
Условие: Deciding whether to value-bet a street.
Обоснование автора: People do not continue with their whole arriving range; the range that calls a bet is much narrower.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Value-bet against the continuation range, not the initial range
-
value_bet_vs_continuation_range_not_initial
Bet for value only if you beat the CONTINUATION range (what calls), not the initial range — often you have value vs initial but not vs what continues.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: checking whether you actually have a value bet
Условие: You appear to beat villain's initial range and consider a thin value bet.
Обоснование автора: A value bet needs worse hands to call; if only better hands continue, there is no value even though the initial range had worse hands.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Value-bet against the continuation range, not the initial range
-
avoid_value_owning_yourself
Do not 'value-own yourself' — betting thin when the continuation range beats you means you get called only by better. Check instead when there is no value-vs-continuation.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the key thin-value mistake
Условие: Considering a thin value bet on turn/river.
Обоснование автора: Thin value into a calling range that beats you loses money; this is the core barreling mistake.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Value-bet against the continuation range, not the initial range
-
concrete_filatov_small_flush_bet_pass
Bet/pass (bet then fold to the jam) or check — no thin value here; and you should not have opened 64s (reverse implied odds) into this spot.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: small flush on river in a 3-bet pot, deep
Условие: 3-bet pot, deep; you make a small flush; villain's check-jam range is nut flushes + full houses; you have no value vs the continuation range.
Обоснование автора: The jam range is nut flushes/fulls; the small flush is a bluff-catcher at best, and the whole mess started by opening a reverse-implied-odds hand.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Value-bet against the continuation range, not the initial range
3 фишки для хороших пасов сильных рук. Фолд фулл-хауса на ривере за банк $17 375 от француза Ютубера Полностью 10/10
Перечисленные правила 7
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
three_factors_for_hero_folding_strong_hands
Hero-fold when three factors stack: a multiway pot with a strong line; deep stacks; and you are up against an uncapped range. Each reduces villain's bluffs and worse value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: when you can hero-fold a strong hand
Условие: You hold a strong-by-absolute-strength hand (small full house, nut flush) facing big aggression.
Обоснование автора: Together these factors mean villain almost never has a bluff or a worse hand, so your strong hand is a bluff-catcher.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Hero-folding strong hands
-
factor_multiway_strong_line_means_value
Treat multiway strong lines as value-heavy: c-bet/raise/value frequencies into 2+ players are far more value than heads-up, so fewer bluffs.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 1: multiway + strong line
Условие: The action developed multiway (check-raise + calls) and continues into two or more players.
Обоснование автора: Stats show c-bet ~75-80% HU but much lower multiway; betting into multiple players needs real value.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Hero-folding strong hands
-
factor_deep_stacks_reduce_bluffs
Discount bluffs further: deep, most players bluff and overplay worse hands rarely; only the best apply deep-stack pressure, so a deep river jam skews to value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 2: deep stacks
Условие: Stacks are deep (150-200bb+).
Обоснование автора: Deep-stack aggression from a typical player is value-weighted; few create deep bluff pressure.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Hero-folding strong hands
-
factor_betting_into_uncapped_range
Your strong-but-not-nut hand is a bluff-catcher here; count the nut combos that beat you (often ~10) before betting/calling.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 3: uncapped opponent range
Условие: You are betting/raising into an uncapped range (e.g. the original raiser who holds all the nuts: AA/AT/TT/quads).
Обоснование автора: An uncapped range contains the nuts and second-nuts that dominate your strong-but-not-nut hand.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Hero-folding strong hands
-
measure_hand_relative_to_range_not_absolute
Measure your hand RELATIVE to villain's range, not by absolute strength: a small full house or a nut flush on a paired board can be 2nd-best vs an uncapped range -> fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the core hero-fold insight
Условие: You feel a hand is 'too strong to fold' (full house, nut flush).
Обоснование автора: Amateurs measure absolute strength ('full house = unfoldable'); relative-to-range is what matters.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Hero-folding strong hands
-
competent_opponents_have_nuts_in_fold_inducing_lines
Respect it: a thinking villain who escalates into your bet across a multiway, deep spot rarely bluffs; he can have the nuts.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: respecting a thinking opponent's big line
Условие: A competent opponent gives multiway action then keeps raising/jamming into you.
Обоснование автора: Good players who pile money in multiway/deep are weighted to value; their big lines are credible.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Hero-folding strong hands
-
concrete_youtuber_folds_small_full_house
Fold: the small full house is a bluff-catcher vs an uncapped, multiway, deep, value-heavy range — a good hero-fold despite its absolute strength.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: folding a lower full house on the river
Условие: You hold a small full house (99 on A-T-T-9) facing the original raiser's river jam; he is uncapped with TT/AT/AA/quads.
Обоснование автора: All three factors (multiway, deep, uncapped) plus ~10 nut combos make the small boat a fold.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Hero-folding strong hands
Покер Про сделал суши из азиатского миллионера. Золотое правило тонких велью-бетов #покер #poker Legacy gap 10/10
Есть ограничение
- checklist intake=true, но term_proposals.jsonl не найден
Перечисленные правила 10
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
thin_value_vs_bluff_card
Do not use this card for thin value with a marginal made hand. If the card makes weaker hands fold, it is structurally bad for thin value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero improves on river; villain checks; hero considers thin value bet
Условие: River card is a scare card that is good for bluffing because villain is expected to fold many weaker hands.
Обоснование автора: Cards suitable for bluffs are usually unsuitable for thin value bets, because thin value needs worse hands to continue.
Review: concept
Кластер: River thin value on a scare card after capped line, River thin value (scare cards)
-
blank_card_thin_value
This card can support thin value, but is usually a poor bluffing card.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero reaches river with a marginal made hand and villain checks
Условие: River card is relatively blank and villain is expected to call with worse bluff-catchers such as second, third, or fourth pair.
Обоснование автора: If worse hands continue often, thin value is plausible; the same card is not a strong candidate for frequent bluffs.
Review: concept
Кластер: River thin value on a scare card after capped line, River thin value (scare cards)
-
avoid_thin_value_on_scare_overcard_or_completed_draw
Avoid thin value. This is a better bluff card than value card.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero improves on a scare river card and considers betting thin value
Условие: River brings an overcard or completes a draw such as a flush, and hero expects frequent folds from weaker pairs.
Обоснование автора: Weaker second, third, and fourth pairs are less likely to call when the scare card credibly improves hero.
Review: concept
Кластер: River thin value on a scare card after capped line, River thin value (scare cards)
-
capped_hero_range_vs_uncapped_villain
Be very cautious with thin value. A capped hero range against an uncapped villain range is a major negative factor.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero c-bets flop, checks back turn, then considers river thin value after improving
Условие: Hero's previous line removes many strong value hands from hero's range, while villain's line can still contain sets, two pair, straights, or stronger river improvements.
Обоснование автора: When hero would usually bet strong hands earlier, villain can attack capped river bets more credibly and can also show up with more strong hands.
Review: concept
Кластер: River thin value on a scare card after capped line, River thin value (scare cards)
-
river_check_raise_after_thin_value_population_fold
Fold marginal/thin value hands to a large river check-raise. Population check-raises in this line are usually underbluffed.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero c-bets flop, checks back turn, bets thin value river, villain check-raises large
Условие: Villain is not known to overbluff and can have strong hands in the river check-raise range.
Обоснование автора: Thin value and merged value hands perform poorly against raises; without notes, the line is expected to contain too many stronger value hands and too few bluffs.
Review: concept
Кластер: River thin value on a scare card after capped line, River thin value (scare cards)
-
underbet_exception_on_scare_card
If betting thin value on a scare card, strongly reduce sizing. Avoid half-pot, two-thirds, or three-quarter-pot value bets.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero improves on a scare card but still wants thin value
Условие: Hero expects standard value sizes to get too many folds from worse hands, but wants to target curiosity calls or excellent pot odds calls.
Обоснование автора: A very small bet can make weaker hands continue because of pot odds even when the card is scary.
Review: concept
Кластер: River thin value on a scare card after capped line, River thin value (scare cards)
-
thin_value_vs_passive_curious_recreational
Small thin value bet is acceptable. If this opponent check-raises, fold comfortably.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero makes very small thin value bet on scary river card
Условие: Villain is a passive curious recreational player who calls small bets out of curiosity but rarely turns hands into bluffs.
Обоснование автора: Passive curious players may call too wide versus small bets, but their raises remain value-heavy.
Review: concept
Кластер: River thin value on a scare card after capped line, River thin value (scare cards)
-
thin_value_induce_vs_aggressive_overbluffer
Small value bet can be used to induce. If raised, call instead of bet-folding.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero makes very small thin value bet on scary river card
Условие: Villain is very aggressive, overbluffs, and is provoked by small bets into raising too many weak hands.
Обоснование автора: Against this profile, the purpose of the small bet shifts from getting called by worse to inducing bluffs and thin/merged aggression.
Review: concept
Кластер: River thin value on a scare card after capped line, River thin value (scare cards)
-
avoid_thin_value_when_villain_has_many_better_same_card_arrivals
Avoid or downgrade thin value. Prefer check back unless sizing and villain profile make a bet clearly profitable.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero improves to one pair on river and considers thin value
Условие: The river card that improves hero also improves many villain hands to the same pair with better kickers or stronger made hands.
Обоснование автора: Even when worse hands can call, value deteriorates if villain has many stronger versions of the same river improvement.
Review: concept
Кластер: River thin value on a scare card after capped line, River thin value (scare cards)
-
thin_value_when_villain_lacks_better_arrivals
Thin value becomes more attractive.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero c-bets flop, turn checks/checks through or continues to river, then improves on river
Условие: Villain's previous range construction contains few better hands that improve on the same river card, while hero can credibly have a good river improvement.
Обоснование автора: The video contrasts bad thin value spots with cases where the caller's flop range has few top-pair arrivals on the river.
Review: concept
Кластер: River thin value on a scare card after capped line, River thin value (scare cards)
Why Pocket Jacks Are Actually Hard to Play Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 19
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
ip_vs_aggro_3bettor_polarized_4bet_flat_middling
Play a POLARIZED 4bet: 4bet only the very best (AA/KK/AKs) + a few Ax/Kx-suited bluffs; FLAT middling hands like JJ/AQs. Being IP incentivizes calling, so don't 4bet the middle of your range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: in position facing a 3bet from an aggressive player
Условие: Hero IP vs an aggressive wide 3bettor.
Обоснование автора: IP realizes equity well and can profitably flat; 4betting middling hands folds out worse and gets called by better while forfeiting position's flatting incentive.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
iso_big_size_condenses_villain_3bet_range
Treat villain's 3bet range as relatively TIGHT/condensed despite his image; just call JJ, don't 4bet. Big ISO over limpers deters light 3bets.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero ISO-raised big over limpers, then got 3bet
Условие: Hero isolated over 1-2 limpers with a BIG size and faces a 3bet, even from an aggressive player.
Обоснование автора: A big iso over limpers already represents strength, so even aggressive players 3bet it linearly; the configuration, not the player's general aggression, sets the range width.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
big_ep_open_then_ep_3bet_is_very_tight_fold_jj_to_barrels
Range is very tight/condensed (overpairs + big draws like AK/AQ-suited). Alarm bells. Check-call flop, then FOLD JJ to the double barrel. Pool under-3bets big EP opens and under-double-barrels as the pot grows.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero opened big (6x) from EP, got 3bet by an EP player, faces flop+turn barrels
Условие: Hero opened LARGE from early position and an early-position player 3bet; villain double-barrels.
Обоснование автора: Contrast rule to r-wide configs: a big EP-vs-EP line is the tightest configuration, so a bluff-catcher like JJ has almost no showdown value by the turn.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
no_checkraise_medium_made_vs_condensed_3bettor
Do NOT check-raise. A small size doesn't widen a 3bettor's range; you value-own yourself — no worse hands call, and better hands just fold their equity (fine, but not why you raise).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero (3bet caller OOP) faces a small flop c-bet from a condensed 3bettor range
Условие: Villain is the 3bettor with a condensed/overpair-heavy range and c-bets small; hero has a medium made hand (JJ, underpair to top).
Обоснование автора: Check-raising for value needs worse hands to call; against a condensed range there are none, so raising only isolates you against better.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
cold_4bet_or_fold_not_cold_call_3bets
Play cold-4bet-or-fold; do NOT cold-call 3bets. Cold-calling gets you squeezed preflop and leaves bad relative position postflop. With the dead money, cold-4bet JJ+ linearly for value; if 5bet, fold (that's aces).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: a 3bet plus a cold-call are in front of hero (dead money)
Условие: Facing a 3bet (and often a cold-call adding dead money).
Обоснование автора: Cold-calling a 3bet invites a squeeze and forfeits initiative; the dead money makes a linear cold-4bet high-EV, and villain's 5bet is almost purely aces.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
relative_position_value_calling_last_vs_aggressor
Value relative position (seeing the other players act before you after the aggressor's c-bet), not just absolute position; it can make an otherwise-marginal cold-call playable.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero acts after the preflop aggressor (relative position) even when cold-calling
Условие: Hero will act AFTER the preflop 4bettor/aggressor postflop (last relative to the aggressor).
Обоснование автора: Acting after the aggressor lets you see intervening players' responses before committing, which is worth more than raw seat order.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
static_dry_board_check_back_range_exception_to_range_bet
Exception to range-betting: build a CHECK-BACK range here. Check back a hand like JJ on a paired top-card board, planning to bet turn+river for value from sticky showdown-value hands. Overbet-or-check on ace-high static boards.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero is PFR IP on a static dry (ace-high or top-card-paired) board
Условие: Static, dry board (A-high or paired top card) as the PFR IP.
Обоснование автора: On static boards little equity shifts, so a check-back range induces stabs and disguises strong hands; range-betting these boards forfeits that.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
paired_topcard_turn_bet_small_keep_weak_pairs
Size the turn SMALL (half pot or less) to keep the weak pairs in; a big bet folds out exactly the hands paying you off.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: double-barrel on a paired top-card board when an overcard arrives
Условие: Paired top-card board; hero barrels the turn and an overcard comes; villain's range is weak pairs (4x-9x) plus occasional traps.
Обоснование автора: Value comes from sticky weak pairs; small sizing maximizes their continuation when a scare overcard would otherwise give them an excuse to fold.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
deep_vs_fish_check_to_induce_monkey_stab
Check (even strong hands) to induce the fish's 'monkey stab' — he'll put you on AK and stab his air; you keep his bluffs in and let him bet your value for you.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: deep / high-SPR pot vs a fish who overstabs and telegraphs
Условие: High/infinite SPR vs a recreational villain who overstabs, telegraphs strength with size, and doesn't protect his check-back range.
Обоснование автора: A fish who stabs when checked to and telegraphs when he bets gives more EV to checking; leading folds out his air.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
bluffing_fish_tell_them_twice
'Tell them twice': one bet won't move a sticky pair; plan two streets of pressure (big turn + big river) to fold it — and inversely, when value-betting them, get greedy with size because they call twice.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: trying to fold a sticky recreational pair off its hand
Условие: Bluffing (or value-betting thin vs) a sticky fish who calls one bet with any pair.
Обоснование автора: Recreational players anchor to one-street reads; a single bet reads as standard and gets called, two big bets are needed to represent enough to fold a pair.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
turn_made_hand_into_bluff_when_zero_sdv
Turn the hand into a bluff: bet/overbet to fold the foldable better hands. Goal stated explicitly as 'fold out queens and kings', not to get called.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: river with a made hand (JJ) that now beats almost nothing
Условие: Enumerating villain's range shows hero beats almost none of it (showdown value ~0) AND villain holds foldable second-best hands (KK/QQ, missed non-flush aces).
Обоснование автора: A made hand with no showdown value has the same 0 checking-EV as air, so bluffing it is correct when villain has hands that can fold.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
monotone_board_small_cbet_checkback_uncapped_river_bluff
C-bet small on the flop; when a fourth flush card comes, CHECK BACK the turn (villain uncapped for the flush); on the river turn the hand into a bluff to fold everything but a made flush / the blocker card.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: monotone (three-suit) flop, PFR IP; then a further flush card
Условие: Monotone flop where villain is UNCAPPED (can hold made flushes and nut-flush draws).
Обоснование автора: Against an uncapped monotone range you can't barrel for value; small c-bet + check-back controls the pot and sets up a credible river bluff.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
multistreet_sizing_confluence_thin_river_checkraise
Stack the clues, not any single one: the confluence leaves ~12% of his original strong combos, so a thin river check-raise (as a bluff) rarely runs into a monster.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: villain checked back flop, medium turn, small river — stacked sizing clues
Условие: Villain checks back the flop, uses a medium turn size, then a small river size; each action halves his strong-hand combos.
Обоснование автора: No single sizing tell is conclusive, but multiplying independent reductions in strong combos across streets makes the aggregate confidently capped.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
blockers_misapplied_need_foldable_range
Do NOT jam for blockers here — misapplied. Blockers matter only when they block the FEW strong combos AND villain can actually fold. Neither holds at low SPR vs a committed range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: jamming a turn 'for blockers' in a low-SPR 4bet pot
Условие: Low-SPR 4bet pot; hero blocks a straight/nut combo but villain's range is overpairs/sets/top-pair that will never fold.
Обоснование автора: A blocker only generates fold equity if it removes value combos villain would otherwise have AND villain has a fold in his range; low SPR removes the fold.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
blockers_correctly_applied_block_the_few_nuts
Correctly apply blockers: turn the hand into a bluff (big bet / overbet) — blocking the few nut combos makes it hard for villain to continue and hard for you to be bluffing.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: A-Q-T board, hero holds a card blocking villain's only strong combos
Условие: Board (e.g. AQT) where villain's ONLY strong combos are AQ/QQ/AA/TT and hero blocks one of them; overbet-or-check line available.
Обоснование автора: Blockers work when they remove the scarce strong combos and the board lets you credibly rep them; the mirror image of r014.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
stack_depth_changes_overpair_fold_equity
This works DEEP (~300bb) on a connected board with few sets/combo-draws — overpairs get squeamish and fold; it FAILS shallow (<=150bb) or on flush-heavy boards where an overpair is effectively the nuts and never folds. Same play, opposite verdict by stack depth + texture.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: jamming a turn into likely overpairs, deep vs shallow
Условие: Hero jams a turn representing straights/sets/two-pair vs a range that is ~90% overpairs.
Обоснование автора: Fold equity vs an overpair is a function of SPR and board: deep + connected gives the overpair a reason and room to fold; shallow makes it committed.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
no_5bet_range_deep_vs_regs_simplify
Have NO 5bet range vs thinking regs when deep IP: only AA is comfortable 5betting for value at 300bb and balancing bluffs + protecting the 4bet-call range is too hard — simplify to 4bet-or-call. Against a FISH, ignore this: 5bet AA for value (he never folds his KK/QQ anyway).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero 4bet, faces a 5bet from a thinking reg while deep IP
Условие: ~300bb deep, IP, vs a thinking regular who 5bets.
Обоснование автора: Deep, a value 5bet range is nearly all AA and cannot be balanced without weakening the 4bet-call range; simplification beats a leaky balanced attempt. Fish don't punish the imbalance.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
carry_range_thread_street_to_street
Carry one consistent range thread street to street: update villain's range with each action instead of re-reading from scratch each new card. Poke at 'what if I choose this size / check back' against the updated range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: range reading across streets
Условие: Any multi-street hand.
Обоснование автора: Consistency across streets is what lets sizing/timing tells accumulate into a confident read; restarting each street discards information.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
3bet_bigger_for_value_vs_fish_ip
3bet BIGGER for value than standard — fish call way too much IP and will put you on AK regardless, so extract more; don't fear folding them out.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: fish opens IP, hero 3bets from the blinds with a strong hand
Условие: A recreational player opens in position and calls too much; hero has a hand well ahead of that calling range.
Обоснование автора: Against an inelastic wide calling range, larger sizing is pure value with little added fold-out of worse.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
90% of Hands Aren't the Nuts or Air (How the Best Players Play Them) Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 20
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
showdown_value_definition_configuration_dependent
Judge showdown value from the CONFIGURATION (how wide both ranges are) and the villain type, not from absolute hand strength. Same hand class flips between value/SDV/air across configurations.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: classify hand as value / bluff / showdown value before choosing a line
Условие: Hand would win >0% at showdown right now. The BAR for this depends on the range configuration: wide-vs-wide (e.g. BTN open vs BB defend, SRP) lowers it drastically — even weak ace-high qualifies; a tight configuration (cold-4bet pot, nit's 3bet) removes it — even an overpair-to-second-pair or JJ vs a king-high 3bet board may have NO showdown value.
Обоснование автора: Showdown value is relative to the hands villain actually arrives with; a wide arriving range contains enough worse made hands and floats for weak holdings to win at showdown, a tight one does not.
Review: concept
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
live_sizing_telegraph_adjusts_showdown_value
Big sizings are weighted to strong made hands (they 'protect' with big bets) -> downgrade your marginal hand's showdown value; small/medium sizings contain far more weak/marginal hands -> keep it.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: villain's chosen bet size re-classifies our hand
Условие: Live low/mid-stakes villain chooses a size: pot-size / big on a wet dynamic board vs 50-60% or smaller.
Обоснование автора: Live players put too many good hands into the big-size bucket and too many weak/marginal hands into small-medium sizes, especially on wet dynamic boards - the size telegraphs the range.
Review: needs_context
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
showdown_value_goal_get_to_showdown
The ONLY goal is to get to showdown. Explicitly NOT goals: charging draws, avoiding a tough river decision, folding out better, getting called by worse.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: whole-hand plan once hand is classified as showdown value
Условие: Hand classified as showdown value (not value, not bluff).
Обоснование автора: A hand that wins >0% at showdown monetizes that share only by arriving there; betting it turns it into a bluff that folds out worse and gets called by better.
Review: concept
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
no_monkey_bet_turn_with_showdown_value
Do not auto-barrel ('monkey bet'). Check. Fear-driven protection betting with showdown value is the #1 mistake with this hand class.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: turn checked to hero (IP after flop c-bet, or OOP after flop checks through)
Условие: Hero holds showdown value on the turn and feels the urge to bet 'to protect', 'to charge draws', 'to avoid a river decision' or 'to take it down now'.
Обоснование автора: Betting SDV accomplishes none of the stated goals: draws call profitably anyway, better hands never fold, worse hands fold - it only builds a pot the hand cannot win at showdown pricing.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
pfr_flop_range_bet_small_includes_sdv_hu
Range-bet small with the entire range - value, bluffs AND showdown value alike; divergence by hand class starts on the TURN, not the flop.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero is the preflop raiser, heads-up, checked to on the flop
Условие: HU pot as the PFR on most flops (explicitly NOT multiway).
Обоснование автора: Simplification argument (NOT a pool-overfold exploit): a simple strategy executed well outperforms a complex one executed mediocrely; range betting forces opponents into practiced nodes and is hard to exploit even for good players.
Review: needs_context
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
no_range_bet_multiway
Do NOT range-bet multiway; check much more (explicit: 'I am not range betting when we are multi-way').
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero is the preflop raiser, multiway flop
Условие: Pot is multiway.
Обоснование автора: Multiway betting ranges must be stronger; the range-bet simplification only applies HU.
Review: concept
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
oop_srp_check_a_lot
Check a lot ('big fan of checking quite a bit from out of position, especially in single raised pots').
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero is the preflop raiser out of position in a single-raised pot
Условие: OOP as PFR, single-raised pot.
Обоснование автора: OOP realization is poor; the range-bet simplification is an IP tool.
Review: concept
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
turn_sdv_ip_check_back
Check back. Take the free card / control the pot toward showdown.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: IP with showdown value, checked to on the turn
Условие: Hero IP on the turn, hand classified as showdown value (config + sizing say so).
Обоснование автора: Betting folds out worse and gets called by better; checking keeps villain's worse hands in and reaches showdown at the right price.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
turn_sdv_oop_check_call
Check with intent to CHECK-CALL a reasonable stab; do not lead.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: OOP with showdown value on the turn
Условие: Hero OOP on the turn with showdown value (e.g. small pair after flop checked through).
Обоснование автора: After the flop checks through, a stab is weighted toward weaker hands and floats; SDV beats enough of that range to call once, while leading turns the hand into a bluff.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
river_sdv_call_vs_small_sizing
Lean CALL with showdown value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero checked back turn with SDV; villain bets river
Условие: Villain's river bet is <= ~60% pot (especially after the turn checked through).
Обоснование автора: When the turn checks through, players get greedy with thin value AND their small-size region carries relatively more bluffs; <=60% pot is priced to bluff-catch.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
river_sdv_call_vs_snap_bet_on_nut_change
Lean CALL with showdown value: real value that just got there pauses to pick a size; an instant bet is weighted to bluffs seizing the scare card.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: scare card completes the obvious draw and villain bets instantly
Условие: The nuts change on the river (e.g. flush completes) and villain SNAP-bets with no pause.
Обоснование автора: A hand that improved to the new nuts has a sizing decision to make and takes a moment; bluffs move fast to avoid scrutiny.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
river_sdv_call_vs_lazy_double_sizing
Lean CALL with showdown value: the lazy 2x size is what bluffs pick to decide fast and not look suspicious; value tends to deliberate toward a precise get-called size.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: villain bets river exactly 2x his previous-street bet
Условие: River bet is precisely double the turn bet (e.g. 50 -> 100).
Обоснование автора: Bluffers minimize time under pressure; value bettors optimize the size. Exact-double is the low-effort default.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
river_sdv_call_in_wide_config_with_missed_draws
Get sticky - CALL with showdown value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: wide-vs-wide pot reaches the river with busted draws in villain's range
Условие: Wide-vs-wide configuration and villain's arriving range contains many natural bluffs (busted flush draws, gutshots, floated ace-highs) without showdown value.
Обоснование автора: Bluff-catching profits exactly when villain arrives with hands that can only win by betting.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
river_sdv_fold_vs_large_sizing
Lean FOLD with showdown value: this pool under-bluffs the big sizings - the bigger they go, the fewer bluffs, even though theory says the opposite.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: villain bets big on the river
Условие: Villain's river size is > ~60% pot.
Обоснование автора: If villain under-bluffs the size, every bluff catcher performs better as a fold than a call.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
river_absolute_size_trumps_relative
Treat absolute size as the stronger signal than pot-relative size: big-money bets are value-weighted; lean FOLD showdown value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: villain's river bet is huge in absolute money for the game
Условие: The bet is big for the STAKES (e.g. 100bb+ river jam) even if only ~60% pot relative.
Обоснование автора: 'Cash talks': live players feel absolute dollars, not pot fractions; they rarely put a stack in without a hand.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
river_sdv_fold_in_tight_config_no_natural_bluffs
FOLD showdown value: enumerate his natural bluffs - if they all got there or never existed, the bet is value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: tight-config 3-bet pot; the obvious draws completed; villain bets river
Условие: Tight configuration (e.g. early-position vs early-position 3-bet pot) and the runout completed villain's natural semibluffs (flush/straight got there), leaving no plausible missed bluffs.
Обоснование автора: Bluff-catching requires bluffs; a tight arriving range on a connecting runout has none.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
turn_sdv_into_bluff_higher_bar_only_vs_linear
Only then turn showdown value into a bluff; the bar is much higher than bluffing air because the bluff must outperform calling (which wins >0%). Against a polar range, take the showdown value (call or fold).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: deciding whether to raise-bluff a river bet while holding downgraded showdown value
Условие: Two conditions BOTH required: (1) the runout + villain's line have downgraded your showdown value to ~zero (calling wins almost nothing); (2) villain's range is LINEAR / capped / thin-value-weighted. Never vs a polarized range.
Обоснование автора: Bluffing air risks nothing at showdown; bluffing SDV sacrifices real showdown equity, so it needs a capped/linear target that can fold the hands currently beating you. A polar range calls with its value and has already folded its air.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
raise_thin_value_milkers_after_turn_checkback
Good target to turn downgraded showdown value into a bluff-raise - get the thin-value region off its hand on a scary board.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: villain checked back the turn, then bets SMALL on a scare river
Условие: Villain's line = check back turn + small river bet: that combination is thin value milking (AK/AA type), not traps (traps size up) and not the completed draws.
Обоснование автора: Check-back-turn + small-river rules out both slowplayed monsters and busted draws; what remains is one-pair thin value that folds to a raise on a frightening runout.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
river_sdv_check_first_air_bets
With SDV: CHECK first - if it checks through you often win; only vs a bet from a capped opponent consider a check-raise bluff. With air: just bet, because checking wins nothing. Never lead-'monkey bet' SDV into the river.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: river after passive turn; choosing between betting and checking with SDV vs with air
Условие: Hand is showdown value (would win a decent share if it checks through) vs pure air (wins nothing if it checks through).
Обоснование автора: SDV's checking EV is positive (it wins showdowns), so bluffing must clear a higher bar; air's checking EV is zero, so betting dominates.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
fourbet_pot_cbet_sizing_asides
Default very small (~10% pot) on ace-high boards; size UP (~half pot) on low boards.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero is the 4-bettor on the flop
Условие: 4-bet pot as the preflop 4-bettor: ace-high boards vs low boards.
Обоснование автора: Stated as an aside ('neither here nor there'), not argued in this video; parked at low confidence.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
You’re STILL Playing 3-Bet Pots Wrong (Here’s the Complete System) Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 22
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
oop_3betpot_pfr_default_check_heavy
Default to a LOT of checking (often the entire range). The pool over-stabs when checked to, telegraphs strength with size, and doesn't protect its check-back range — so checking harvests those mistakes and keeps you from getting lost after your own small c-bet gets floated.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero is the 3-bettor out of position, checked-to on the flop
Условие: OOP as the preflop 3-bettor in a 3-bet pot.
Обоснование автора: Betting OOP into a wide floating pool builds pots you must navigate with no information; checking induces over-stabs and telegraphs, and the pool under-double-barrels so you rarely face a second bet.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
oop_3betpot_bet_or_check_by_stab_likelihood
If likely to get stabbed (wet/dynamic + aggressive) -> CHECK the entire range. If NOT likely (static/dry, passive-ish) -> go to the SPR question (next rule).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: OOP 3-bettor deciding bet vs check on the flop (chart step 1)
Условие: First question: is the spot likely to get stabbed? = (board wet/dynamic?) + (opponent aggressive?). The more wet/dynamic the board and the more aggressive the opponent, the likelier a stab. Dynamic-vs-static matters MORE than wet-vs-dry for whether they over-stab.
Обоснование автора: A stab-prone spot is where checking extracts the most from over-stabbing/telegraphing; a stab-unlikely spot needs you to bet your own value or you leave money out.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
oop_3betpot_stab_unlikely_low_spr_bet_cpfs_thickvalue
Bet your 'can-play-for-stacks' hands (happy to stack off now) AND your thick value (bet-bet-bet and be good); CHECK everything else — thin value, showdown value, draws, air. Start with a small c-bet; low SPR lets you bet-bet-bet to stack off without needing a check-raise.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: OOP, stab-unlikely board (static/dry), SPR <= 15 (chart step 2a)
Условие: Stab-unlikely (static/dry) board and SPR <= ~15.
Обоснование автора: At low SPR you can stack off over three streets without the check-raise; check-raising thick value only maximizes fold equity you don't want.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
oop_3betpot_stab_unlikely_high_spr_bet_thickvalue_check_cpfs
Bet thick value (AK) but now CHECK your can-play-for-stacks hands to set up a big check-raise. Deep, betting CPFS gets called mainly by better; checking lets you check-raise and build the huge pot when villain has Ax/pairs.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: OOP, stab-unlikely board, SPR > 15 (deep) (chart step 2b)
Условие: Stab-unlikely board and SPR > ~15 (deep, ~4k eff / rare in 3-bet pots).
Обоснование автора: Deep, the check-raise is the only way to build a stack-off pot with the strongest hands; a lead gets folds or calls-by-better.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
oop_3betpot_facing_big_stab_response
Check-raise ONLY can-play-for-stacks hands + combo draws (low fold equity needs high hand equity); check-call thick value, thin value, and high-equity draws; CHECK-FOLD pure showdown value (a big stab lets your SDV off the hook — fold it).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: checked, villain stabs BIG (chart)
Условие: Villain stabs large (absolute size big for the game; e.g. 150 into 205 at 2/5). Big stab telegraphs strength and folds little.
Обоснование автора: Against a big (strong, under-folding) stab, raise only hands with enough raw equity when called; showdown value can't profitably continue against a range screaming strength.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
oop_3betpot_facing_small_stab_wet_board_checkraise_wide
Check-raise a LOT — CPFS, combo draws, thick value (as thin value), high- AND low-equity draws (even two overs + a gutter); check-call showdown value. Lots of fold equity here.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: checked, villain stabs SMALL on a wet/dynamic board
Условие: Small stab on a wet/dynamic board: villain's range is far too weak (not enough strong hands put in the small size on a scary board).
Обоснование автора: A small stab on a dynamic board caps villain to a weak, high-fold-equity range; aggression prints.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
pool_overstabs_flop_underbarrels_turn_checkcall_wide
You can check-call the flop stab very wide because you won't face a second barrel often; the turn is the 'truth serum' — most weak stabs shut down, so a hand that was ahead of the stab stays fine.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the reason wide flop check-calls work: the turn 'truth serum'
Условие: Pool over-stabs the flop when checked to but massively UNDER double- and triple-barrels the turn.
Обоснование автора: If villain's flop stab is wide but his turn barrel is narrow, your flop calling range realizes its equity cheaply.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
oop_3betpot_facing_small_stab_static_board_checkraise_less
Check-raise a LOT LESS than on a wet board — only CPFS + combo draws; check-call thick value and low-equity draws (good price, want to see a turn, don't raise into a range that still holds many strong hands).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: checked, villain stabs SMALL on a static/dry board
Условие: Small stab on a STATIC/DRY board: villain doesn't telegraph strength (few scary turns, no incentive to size up to protect), so a small size carries less information.
Обоснование автора: On static boards a small stab isn't a weakness tell, so wide check-raising runs into too many strong hands.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
absolute_stab_size_matters_more_in_big_pots
Lean on ABSOLUTE size over pot-relative size: the bigger the pot, the more a big-money stab (even under pot) signals real strength. 150 into 205 tells you far more than a pot-sized 25 into 25.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: reading a stab by absolute vs relative size
Условие: The pot is large in absolute money (3-bet pot). A 150-into-205 stab in a 2/5 game vs a 25-into-25 stab.
Обоснование автора: Players feel absolute dollars; a big-money bet in a big pot is rarely put in light.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
turn_after_small_flop_stab_lead_cpfs_thickvalue
With can-play-for-stacks / thick value: DONK-LEAD the turn (minimize fold equity vs a weak range that would check back its air and only pays a lead). With combo draws: check-raise instead (maximize fold equity + keep the free-card option if it goes check-check).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: check-called a SMALL flop stab, now deciding the turn (chart)
Условие: Hero check-called a small flop stab (weak, under-barreling villain range); now on the turn.
Обоснование автора: Value wants to keep a capped/weak range in by leading; draws want fold equity and the option of a free river.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
ip_3betpot_range_cbet_small
Range-c-bet the entire range, SMALL (~1/3 to 40% pot) — the size where villain fast-plays strong hands and calls with weak ones. Use a SMALLER size relative to pot than in a single-raised pot (bigger absolute pot = money scarier), or villain starts trapping.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero is the 3-bettor in position, checked-to on the flop
Условие: IP as the preflop 3-bettor.
Обоснование автора: A small range bet keeps villain fast-playing his few strong hands and calling wide; the low SPR of a 3-bet pot makes range-betting cheap and hard to exploit.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
ip_3betpot_range_cbet_even_static_dry_boards
Range-c-bet small even on static dry boards in 3-bet pots. Reasons: (1) villain has far fewer top-pair combos and more pocket pairs (foldable by the river); (2) villain puts you on AK, so you can fold out his Ax by the river; (3) low SPR makes betting into the occasional trap cheap.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: IP 3-bettor on a STATIC DRY (ace-high) board — contrast with single-raised pots
Условие: Static dry ace-high board in a 3-bet pot as the IP 3-bettor. (In a SINGLE-raised pot the same coach plays big-bet-or-check here; in a 3-bet pot he does NOT.)
Обоснование автора: The single-raised-pot check-back exception is driven by the caller's dense top-pair range and huge SPR; both reverse in a 3-bet pot, so range-betting is right even on static dry boards.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
turn_ip_ask_capped_fastplay_handclass
Uncapped + won't fast-play + BLUFF -> check back (realize + set up river). Value + villain won't fast-play -> bet BIG (put the money in for them). SDV (e.g. pocket jacks) -> check back the turn (c-bet flop, check back turn, bluff-catch river).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: IP turn after range-c-betting flop and getting called (chart)
Условие: Turn decision framework: (a) is villain capped or uncapped? (b) will he fast-play his strong hands here? (c) what is our hand class (value / bluff / showdown value)?
Обоснование автора: If villain won't build the pot with his strong hands, value must bet big itself; SDV checks to reach showdown and bluff-catch.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
turn_ip_uncapped_will_fastplay_bet_small
Bet SMALL with value: small gets weak hands to call AND lets villain check-raise his made flushes for you (win-win), and keeps drawing-dead hands in. Bluffs also bet small (villain raises his flushes, calls weak stuff you fold out on the river).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: turn where a draw completed and villain WILL fast-play (raise) his made hands
Условие: Uncapped board where villain will fast-play strong hands (e.g. flush completes, he raises flushes).
Обоснование автора: When villain will do the betting for you, a small size induces raises from value and calls from the weak hands you dominate.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
turn_ip_capped_inelastic_bet_big
Bet LARGE with value (they call big anyway). SDV checks back (favorite line: c-bet flop, check back turn, bluff-catch river). Bluffs also bet big BUT pick the biggest size that keeps a good river SPR so a big overbet stays behind.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: turn where villain is capped but inelastic (won't fold his made hands)
Условие: Villain capped (would have raised strong hands on the wet flop) but INELASTIC — his queen-x / draws call any size.
Обоснование автора: Against an inelastic capped range, size up value; bluffs size for the river you want, not just this street.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
turn_ip_capped_elastic_bet_small_drag_to_river
Bet SMALL with value (keep ace-x/pairs calling). With bluffs also bet small: drag weak hands (9x/jacks/tens) to the river for a profitable river bluff; a big turn bet only leaves king-x+ you can't fold out.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: turn where villain is capped and ELASTIC (folds to big bets)
Условие: Villain capped and ELASTIC — most of his range (queens, ace-nine) folds to a big turn bet.
Обоснование автора: Against an elastic range, a big bet folds out exactly the hands you want in; small keeps value paid and sets up the river bluff.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
turn_value_and_bluff_share_plan_diverge_river
Value and bluffs usually share the SAME turn plan (both want villain to CALL the turn) and DIVERGE on the river (value wants a river call, bluffs want a river fold). Choose the turn size that serves both.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: general principle: turn plan of value vs bluffs
Условие: Any IP turn where you hold either value or a bluff.
Обоснование автора: On the turn both classes want continuation; splitting sizings by class telegraphs. The divergence is a river decision.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
river_ip_uncapped_fastplay_value_small_bluff_medium
VALUE bets small (weak queen-x calls, flushes raise for you). BLUFF bets MEDIUM: small lets queen-x call and flushes raise; big means only flushes call; medium folds out queen-x/pairs (snapped only by the flushes) and prints.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: river, villain uncapped and WILL fast-play (raise flushes)
Условие: River where villain is uncapped and will raise his made flushes.
Обоснование автора: Value size for the raise/call from strong+weak; a bluff needs the size that folds the middle without inviting the flush raise or the wide call.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
river_ip_capped_inelastic_value_big_bluff_small
VALUE bets BIG/jam (sticky calls). BLUFF bets SMALL — a small bluff folds out ace-x/king-x of the missed suit cheaply; no need to risk more against a range that will fold to any bet.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: river, villain capped and INELASTIC (short SPR, sticky queen-x)
Условие: River where villain is capped and inelastic — his queen-x won't fold for the remaining stack.
Обоснование автора: Inelastic value wants max size; the bluff only needs to clear the foldable hands, so it risks the minimum.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
river_inelasticity_test_via_value_version
If you would NOT jam the value hand because ace-jack/ace-ten would fold, then villain is ELASTIC -> your BLUFF should go BIG (fold them all out). If the value hand would happily jam because they're sticky -> INELASTIC -> your bluff goes small. Value always bets 'the biggest size worse will call'.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: deciding bluff size by asking how big the VALUE version would bet
Условие: Deep river, villain capped; unsure if his range is inelastic. Test: 'if I held the value hand (AK), how big would I bet to get called by ace-queen/ace-jack?'
Обоснование автора: Elasticity, not board alone, sets bluff size: a range that folds your value's max bet is a range your bluff should blast; a sticky range is one your bluff should needle.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
ip_3betpot_cbet_flop_checkback_turn_bluffcatch_river
C-bet the flop, CHECK BACK the turn, then bluff-catch the river if villain chooses a small size. Explicitly the coach's 'favorite line in poker' for SDV.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the recurring favorite line for showdown-value hands IP
Условие: IP 3-bet pot with a showdown-value hand (e.g. pocket jacks/tens) after range-c-betting the flop.
Обоснование автора: SDV realizes best by controlling the pot to showdown; checking the turn caps villain's ability to over-bet you off it and sets up a cheap river bluff-catch.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
three_bet_pot_vs_srp_range_construction
In 3-bet pots, villain has FEWER top-pair combos and a range weighted to pocket pairs (foldable), puts you on AK, and the SPR is low (traps cost less to bet into) — so range-betting IP is right even where a single-raised pot wants big-bet-or-check. Do not carry SRP board-texture exceptions into 3-bet pots.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: why 3-bet pots differ from single-raised pots for c-betting
Условие: Comparing a 3-bet pot to a single-raised pot on the same board.
Обоснование автора: Range composition + SPR, not board texture alone, drive the c-bet decision, and both shift toward betting in 3-bet pots.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
Был Монархом стал Бомжом: -$12 млн в покере за 1 вечер #покер #poker #inner #avrora #triton Targeted pass Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 4
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
dont_slowplay_tptk_turn_balance_bluffs
Bet, don't trap: betting gets value from villain's bluff-catchers (9x/Tx/weak Jx) AND balances your many bluffs on the line (so villain can't call your later bluffs cheaply). Trapping TPTK unbalances you and forfeits value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: don't slow-play TPTK on the turn
Условие: Top pair top kicker on the turn on a line where you also have many bluffs.
Обоснование автора: A checked-strong range makes your bets all-bluffs; betting value keeps them credible.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
check_weak_sdv_vulnerable_to_checkraise_up_top
Check them into your range up top: c-betting A-high/weak pairs is fine at micro (few check-raises), but the higher the limit the more vulnerable they are to check-raises — check to avoid getting blown off and to protect your checking range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: check weak SDV vulnerable to check-raises
Условие: A-high / weak pairs that c-bet fine at micro but get check-raised at higher limits.
Обоснование автора: At higher limits a wide c-bet of weak hands invites check-raises you can't defend.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
top_of_capped_range_must_bluffcatch
Don't over-fold your best remaining hand: once you've checked and shown you lack the nuts, that hand is the TOP of your capped range and must bluff-catch. Over-folding the top of a capped range is exploitable — call.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the top of a capped range must bluff-catch
Условие: Your line caps you (you checked a street, admitting no nuts) and you face a river bet.
Обоснование автора: If you fold the best hand you can have, you're exploitably over-folding a capped range.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Low-limit exploit sizing & bluff-catch (Monarch streams)
-
concrete_jungleman_flat4bet_and_top_range_call
Correct: flat-4bet (not a light jam) keeps room; then calling with the top of his capped range (the Tx/AQ he checked = his best remaining hand) is right vs Monarch turning a hand into a bluff. Don't over-fold the top of a capped range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Jungleman flat-4bets and calls with the top of his range
Условие: Jungleman flat-4bets AK (not jam), later checks the turn (admits no set), then faces Monarch's river bet.
Обоснование автора: A flat 4-bet plus a range-top bluff-catch avoids both the light-jam and the over-fold leaks.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Low-limit exploit sizing & bluff-catch (Monarch streams)
Пьяный директор Покер Ок разнес топ-регов: Джанглмен пал первым. #покер #poker #inner #avrora Targeted pass Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 5
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
3bet_bluff_offrange_unknown_table
You can 3-bet-bluff a bit off-range 'by feel': the FIRST 3-bet bluff (and roughly one every ~3 orbits when you've been quiet) goes through vs a high-fold-to-3bet pool. But pick suited/connected/blocker hands, not pure trash (95o is too weak; 95s / A-high blockers are ok).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: 3-bet-bluff off-range on an unknown table
Условие: A new table where you're unknown and the pool over-folds to 3-bets (e.g. NL25 OOP folds 60-70%).
Обоснование автора: An unknown image plus a high fold-to-3bet pool makes the occasional light 3-bet print.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Low-limit exploit sizing & bluff-catch (Monarch streams)
-
barrel_cards_that_fit_your_range
A card that improves YOUR range (a K when you hold AK/KQ/KT and villain can't) is a good 2nd-barrel card — it has fold equity AND represents credible value. Don't barrel indiscriminately; barrel the cards that hit you.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: barrel scare cards that fit your range
Условие: A turn/river card that adds value combos to your line while villain is capped.
Обоснование автора: A card you rep credibly and villain can't gives both fold equity and a believable value story.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Low-limit exploit sizing & bluff-catch (Monarch streams)
-
thin_value_small_vs_ahigh_low_limits
Bet SMALL (1/3) to get called by A-high / small pairs (they call by relative hand strength). A big bet or overbet folds them out and undercollects — save overbets for strong-and-sticky ranges.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: thin value small vs A-high/weak-SDV
Условие: A strong value hand vs a range that's mostly A-high / weak showdown value at low limits.
Обоснование автора: Weak made hands pay a small bet but fold to a big one, so size down for the call.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Low-limit exploit sizing & bluff-catch (Monarch streams)
-
one_and_half_street_value_check_turn_bet_river
Check the turn and BET the river: with a 1.5-street hand the single street lands more reliably on the river (villain calls more with one bet left to showdown). Betting the turn often takes only one street and loses the river call.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: 1.5-street value: check turn, bet river
Условие: A hand worth ~1.5 streets of value; villain's line is weak (raised-then-checked, or a scare card came).
Обоснование автора: The river call is more forthcoming than a turn+river double-barrel from a 1.5-street hand.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Low-limit exploit sizing & bluff-catch (Monarch streams)
-
donk_bet_defense_vs_amateurs
Don't over-respect it — amateurs donk weak made hands and draws. Raise your strong hands and good draws (for value / to deny equity), call medium bluff-catchers, and fold the weak. Their donk range is wide and under-bluffed on later streets.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: donk-bet defense vs amateurs
Условие: Facing a donk-bet from an amateur/recreational.
Обоснование автора: A wide, weak donk range is attacked by raising value/draws and calling catchers, not by folding.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Low-limit exploit sizing & bluff-catch (Monarch streams)
Бывший лудоман обыграл Монарха в покере на $5 млн. Кайхан Мокри против Монарха. #покер #poker #inner Targeted pass Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 7
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
bet_strong_when_villain_checks_back
Bet for value yourself, don't trap. A check-back caps him to weak/medium MADE hands (people bluff simply and cheaply on earlier streets), so there are no bluffs to catch — get value now.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: bet strong hands when villain checks back
Условие: Villain checked back the flop or turn; you have a strong hand.
Обоснование автора: A checked-back range is made-but-weak and won't bluff, so trapping only forfeits value.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
bet_strong_on_boards_your_bluffs_cbet
Bet your strong hands: on such boards your check looks strong (you'd have c-bet your air), so villain won't bluff into it (no weak hands left to fold). Don't trap — bet.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: bet strong on boards where your bluffs c-bet
Условие: A texture you'd normally c-bet air on (J-5-2), and you check a strong hand.
Обоснование автора: A check on a board you'd c-bet air announces strength, killing villain's bluff incentive.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
bet_strong_on_blank_runouts
Bet: a card that doesn't frighten you won't be bluffed by villain either, so checking to induce a bluff fails. Bet your strong hands for value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: bet strong on blank runouts
Условие: A blank turn/river that doesn't scare you, holding a strong hand.
Обоснование автора: Villain bluffs scary cards, not blanks, so a blank check wins nothing extra.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
concrete_monarch_traps_set_backfires
Should have BET the turn set and the river himself (value from 5x/2x/33; cooler Mokri or lose the minimum). Trapping on a check-back board gave a free card and forfeited value; Monarch snap-called and lost.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Monarch's turn/river trap backfires
Условие: Monarch flops 99, checks; turn 9 (set) checks (trap); river completes a straight; Mokri overbets the nut straight.
Обоснование автора: Betting extracts value and denies the free straight card that the trap allowed.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
tp_no_kicker_ip_vs_passive_regs
Range-c-bet 1/3-1/2 flop (incl. TP weak kicker), then CHECK the turn, then river CALL if villain bets / BET if villain checks. It's a 1.5-street hand: the turn check earns 2 streets more often (villain calls more with one bet to showdown) and leaves him room to bluff the river.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: TP no-kicker IP vs passive regs
Условие: Top pair no/weak kicker in position vs passive micro regs (NL2-25, low check-raise, few overbets).
Обоснование автора: A 1.5-street hand realizes more value on the check-turn line vs a passive pool.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
tp_no_kicker_ip_vs_aggressive
Polarize the c-bet: bet only TP strong kicker+/semibluffs, and CHECK TP weak kicker on the flop (protects your checking range, blocks villain's thin value bets). Then bet if villain checks the turn, or call (incl. overbets) if he bets.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: TP no-kicker IP vs aggressive opponents
Условие: Top pair no/weak kicker IP vs aggressive opponents (NL100+, check-raise 15-20%, overbets).
Обоснование автора: Against high check-raise/overbet frequencies, checking TP weak kicker protects the range and avoids getting blown off.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
herocall_by_combos_vs_thin_value_line
Hero-call: when the line reps value but the value combos don't add up (few straights/sets, he'd bet those on the flop), it's a bluff. Wide fish lines with thin value make the hero-call correct.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero-call by combos vs a fishy line
Условие: A value-line raise (check-call, underbet, then x3 raise) that doesn't add up combinatorically.
Обоснование автора: If the represented value can't be there combinatorically, the aggression is a bluff.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Low-limit exploit sizing & bluff-catch (Monarch streams)
Самый дорогой матч в истории покера. Монарх и 2 миллиарда рублей на кону. #покер #poker #avrora Targeted pass Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 5
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
semibluff_two_variables_equity_and_fe
Weigh two variables: EQUITY (outs — 8/9/12/15 is high) and FOLD EQUITY (how often villain folds). Bet unmade hands with high outs OR high fold equity; check when both are low.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: semibluff decision = equity + fold equity
Условие: Deciding whether to bet an unmade hand (c-bet / stab).
Обоснование автора: Either enough equity or enough folds makes the bet +EV; neither makes it a check.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Low-limit exploit sizing & bluff-catch (Monarch streams)
-
ip_small_range_bet_after_calling_checkraise
Bet SMALL (~1/3) with your WHOLE range (2pair+, medium top/2nd pairs, and draws): his check-raise-then-check is capped/polar (he gave up), so a small range-bet extracts thin value and protects. Simplify — don't fear a second check-raise.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: IP small range-bet after calling a check-raise
Условие: You called a flop check-raise IP and villain checks the turn.
Обоснование автора: A check-raise that checks the turn is capped, so a cheap range-bet prints across your range.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Low-limit exploit sizing & bluff-catch (Monarch streams)
-
polar_flop_cbet_to_avoid_getting_stuck
Check underpairs/weak top pairs/2nd pairs on dry boards (so you can't be check-raised off them and aren't stuck), and c-bet a POLAR range (strong hands + semibluffs). This avoids the spots where Osikitola got stuck.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: polar flop c-bet to avoid getting stuck
Условие: As the aggressor on a dry board with underpairs/weak top pairs.
Обоснование автора: Checking marginal hands keeps them out of raise-or-fold spots and protects the checking range.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
doezds_low_limits_two_approaches
Two valid approaches: BALANCED (check trips to protect your capped weak range, let villain bluff/bet worse) OR EXPLOITATIVE (bet — low-limit regs under-bluff, so you must bet to extract). Prefer exploitative vs under-bluffing pools.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: trips/doezds at low limits: two approaches
Условие: You improve to trips/a strong hand OOP at low limits.
Обоснование автора: Balance only pays vs opponents who bluff your checks; low-limit pools don't, so bet.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
herocall_vs_capped_overbluffer
Call: his strong value would've played differently (c-bet the flop), so his value on this line is limited, and if he bluffs even a 4 he has many worse bluffs too. A capped, over-bluffing line -> bluff-catch.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero-call vs a capped over-bluffer
Условие: Villain turns even a tiny pair (a 4) into a bluff-raise on a line where his value is thin.
Обоснование автора: Thin value plus abundant bluffs on a capped line makes the call +EV.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Low-limit exploit sizing & bluff-catch (Monarch streams)
Покер-про раздел финского Монарха до трусов в покере. Часть 2 #покер #poker #обучение #avrora #inner Targeted pass Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 6
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
checkraise_is_polar
Check-raise a POLAR range: strong value (2pair+) plus weak bluffs (backdoor equity). Check-raise hands you'd happily play for stacks on the flop (if he 3-bets/jams your raise, you snap-call) — not medium hands.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: check-raises are polar
Условие: Choosing a flop check-raise as the preflop caller OOP.
Обоснование автора: A check-raise commits to a big pot, so it wants nuts-or-air, not medium made hands.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
value_checkraise_needs_two_pair_plus_oop
Use only 2pair+/sets/straights, NOT top pairs/2nd pairs. As the caller you're capped (no AA/KK/QQ/AK — they 3-bet pre), while the PFR holds all the top pairs/overpairs, so a top-pair check-raise is dominated. Lower the bar (TPGK) only vs short stacks / loose openers.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: value check-raise needs 2pair+ OOP
Условие: Value check-raising as the preflop caller OOP.
Обоснование автора: A capped OOP value range means only 2pair+ is genuinely ahead of the PFR's continuing range.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
bluff_checkraise_backdoor_and_weak_thirds
Bluff-check-raise unmade hands with backdoor equity (BDFD + backdoor straight draw) and weak vulnerable 3rd pairs (with overcards). They fold out better, pressure medium hands, and can barrel the turn when the backdoor completes.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: bluff check-raise: backdoors + weak 3rd pairs
Условие: Building the bluff side of your check-raise range.
Обоснование автора: Backdoor equity gives turns to barrel, so these bluffs have outs and fold equity.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
checkraise_golden_rule_top_fold_bottom_call
Check-raise the TOP of your FOLDING range / BOTTOM of your CALLING range (hands you'd reluctantly fold or barely call one street). Hands you comfortably call 1-2 streets (top pairs, 2nd pairs, A-high with good outs) -> check-CALL, not check-raise.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: golden rule of check-raise selection
Условие: Deciding whether a hand check-raises or check-calls.
Обоснование автора: Comfortable calls realize more by calling; only the marginal fold/call hands make good bluff-raises.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
dont_checkraise_showdown_value_redraws
Check-CALL, don't check-raise: raising A-high-with-SDV-and-outs only folds out worse and burns the showdown/bluff-catch value. It's a comfortable call, not a raise.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: don't check-raise showdown value / redraws
Условие: A-high with good outs / showdown value on the flop.
Обоснование автора: Raising a hand that beats worse and folds them out is strictly worse than calling.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
concrete_osikitola_a4s_checkraise_minus_ev
Should check-CALL: A-high with showdown value + outs only folds out worse if raised. A -EV check-raise (he won by rivering two pair, but that doesn't validate it).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: A4s check-raise on K-5-2 is -EV
Условие: Osikitola check-raises A4s (A-high + BDFD + gutshot + SDV) on K-5-2.
Обоснование автора: Result-oriented luck doesn't make a check-raise of a comfortable call correct.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
Сначала ты, потом тебя. Привыкай Монарх – это покер! Часть 1. #покер #poker #обучение #avrora #inner Targeted pass Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 5
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
dont_slowplay_strong_hands_low_limits
Bet big on the flop and turn. Three reasons not to trap: (1) low-limit opponents make more CALLING mistakes than bluffing mistakes (they call gutshots/2nd pairs but rarely bluff your check), so trapping under-extracts; (2) you can fall in love / misplay; (3) a check-only-strong range unbalances you (your bets become all bluffs, giving villain better odds to call your later bluffs).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: don't slow-play strong hands at low limits
Условие: A strong made hand (two pair/set/straight/strong top pair) at low limits.
Обоснование автора: Stations pay bets far more than they bluff checks, so betting extracts and keeps your range balanced.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
almost_always_checkraise_sets_low_limits
Almost NEVER check-call — almost always check-RAISE. If you don't raise you don't extract from worse (low-limit opponents call more than they bluff), and check-calling forfeits a street of value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: almost always check-raise sets at low limits
Условие: You flop a set/two pair/straight as the preflop caller OOP at low limits.
Обоснование автора: A calling-mistake-prone pool pays check-raises; check-calling wins less.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Fast-play & check-raise selection at low limits (Monarch streams)
-
overbet_cbet_air_on_advantaged_textures
You can overbet-c-bet even with air/K-high on some textures: with range and nut advantage the overbet pressures the caller's capped range. A GTO tool, not just a value size.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: overbet-c-bet air on range-advantaged textures
Условие: PFR on a texture where you hold a range/nut advantage (e.g. 10-8-5).
Обоснование автора: Range/nut advantage lets the overbet fold out the caller's capped range cheaply.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Low-limit exploit sizing & bluff-catch (Monarch streams)
-
small_bet_range_after_checkraise_then_check
Bet SMALL with your whole range: his check-raise-then-check line shows he gave up / is capped, so a small bet extracts thin value, balances your range, and lets you cheaply barrel.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: small-bet your range after check-raise-then-check
Условие: Villain check-raises the flop then checks the turn.
Обоснование автора: A check-raise that gives up on the turn is capped, so a cheap range-bet prints.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Low-limit exploit sizing & bluff-catch (Monarch streams)
-
edge_vs_competent_rec_is_small
The pro's edge over a competent rec is smaller than it looks (~55-60%), and matches often resolve on a default cooler/coinflip. Don't over-read variance as skill or rigging.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the edge over a competent rec is small
Условие: Assessing win rate vs a competent recreational in a HU match.
Обоснование автора: A modest edge means single hands and coinflips swing results heavily.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
Боль! Витя Малиновский наказал себя сам за слоу-плей в покере. #покер #poker #avrora #обучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 10
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
fast_play_when_villain_has_many_worse_strong_hands
Raise (fast-play) when villain holds many strong hands that pay — TPTK, overpairs (e.g. on J-10-5 he has KK/QQ/AA/AJ/KJ). They call a raise, so get value now.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: fast-play criterion 1: villain has worse strong hands
Условие: You flop a strong hand (two pair/set/straight) and the texture gives villain many worse-but-strong hands.
Обоснование автора: A texture full of strong second-best hands maximizes the value a raise collects.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
fast_play_when_villain_has_many_draws
Raise: draws pay a raise, and if they fold you steal their equity share — either way a win. J-10-5 (KQ OESD, 89, AQ gutshot) is draw-heavy -> raise.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: fast-play criterion 2: villain has many draws
Условие: A draw-heavy texture where villain has FDs, combo draws, gutshot-makers.
Обоснование автора: Draws either pay or fold their equity to you; both beat slow-playing.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
fast_play_when_hand_is_vulnerable
The more VULNERABLE your hand, the more you raise: two pair/set/straight lose to completed draws, bigger two pair, or sets. (An invulnerable full house like KK5 on K-5-5 can slow-play.)
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: fast-play criterion 3: your hand is vulnerable
Условие: Your strong hand can be outdrawn (gutshots/OESDs complete, board pairs).
Обоснование автора: Vulnerability means giving free cards is costly, so charge and protect now.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
fast_play_when_board_can_get_scary_kills_value
Raise NOW while villain will pay: if a scare card comes he won't pay your strong hand anymore — the hands that would call a flop raise won't pay a turn/river barrel. It's about lost VALUE, not just being outdrawn.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: fast-play criterion 4: scary cards kill your value
Условие: The board can run out scary (ace, flush, readable straight).
Обоснование автора: Value evaporates on scary runouts, so collect it on the flop.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
fast_play_vs_passive_non_bluffer
Fast-play for value: slow-playing only pays off if he bluffs later streets, so vs a non-bluffer there are no extra bluff chips to collect — raise now.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: fast-play criterion 5: villain rarely bluffs
Условие: Villain is accurate/passive and rarely bluffs.
Обоснование автора: No future bluffs to induce means slow-playing only forfeits value.
Review: Не проверено
-
fast_play_if_you_cant_find_folds
If you can't find a fold when the board gets scary (fall in love with two pair/set after a flush/straight completes), that's a reason to raise now rather than slow-play into an impossible spot.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: fast-play if you can't fold
Условие: You tend to fall in love with strong hands / misread scary boards.
Обоснование автора: Fast-playing avoids the tough later-street fold you won't make correctly.
Review: Не проверено
-
when_slowplay_is_ok
Slow-play only when your hand is near-invulnerable (e.g. flopped full house), the board can't hurt you, and villain will keep barreling/bluffing so you collect more by trapping.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: when slow-play is fine
Условие: A very strong, invulnerable hand vs a bluffy opponent on a dry board.
Обоснование автора: Trapping wins extra only when nothing can go wrong and villain keeps betting.
Review: needs_context
-
gear_change_breaks_reads
Beware gear changes: even a 'careful' player can switch to hyper-bluffy for a session and bet way beyond his range. Update the read from THIS session, not his baseline.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: watch for gear changes
Условие: An accurate/passive opponent suddenly starts spewing that session.
Обоснование автора: A mid-session style switch invalidates the baseline read and can trap you into a bad fold.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Gear changes & off-range reads
-
concrete_malinovsky_should_raise_flop
Raise the flop: many worse strong hands (KK/AJ/KJ), many draws (KQ/89/AQ), and a vulnerable hand on a board that can get scary. Slow-playing led to a K-then-7 runout and a pot-bet river he had to fold to.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Malinovsky should raise the flop
Условие: JTo top two pair on J-10-5 rainbow; Dini c-bets; Malinovsky calls (slow-plays).
Обоснование автора: All four fast-play criteria are met, so flatting forfeits value and creates a brutal river.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
concrete_dini_pure_bluff_offrange
Malinovsky's fold is fine given no read, but note the gear change: Dini had switched to hyper-bluffy that session (earlier 3bet-squeeze K9 c-bet overbet-jam with 66). An attentive read could have found the call.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Dini's river is an off-range bluff
Условие: River 7; Dini pot-bets 84k and shows 33 (a pure bluff, far beyond his careful range).
Обоснование автора: The pot-bet is polar and value-heavy by default; only the session gear-change made it a bluff.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Gear changes & off-range reads
Монарх побил свой рекорд в покере. Крупнейший банк в истории покера. #покер #poker #avrora #обучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 5
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
three_factor_order_value_first
Weigh in order: (1) villain's VALUE quantity (most important), (2) range WIDTH (wider -> more absolute bluffs), (3) opponent type (last). People wrongly lead with 'he's aggressive'; value quantity comes first.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the three-factor order (value first)
Условие: A borderline river call/fold vs a big bet.
Обоснование автора: Value quantity dominates; opponent aggression is only the tiebreaker.
Review: Не проверено
-
check_flop_line_caps_away_from_value
A check-flop line usually CAPS him away from value (sets/2pair/TP/overpairs c-bet a wet board), so the raw combo count says few value hands -> leans call. But don't stop at the count.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: a flop check caps away from value
Условие: Villain checked the flop then bets big later.
Обоснование автора: Checking strong hands is rare, so the arriving value looks thin by combos alone.
Review: Не проверено
-
simpler_line_question_decisive
Ask: could he bluff with a SIMPLER, cheaper line? A 5x overbet-jam after a check-call is never a bluff — bluffs take cheaper routes (c-bet flop, raise turn, small river raise). Weird + expensive = a trapped monster -> FOLD, even if the combo count looked thin.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the decisive simpler-line question
Условие: Facing a weird, expensive river line (check-call then 5x overbet-jam).
Обоснование автора: Bluffs migrate to the cheapest credible line, so a costly convoluted jam is value.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_foxen_flush_call_vs_monarch_boat
Fold: the combo count said 'little value' (the flop check caps Monarch), but the simpler-line question says fold — a 5x jam is never a bluff. Foxen called and lost $11M.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Foxen calls the overbet-jam and loses
Условие: Foxen's flush vs Monarch's check-flop, call-turn, 5x-overbet-jam river (KJ two pair -> KKJ boat).
Обоснование автора: The count overstated his bluffs; the line's cost and shape reveal the trap.
Review: Не проверено
-
note_flop_check_two_pair_theoretically_bad
Theoretically bad to check: c-bet for value, get called by worse, and deny cheap draws. Monarch's flop check trapped here but is -EV over distance; don't slow-play two pair on wet boards.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: note: checking two pair on a wet board is -EV
Условие: Two pair on a wet, draw-heavy flop.
Обоснование автора: Slow-playing a vulnerable two pair gives free draws and forfeits value.
Review: Не проверено
Монарх обнулил Покер Про. Крупнейший банк в истории покера. #покер #poker #avrora #обучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 7
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
four_bluff_4bet_approaches
Pick the approach by his 3-bet type: LEVERAGE (polar 3bets), SEMI-BLOCKERS (linear 3bets), GTO/MIXED (balanced), NO-BLUFF (nit). Read fold-to-4bet and call-4bet frequencies to choose.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: four bluff-4bet approaches by 3-bet type
Условие: Deciding how to 4-bet vs a 3-bettor.
Обоснование автора: The right hands and size depend entirely on how (and how much) villain 3-bets.
Review: Не проверено
-
leverage_principle_vs_polar_3bets
Bluff-4bet BLOCKER hands (AT/KT/KJ/QJ block AK/AA/AQ/JJ/QQ) with a SMALL size (~2x the 3-bet + 1bb; a 10bb 3bet -> ~20-21bb). He jams-or-folds and rarely calls, so blockers matter and a small size avoids over-investing (extra 3bb x100 = 300bb/100).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: leverage: vs polar 3-bettors
Условие: vs a polar 3-bettor (strong + weak, high fold-to-4bet, 3bet 10-15%).
Обоснование автора: Against a jam-or-fold range, blockers raise fold equity and a small size limits the cost.
Review: Не проверено
-
semi_blocker_principle_vs_linear_3bets
Bluff-4bet SEMI-BLOCKERS — suited playable partial-blockers (K7s/Q9s/A2s/A4s) with a BIGGER size (23-27bb). They call, so pick hands that flop well (flushes/pairs) and size big to deny equity / force tough OOP calls.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: semi-blockers: vs linear 3-bettors
Условие: vs a linear/depolarized 3-bettor (best hands, low fold-to-4bet <50%, they call 4-bets).
Обоснование автора: A calling opponent needs playable 4-bet hands and a size that punishes his flats.
Review: Не проверено
-
gto_mixed_bigger_3bet_more_strong_4bets
Use a MIXED range (blockers + semi-blockers). Key: the BIGGER his 3-bet, the more STRONG hands you also 4-bet (KQ/AJ you'd flat vs 10bb -> 4-bet vs 13bb) — a bigger 3-bet gives worse pot odds and harder equity realization, so 4-bet rather than flat.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: GTO/mixed: bigger 3bet -> more strong 4bets
Условие: vs a balanced 3-bettor with elevated sizing (11-13bb).
Обоснование автора: Worse odds/realization against a large 3-bet make 4-betting better than flatting.
Review: Не проверено
-
no_bluff_4bet_vs_nits
4-bet ONLY for value (JJ+/AK). If they 3-bet without bluffs, you 4-bet without bluffs. Rarely add an ATo-type 4bet-fold if you must.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: no-bluff 4bet vs nits
Условие: vs a nit/fish who 3-bets very narrow (5-7%, no bluffs).
Обоснование автора: A bluffless 3-bet range gives your bluff-4bets no fold equity, so bet only value.
Review: Не проверено
-
check_capped_range_after_flatting_4bet_oop
Check the flop: flatting a 4-bet caps your range (few strong hands — premiums give action preflop), so a standard 4bp-OOP check-and-decide is correct.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: check after flatting a 4-bet OOP
Условие: You flat-called a 4-bet out of position.
Обоснование автора: A capped OOP range has little to bet, so checking is the default.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_jungleman_A8_bluff_4bet_then_fold
Textbook: the A8 bluff-4bet uses ace blockers to cut Monarch's premium combos; then Jungleman HERO-FOLDS the rivered top pair to the jam (not enough bluffs). A good 4bet-bluff-then-fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Jungleman A8 bluff-4bet then hero-folds
Условие: Jungleman A8o bluff-4bets (blocks AK/AA/AQ/AJ) vs Monarch's AJs 3-bet; both check flop; river A gives Jungleman top pair; Monarch (two pair) jams.
Обоснование автора: Ace blockers make the 4-bet-bluff work; the river jam is value-heavy so the top pair folds.
Review: Не проверено
Блеф ценой в Феррари разбился о натсы в покере! 3бет поты 3 ставки в блеф #покер #poker #обучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 5
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
three_factors_for_triple_barrel_bluff
Fire three barrels only when ALL three hold: (1) a suitable opponent who folds enough; (2) your hand BLOCKS his strong call-down combos; (3) your hand does NOT block his auto-fold busted draws.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: three factors for a triple-barrel bluff in a 3bp
Условие: Deciding whether to bluff three barrels with air in a 3-bet pot.
Обоснование автора: Missing any factor collapses fold equity, turning the bluff into a punt.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Triple-barrel bluffing in 3-bet pots (three factors)
-
factor1_suitable_opponent_folds_enough
Pick a reg (100bb, auto-rebuy) who under-credits your bluffs: at low limits regs under-bluff flop-turn-river, so they credit you with TT-AA and fold 88/99. Fold-to-3rd-barrel ~56% > required ~40% at pot -> +EV. Don't do it vs a fish who won't fold 2nd/3rd pair.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 1: suitable opponent
Условие: Choosing whom to triple-barrel bluff.
Обоснование автора: The bluff only prints against a range that actually folds enough.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Triple-barrel bluffing in 3-bet pots (three factors)
-
factor2_block_strong_calldowns
Your hand should BLOCK the strong hands he'd call three barrels with. On 7-7-2, QJ is ideal (blocks QQ/JJ that cold-called the 3-bet and would call down); AK on J-8-2 blocks AJ/KJ. Blocks -> plus; doesn't block -> minus.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 2: block his strong call-downs
Условие: Selecting the bluffing hand for three barrels.
Обоснование автора: Removing his strong calling combos raises the chance he folds.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Triple-barrel bluffing in 3-bet pots (three factors)
-
factor3_dont_block_autofold_draws
Your hand should NOT block his busted draws (hands he calls flop/turn but auto-folds the river). A hand off the flush suit is good (leaves his diamond FDs live to fold out); an unmade hand that doesn't block his other draws is a great bluff.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 3: don't block his auto-fold draws
Условие: Selecting the bluffing hand for three barrels.
Обоснование автора: Keeping his busted draws in range maximizes the hands that fold to the river barrel.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Triple-barrel bluffing in 3-bet pots (three factors)
-
concrete_malinovsky_KJ_barrels_into_boat
A punt: factor 1 failed — Andy slow-played trips-to-a-boat and never folds, so no fold equity. The three factors would have said slow down (the opponent won't fold), not газовать. Bluffed $350k into the nuts.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Malinovsky triple-barrels KJs into a boat
Условие: Malinovsky 3-bets KJs SB, Andy calls 76s; flop 7-7-2 (Andy trips), turn 6 (Andy boat); Malinovsky barrels flop/turn/river.
Обоснование автора: Against a trapping range with no folds, all three barrels are pure -EV.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Triple-barrel bluffing in 3-bet pots (three factors)
Самый дорогой блеф в истории покера. Counter Strike VS Poker Pro. #покер #poker #avrora #обучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
identify_finished_bluff_line_players
Offline: they think 'if I bluff, I bluff to the end' (bet flop-turn-river). Online via stats: aggression spread across streets with no >10% drop-off (45/38/34), high per-action continuation (c-bet->barrel, check-raise->barrel, stab->barrel), high WWSF, low WSD (<50%).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: identify finished-bluff-line players
Условие: Reading whether an opponent barrels bluffs to the river.
Обоснование автора: Knowing they finish bluffs is the premise for the whole counter-strategy.
Review: Не проверено
-
gross_error_call_then_fold_later
The gross error is calling the flop then folding the turn (or calling flop+turn then folding the river). Against a finisher that just burns money on the most expensive streets.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: don't call then fold later
Условие: Facing a finisher's barrels with a marginal hand.
Обоснование автора: Paying early to fold late pays maximum into the very bluffs you knew were coming.
Review: Не проверено
-
decide_on_flop_hold_all_three_or_fold
Decide on the flop whether the hand can hold flop-turn-river. If yes, call down to the end (close eyes, even on scary cards). If no, fold on the flop.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: decide on the flop: hold three streets or fold
Условие: Holding a made hand vs a finisher.
Обоснование автора: A finisher barrels every street, so a hand that can't go the distance must fold now.
Review: Не проверено
-
pick_bluffcatchers_to_call_down
Call down with high 2nd pairs (KT/AT/JT on Q-T-x) and top pairs (medium/weak kicker) — these are the bluff-catchers. Check-call them to the end.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: pick the right call-down hands
Условие: Choosing which hands to check-call to the end.
Обоснование автора: Genuine bluff-catchers beat the finisher's air across all three streets.
Review: Не проверено
-
fold_or_checkraise_unsuitable_hands
Check-FOLD them on the flop (they can't hold three streets, even vs a bluffer). Exception: turn some into bluffs via check-raise (3rd pair + backdoor FD, weak 2nd pair + BDFD) rather than float-and-fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: don't call down unsuitable hands
Условие: Weak Ax, small pockets, 3rd pair, weak 2nd pair vs a finisher.
Обоснование автора: A hand you'll fold by the river burns money as a float; fold now or make it a bluff.
Review: Не проверено
-
fast_play_strong_hands_vs_finishers
Don't slow-play — play FAST (raise/bet/jam): they have value hands to build a big pot AND they float or 3-bet your bluff-raises (they can't fold, they spew), so fast-play prints.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: fast-play strong hands vs finishers
Условие: Holding a set/two pair/straight/flush vs a finisher.
Обоснование автора: A spewy aggressor pays fast-played value and attacks your checks, so trapping forfeits value.
Review: Не проверено
-
general_framework_vs_finishers
Fast-play strong hands; check-call bluff-catchers (top/high 2nd pairs) to the end; fold or check-raise-bluff weak hands whose equity gets burned. Simple and consistent.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the simple framework vs finishers
Условие: General approach vs a finished-bluff-line opponent.
Обоснование автора: Three buckets — value/catcher/junk — cover every hand vs a finisher.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_monarch_weak_ace_conflict
A genuine conflict: aggressive villain -> call, but MANY stronger combos (KJ/AT/AQ/QT/TT). ~31% equity = a marginal call that flips -EV if he under-bluffs. On such a wet board (any diamond/K/J worsens it) the clean plays are close-eyes-call-down OR fold ON THE FLOP; the river fold (the middle path) cost the most.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Monarch's weak ace on A-Q-T
Условие: Monarch weak Ax (top pair weak kicker) on A-Q-T+FD vs Jungleman; check-calls flop/turn, faces a river jam.
Обоснование автора: A weak Ax on a strong-favoring wet board is either a full call-down or a flop fold, never a late fold.
Review: Не проверено
Позвал в свое казино и обыграл Алексея Аврору без шансов в покер. Топ-4 банка #покер #poker #avrora Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 6
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
squeeze_width_by_fold_to_3bet
Narrow OOP vs sticky opponents (don't squeeze borderline QTs/KJo when they rarely fold to 3-bets — you play a mediocre hand OOP and can't steer the pot). Widen and iso-3bet IN POSITION vs a wide caller (QTs/KTo become good).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: 3-bet-squeeze width by opponent
Условие: Choosing which hands to 3-bet-squeeze.
Обоснование автора: Squeeze width tracks fold-to-3bet and position, not the hand alone.
Review: Не проверено
-
3bp_cbet_borderline_bet_big_once
Strategy A: bet BIG once to maximize fold equity (fold out Qx/Kx/some Ax equal-or-slightly-stronger), then give up. A single large c-bet that then checks/folds is a fine line.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: 3bp c-bet borderline hands: bet big once
Условие: A borderline hand (one/two overcards) as the 3-bettor on the flop.
Обоснование автора: A big one-and-done bet folds out marginal made hands cheaply without over-committing.
Review: Не проверено
-
3bp_cbet_borderline_triple_barrel_blockers
Strategy B: triple-barrel — bet 1/3 flop, barrel turn/river. Best with blocker hands (QJ blocks QQ/JJ that call three barrels), especially 100bb where villain over-folds by the river.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: 3bp c-bet borderline hands: triple-barrel with blockers
Условие: A borderline hand that blocks villain's call-downs (QJ on 6-6-3).
Обоснование автора: Blocking his call-downs lets a small-then-barrel line fold him off by the river.
Review: Не проверено
-
fold_equity_shifts_across_streets
Little fold equity NOW (small c-bet / sticky fish) -> MORE fold equity LATER (he drags weak hands then folds a big river). Many folds now (big c-bet) -> LESS fold equity later (only strong hands continued). Build barreling ranges around this.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: fold equity shifts across streets
Условие: Building a multi-street bluffing range.
Обоснование автора: Where the folds happen determines which streets your bluffs actually profit.
Review: Не проверено
-
ak_no_hit_2nd_barrel_blockers
A 2nd barrel is good: AK blocks AJ/KJ (his strong Jx), folds out small pairs (22-66), and can get called by worse (flush draws / weak Jx that check-back). Give up the river and win with ace-high if checked to.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: 2nd-barrel AK no-hit with blockers
Условие: AK that missed, on a turn that pairs a card (J-7-5-7) vs a fish.
Обоснование автора: Blocking his value + folding small pairs + occasional calls from worse makes the barrel +EV.
Review: Не проверено
-
recreational_spew_not_cheating
Don't read it as cheating/super-users: he's just playing recklessly (micro-stakes money for him). Super-user myths come from low-limit spew + variance. Read it as range departure, not rigging.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: reckless recreationals aren't cheating
Условие: A recreational makes wild plays that keep hitting.
Обоснование автора: Variance plus reckless play looks like foreknowledge but isn't.
Review: Не проверено
Грязь! Алексея Аврору обнулили в приватной игре на Кипре в покер. Овербеты и донкбеты. #покер #poker Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 11
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
overbet_definition
An overbet is a bet 1.5-2x the pot; it's standard above NL100 (solvers/GTO Wizard) and still rare at lower limits.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: what an overbet is
Условие: Considering a bet larger than the pot.
Обоснование автора: Overbets are a mainstream sizing tool, not a gimmick, at mid+ stakes.
Review: Не проверено
-
when_to_overbet_turn_river_can_ruin_board
Overbet the turn to extract max NOW: worse hands (2nd pairs, weak pairs) won't pay a 3rd barrel once a flush/straight completes, so charge them the most while they can still call.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: overbet turns where the river can ruin the board
Условие: Turn on a texture where the river can complete flushes/straights.
Обоснование автора: A scary river kills your value from worse pairs, so front-load it on the turn.
Review: Не проверено
-
overbet_value_range_turn
Include hands good enough to value-bet: TPTK/top-kicker, overpairs, two pair, sets (incl. middle/low sets). They get big calls from worse pairs and pair+draw combos.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the value part of a turn overbet
Условие: Building the value side of a turn overbet.
Обоснование автора: Only hands that beat the calling range and want a big call belong in the value overbet.
Review: Не проверено
-
overbet_semibluff_range_turn
Add draws with equity: OESD, gutshot+overcards, some flush draws, 3rd pairs. The overbet folds out better hands (2nd/3rd pairs, even top pair OOP at low limits) and denies/steals their draw equity (a smaller draw can't call by pot odds).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the semi-bluff part of a turn overbet
Условие: Building the bluff side of a turn overbet.
Обоснование автора: Large sizing maximizes fold equity and makes opponents' draws fold at bad odds.
Review: Не проверено
-
river_logic_after_turn_overbet
If a flush/straight completes, often CHECK BEHIND — worse no longer pays and your overbet range holds few nutted flushes. On a blank, value-bet with varied sizing. The turn overbet already generated fold equity, so villain's river range is narrow and strong.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: river after a turn overbet
Условие: You overbet the turn; a card runs out and villain (OOP) checks.
Обоснование автора: A completed draw beats your capped-flush overbet range; a blank leaves you free to value-bet.
Review: Не проверено
-
donk_bet_definition
A donk-bet = betting out of turn instead of checking to the aggressor. It's seen as fishy, but in some spots it has higher EV than checking.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: what a donk-bet is
Условие: You are the preflop caller OOP facing the aggressor postflop.
Обоснование автора: The default check isn't always best; donking can capture value checking forfeits.
Review: Не проверено
-
donk_when_caller_has_nut_advantage
Donk-bet when you have a NUT ADVANTAGE on that card — e.g. you check-called K-Q-x and the turn J gives your check-call range all the Jx (trips) that the PFR lacks.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: donk on your nut-advantage cards
Условие: A runout card gives you (the caller) more super-strong combos than the PFR.
Обоснование автора: When the card makes you the nut-advantaged range, leading extracts value the PFR can't.
Review: Не проверено
-
donk_when_opponent_has_few_bluffs
Donk-bet: if checking would just give a free check-back (he doesn't bluff that card or isn't a bluffer), leading captures value the check forfeits.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: donk when villain won't bet for you
Условие: A strong card arrives but the opponent has few bluffs / won't bet a strong card if checked to.
Обоснование автора: Against a non-bluffing range, checking your strong hand wins nothing extra.
Review: Не проверено
-
donk_decision_question_fewer_mistakes
Ask: 'if I check, will villain play with FEWER mistakes than if I bet?' If checking lets him play more accurately (check back a card that smashed your range), then checking is bad — donk to force errors / capture value. Seek spots where opponents err more.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the donk-vs-check decision question
Условие: Deciding whether to donk or check a made hand OOP.
Обоснование автора: EV comes from maximizing opponents' mistakes, not from following the default check.
Review: Не проверено
-
donk_bets_are_a_rare_line
Donk-bets are a RARE line — usually check (check-call or check-raise). But don't be afraid to 'play like a fish' and donk when it's genuinely +EV.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: donk-bets are rare
Условие: Choosing your default line as the preflop caller OOP.
Обоснование автора: Checking is right most of the time; donking is a targeted exception, not a habit.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_aurora_overbet_robert_should_donk_river
Robert should DONK the river: Aurora's turn-overbet range has almost no flushes/straights (nutted flushes prefer calls, not overbets) and this river smashed Robert's calling range (Qx+FD, pair+FD). The trap-check let Aurora check behind his beaten set — a value leak. Aurora's turn overbet was perfect; just an unlucky river.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Aurora overbets, Robert should donk river
Условие: Aurora TT (set) overbets turn on Q-10-2+FD; river completes flush AND straight; Robert (Q8 -> two pair then flush/straight) checks.
Обоснование автора: A check forfeits value against a capped overbet range that will check back.
Review: Не проверено
Бум поты в покере - коварная лудка или золотое дно? Топ-3 приема игры. #покер #poker #обучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 14
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
what_bomb_pots_are_and_why_play
In a bomb pot everyone antes blind pre and opens the flop with 100% ranges into a huge pot. Downsides: more rake, higher variance, hard to read, must play without a hand. Upside: full of fish (higher EV) and regs err (too card-dependent -> foldable; overvalue top pairs/overpairs 8-9-way).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: bomb pots overview
Условие: Deciding whether/how to play bomb pots.
Обоснование автора: The pool of recreationals and over-foldy/over-committing regs makes bomb pots +EV despite the downsides.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Bomb-pot strategy framework
-
strategy_constructor_three_axes
Split every spot by 3 axes: (1) action before you — all checked vs a bet was made; (2) position — early (SB/BB/UTG/UTG+1) vs late (MP/MP+1/CO/BTN); (3) hand category — polar / linear / trash.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the strategy constructor
Условие: Classifying any bomb-pot spot before acting.
Обоснование автора: A fixed 3-axis grid replaces guesswork in unreadable 100%-range pots.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Bomb-pot strategy framework
-
three_hand_categories_defined
POLAR = strong (TPTK, overpair, two pair, sets, straights) + very weak unmade (gutshot, BDFD+backdoor, A-high, 3rd pair, 2nd pair weak kicker). LINEAR = medium (TP weak kicker, 2nd pair good kicker, good draws: OESD/FD/combo). TRASH = check-fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the three hand categories
Условие: Categorizing your hand in a bomb pot.
Обоснование автора: Polar plays big/aggressive, linear plays calm, trash folds — the category drives the line.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Bomb-pot strategy framework
-
all_checked_early_position_min_bet
Check or min-bet (1/8-1/4 pot) with polar+linear, check trash. On passive fields where you're rarely raised, always min-bet (drop checking). Exception: strong hand + many fish + wet board -> bet big.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: all checked, early position
Условие: All checked to you; you're in early position (SB-UTG+1).
Обоснование автора: Cheap bets pressure a field that mostly missed, at low risk on passive tables.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Bomb-pot strategy framework
-
all_checked_late_position_bet_by_hand
Bet by hand: LINEAR vary size (TP ~1/3, 2nd pair/draw ~1/4); POLAR very variable — strong + many fish -> bet big (3/4) with no balancing; weak -> small (1/8-1/4).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: all checked, late position
Условие: All checked to you; you're in late position (MP-BTN).
Обоснование автора: Late position lets you size precisely by hand since fewer players remain behind.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Bomb-pot strategy framework
-
simplify_sizing_scale_to_pot
Min-bet (1/10-1/3 pot), scaled to the bomb-pot size (bigger pot -> relatively smaller bet); you can even flat-pick 1/4 pot always at low limits.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: simplifying sizings
Условие: You want a simple default when no bets have been made.
Обоснование автора: A simple scaled min-bet captures most of the EV without over-thinking sizing.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Bomb-pot strategy framework
-
facing_a_raise_of_your_bet
Bomb-pot raises look strong (people under-bluff). vs a short stack -> stack off TP medium kicker / good draws (pot odds). vs a full-stack big raise -> stack off only 2pair+/combo draws. Bigger raise -> call less (fold-or-shove). Weigh the raiser (passive never bluff -> fold medium). Bluff-catchers = top pairs + best 2nd pairs + good draws.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: facing a raise of your bet
Условие: You bet and got raised.
Обоснование автора: Since raises are value-heavy, continue only by stack depth, raise size and the raiser's tendencies.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Bomb-pot strategy framework
-
facing_a_bet_early_position
Big bet -> fold weak, raise sets/2pair, mostly just CALL medium (TP, good draws). Small bet -> call wide everything playable (incl. sets/2pair on dry boards), don't raise — let opponents keep playing behind you.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: facing a bet in early position
Условие: A bet was made; you're in early position with players behind.
Обоснование автора: With players still to act, flatting protects you from getting blown off medium hands.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Bomb-pot strategy framework
-
facing_a_bet_late_position_call_linear_raise_polar
Big bet -> continue by equity/pot odds (strong hand or good draw only). Small bet -> CALL the linear category and RAISE the polar category (both value AND weak unmade — gutshot, BDFD, 3rd pair, 2nd pair weak kicker).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: facing a bet in late position
Условие: A bet (maybe bet+call) was made; you're in late position.
Обоснование автора: Raising polar folds out better showdown while your value gets paid; linear prefers to realize equity by calling.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Bomb-pot strategy framework
-
turn_is_key_street_sizing_tell
On the flop 100% ranges are unreadable, but players REVEAL strength via sizing (weak -> small bet/call, strong -> big bet/raise). Having read their flop range, exploit it by playing the turn aggressively; balance is exploit, not GTO.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the turn is the key street
Условие: Reaching the turn after a readable flop.
Обоснование автора: The sizing tell converts an unreadable flop into an exploitable turn.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Bomb-pot strategy framework
-
turn_after_big_flop_action_continue_strong_only
Continue only strong hands (TP good kicker, best draws): the opponent's range is strong, so weak hands can't continue.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: turn after a big flop bet/call
Условие: You made or called a BIG flop bet; now the turn.
Обоснование автора: Big flop action defines a strong range, so you need real equity to keep firing/calling.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Bomb-pot strategy framework
-
turn_polar_category_big_bets_into_weak_line
Always big-bet (3/4 pot) the polar category into his weak line: turn weak showdown (3rd pair, gutshot, A-high, weakest 2nd pair) into a BLUFF to fold out his 2nd pair/weak TP; or big-bet strong hands for value. No overbet needed — the pot is already huge.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: turn: polar category, big bets
Условие: Min-bet flop (or called a min-bet), you hold the polar category; villain showed weakness.
Обоснование автора: His flop call caps him weak, so a big turn bet folds out better showdown while getting value from your strong end.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Bomb-pot strategy framework
-
turn_linear_category_play_calmer
Play calmer — medium hands fear raises, so don't turn them into bluffs. Call small/medium bets; make medium bets to get value from worse (2nd pairs) and realize equity, or to fold out weak showdown when holding good draws.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: turn: linear category, play calmer
Условие: You hold the linear category (TP weak kicker, 2nd pair, good draws) on the turn.
Обоснование автора: Bloating with medium hands invites raises that force crying calls; calm sizing realizes equity.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Bomb-pot strategy framework
-
river_rarely_reached_play_by_strength
Bomb pots usually resolve on the turn; if you reach the river, play by hand strength + opponent. Missed draw -> assess whether villain (who barreled flop+turn, so a stronger range) will fold: bluff cautious opponents, give up vs sticky ones.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: river play
Условие: The rare bomb pot that reaches the river.
Обоснование автора: A double-barreled range is strong, so river bluffs only work against careful, foldable opponents.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Bomb-pot strategy framework
Профики покера слили всё фишам за 7 дней Стрим хаты. Топ-5 приемов NL10 #poker #покер #avrora Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 16
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
nl10_highest_rake_use_rakeback
NL10 has the highest rake (~10-12bb/100 = a buyin per 1000 hands); rake falls as you move up. Beat it with rakeback or move up — no shame in beating NL10 with rakeback.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: NL10 has the highest rake
Условие: Grinding NL10 without rakeback.
Обоснование автора: High rake eats the whole winrate, so rakeback or a lower-rake limit is required.
Review: Не проверено
-
hard_table_selection_over_zoom
Play regular tables and hard-select for weak fish (who spew 50-80bb/100). Avoid zoom/fast tables — winrate is capped at 2-4bb/100 there (quick folds, no dynamics).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: table-select hard, avoid zoom
Условие: Choosing where to play at micro limits.
Обоснование автора: Sitting with spewy fish multiplies your winrate; zoom prevents seat selection.
Review: Не проверено
-
bankroll_to_winrate
Bankroll to your winrate (variance calc): ~15-20 buyins at 10bb/100, ~75 at 2bb/100, 50-100 for zoom, ~50 conservative at your working limit. Don't play deep-stacked with only 5-7 effective buyins.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: bankroll to your winrate
Условие: Deciding stakes and buy-in depth.
Обоснование автора: Underrolling guarantees you re-deposit through normal downswings.
Review: Не проверено
-
play_in_optimal_state
Play rested with full concentration: warm up, remove distractions (no YouTube/chat/checking results), 1-2h sessions with breaks. A bad state drops a high-stakes reg to NL10 skill.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: play with concentration
Условие: Sitting down to play.
Обоснование автора: Concentration is the scarcest resource; a poor state torches a week's profit in a session.
Review: Не проверено
-
low_winrate_raises_downswing_risk
The lower your winrate, the higher the downswing risk: 2bb/100 -> ~67% chance of a losing 50k-hand stretch; 10bb/100 -> 2.5%. Raise your winrate via selection to cut variance.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: low winrate = big downswings
Условие: Assessing why you run bad over a stretch.
Обоснование автора: Small edges get swamped by variance; a bigger edge shrinks the losing stretches.
Review: Не проверено
-
size_vs_fish_play_like_a_fish
Don't balance — fish call similar sizings at the same frequency. Strong hands bet BIG (3/4 pot minimum, the gold standard, or more); medium/semibluff bet MEDIUM (1/2, lower required fold equity); weak hands small or check.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: size vs fish: play the hand as it looks
Условие: In a pot with a hobby player (fish).
Обоснование автора: Since call frequency is flat across sizes, size up value and size down bluffs.
Review: Не проверено
-
preflop_bigger_sizings_vs_fish
Open bigger from late position (3-5bb, not 2.5); 3-bet strong hands big (10-15bb: QQ+/AK), decent hands 9bb (AQ/AJ/99/TT), and iso-fish with a small 3-bet (6bb, KTs) to WIDEN their calling range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: preflop sizing vs fish
Условие: Preflop vs hobby players.
Обоснование автора: Bigger pre snowballs the value pot; fish call the extra bb regardless.
Review: Не проверено
-
postflop_sizing_vs_fish
Value: 3/4 flop, 3/4+/overbet turn. Semibluff: small flop (1/3-1/2), 2/3-3/4 turn with 8-out+ draws only. Weak SDV (2nd/3rd pair IP): 1/3-1/2 or check to reach a cheap showdown. River bluff only if you read well (fish are stations).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: postflop sizing vs fish
Условие: Postflop vs hobby players by hand type.
Обоснование автора: Sizing to hand type maximizes value from stations and minimizes bluff cost.
Review: Не проверено
-
limp_pots_bet_your_hand
Bet your hand: weak hands small (~1bb, 1/3-1/2) to realize equity and set the price; strong hands 2x-overbet (5bb into 2.5 — fish see '50 cents', not '2x pot'). Don't check-check weak pairs.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: limp pots: bet, don't check
Условие: A limped pot with a fish (BB with any two, fish limp-called).
Обоснование автора: Fish size-blind by absolute dollars, so overbets get paid and small bets deny/realize equity.
Review: Не проверено
-
regs_overfold_at_nl10
Regs overfold: fold-to-cbet OOP ~55%, river ~60%; huge check-line overfolds (~55-60% after checking). On the river they fold busted draws, 2nd pairs, even top pair weak kicker.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: regs overfold at NL10
Условие: Facing NL10 regs postflop.
Обоснование автора: A pool that over-folds is exploited by more aggression, not by balance.
Review: Не проверено
-
regs_underbluff_single_shot
Regs under-bluff: low check-raise (7-10%), small turn/river raises, rarely triple-barrel or overbet-bluff ('single-shot' — one bluff then honest). They don't attack capped ranges or read texture.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: regs under-bluff
Условие: Facing NL10 regs' aggression.
Обоснование автора: A single-shot, low-bluff pool means their big multi-street lines are value.
Review: Не проверено
-
exploit_regs_wide_cbet_polar_barrels_stab_checks
C-bet WIDE in position (auto-profit, no protection needed); polar 2nd barrels (value + 7-out+ draws); river bluff 3/4-overbet (they overfold). Stab their checks with any two (1/2 pot), then give up or fire a big 3rd bluff. Play straightforward in multiway (bet TP weak kicker/draws yourself; don't check to 'realize equity').
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: exploit regs postflop
Условие: In position vs NL10 regs who overfold.
Обоснование автора: Overfolding, under-bluffing opponents get run over by straightforward aggression.
Review: Не проверено
-
dont_value_own_on_bad_runouts
No thin river value bets — they overfold, so you value-bet yourself. Even AK on a super-blank A-T-7-9-4 has ~41% (they fold weak Ax). On blank rivers bet SMALL (1/3-1/2) or check; on scary runouts (flush/straight) just CHECK (hit the brakes).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: don't value-own on bad runouts
Условие: River value decision vs regs/fish who overfold.
Обоснование автора: Against an overfolding range a big river bet only gets called by better -> value-owning.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Value & river discipline at micro (inelastic range, overfold)
-
overfold_big_pots_vs_regs
Overfold: they don't triple-barrel or overbet-bluff, so fold to 3 barrels (even TPGK), to strong lines (an overbet reps one thing), and to big multiway action. NL10 is beaten by overfolds.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: overfold big pots vs regs
Условие: Facing three barrels / overbets / big multiway action from NL10 regs.
Обоснование автора: A near-bluffless pool makes big-line bluff-catches -EV.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Value & river discipline at micro (inelastic range, overfold)
-
rake_dictates_preflop
No cold-calls on free positions (MP/CO/BTN/SB) — 3-bet playable hands or fold (a call pays rake). Defend BB WIDE (each fold costs ~-100bb/100 to the blind). No light 4-bet jams (fish/regs don't 4-bet-bluff -> no fold equity). Over-steal the SB (BB overfolds). Learn an NL10-tuned preflop model; don't copy NL500-1000 (64s BB multiway loses to rake).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: rake dictates preflop
Условие: Preflop strategy at a high-rake micro limit.
Обоснование автора: Rake punishes limps/cold-calls, so a tighter-open/wider-BB, aggression-only preflop is +EV.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Rake-driven preflop
-
nl10_summary_dont_fear_capping
Don't fear capping your range or being exploited at low limits — you're exploiting the pool. But don't over-value rivers (regs overfold -> value-owning on bad runouts), fold big to regs who don't bluff, and treat a strong NL10-tuned preflop as the main growth point.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: summary: exploit, don't balance
Условие: Overall NL10 approach.
Обоснование автора: Micro pools reward straightforward exploitation over high-stakes balance.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Rake-driven preflop
Негреану, Иннер, Инвокер. Топ-5 приемов кэш покера NL5. Как бы играли топы? #покер #poker #обучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 13
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
tag_the_table_two_types
Categorize opponents: WEAK REGS (no limp, 100bb, open/3bet standard sizes, overfold to c-bets 50-60%, fold to raises, c-bet small a lot) vs PASSIVE HOBBY players (limp, short stacks, unusual lines/donk/min-raise/extreme sizes, rarely fold to c-bets, overplay hands). Tag before acting.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: tag the table first
Условие: Sitting down at NL2/NL5.
Обоснование автора: The two pool types need opposite exploits, so identify them first.
Review: Не проверено
-
snowball_cbet_vs_weak_regs
C-bet almost always (70-100%) small (1/3-1/2): regs fold-to-cbet 50-60%, so at 1/2 pot (required 33%) you print auto-profit. C-bet air + any two.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: snowball c-bet vs weak regs
Условие: In position vs a weak reg who overfolds to c-bets.
Обоснование автора: An overfolding pool makes a cheap wide c-bet auto-profit.
Review: Не проверено
-
snowball_hand_selection_check_medium
Bet air + potential (gutshot+overcard, OESD 8-out, FD 9-out) + value (TPGK+). CHECK BACK medium hands (2nd/3rd pair, overcards, bare gutshot) — on the turn the reg's range narrows, so bet only strong hands + good equity into it.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: snowball hand selection
Условие: Building the snowball c-bet range IP vs regs.
Обоснование автора: Cheap air prints now; medium hands realize better as checks into a narrowing range.
Review: Не проверено
-
checkraise_and_stab_vs_regs
Regs are vulnerable to check-raises (they c-bet small then fold to raises) — raise their c-bets with good-potential hands (gutshot/backdoors that can make the nuts). And STAB missed c-bets with any two cards — they can't split c-bet/check and give up.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: check-raise and stab weak lines
Условие: A weak reg c-bets small a lot, or opens but skips the c-bet.
Обоснование автора: A pool that c-bets weak and can't defend checks folds to raises and stabs.
Review: Не проверено
-
svinskaya_game_vs_hobby_players
Play super-unbalanced (no GTO): strong hands big (3-bet 10-14bb pre; postflop bet big, don't slow-play); weak/semibluff small (1/2-1/3 IP); weak SDV check. Fish don't fold, so sizing is your whole edge.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: play the hand as it looks vs fish
Условие: In a pot with a passive hobby player.
Обоснование автора: Against sticky stations you extract with big value and risk little with small bluffs.
Review: Не проверено
-
ip_bet_potential_hands_vs_fish
Bet all decent-potential hands IP (gutshot 4-out, 7-8-out draws) — fish don't fold, especially IP, so you get value/realize equity. OOP pick stronger not-made hands to bet and CHECK the weak ones.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: IP bet all decent-potential hands vs fish
Условие: In position vs a fish who rarely folds to c-bets.
Обоснование автора: Fish fold least in position, so bet your equity; OOP realizes worse so tighten the bets.
Review: Не проверено
-
turn_bet_only_good_equity_vs_fish
Bet only hands with good equity (8-out+ draws, value); check weaker. Even though fish don't fold turns much, into their now-decent range you want real equity behind your bets.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: turn: bet only good equity vs fish
Условие: On the turn after a wide IP c-bet vs a fish.
Обоснование автора: Barreling air into a sticky range without outs just burns money.
Review: Не проверено
-
isolation_raise_bigger_ip_vs_fish
Open/iso bigger (e.g. 8bb) with your whole IP range (premiums and playables) to build the pot and play heads-up in position vs the fish.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: iso-raise bigger IP vs fish
Условие: A fish limps or you can isolate into position.
Обоснование автора: A bigger iso isolates the fish and inflates the pot you'll play with position.
Review: Не проверено
-
thin_value_bet_big_vs_fish
Bet BIG (3/4 or even overbet): many worse hands pay (9x, 3x, gutshots, FDs, Tx-Qx floats), and fish overpay 2nd pair as 'strong'. On dry non-completing rivers they call light -> value-bet even mediocre top pairs.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: thin value: bet big vs fish
Условие: A confident thin value spot vs a fish (e.g. A2 2nd pair on K-9-3).
Обоснование автора: Stations pay big with worse, so charge maximum even with thin value.
Review: Не проверено
-
rake_dictates_selection_and_position
Rake is ~10-12bb/100 (a stack per 1000 hands at NL5). Beat it by hard table selection so you sit IN POSITION on the hobby player (to his left). That lifts your winrate to +10-15bb/100 after rake.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: beat rake via position on the fish
Условие: High-rake micro limit.
Обоснование автора: Position on the fish is where the money is; a table with fish on your left is bad -> change it.
Review: Не проверено
-
no_coldcalls_no_limps_on_free_positions
Open-raise or 3-bet only on free positions (UTG/MP/CO/BTN/SB) — no limps, no cold-calls (a call pays rake and invites the fish crowd behind). Cold-calls only in the BB vs BTN/CO/UTG. Use a flop model that excludes flop cold-calls.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: no cold-calls / limps on free positions
Условие: Preflop at a high-rake micro limit.
Обоснование автора: Rake punishes limps/cold-calls, so aggression-only preflop protects the winrate.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Rake-driven preflop
-
overfold_vs_hard_action
Fold your top pair / TPGK / overpairs — in raised pots that stack you off, fold them even on the FLOP/TURN (a 5x flop raise -> fold top pair now). Fold KQ-type top pairs to three big barrels. The pool under-bluffs: 'people bluff far less than it seems'.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: overfold vs hard action
Условие: A passive fish / weak reg suddenly jams / big-raises / river check-raises.
Обоснование автора: A near-bluffless pool makes strong-line bluff-catches with one pair -EV.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Value & river discipline at micro (inelastic range, overfold)
-
overfold_vs_weird_expensive_lines
Fold: strange + expensive lines from micro pools are value-heavy (they don't manufacture costly bluffs). Beat opponents with overfolds, not curiosity calls.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: overfold vs weird expensive lines
Условие: Facing an unusual, costly line (limp-min-raise-pot, check-raise-then-check-raise).
Обоснование автора: Costly atypical lines skew to value in a pool that doesn't bluff big.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Value & river discipline at micro (inelastic range, overfold)
Блеф на $500к с мусором в покере! Это азиаты, детка! Принцип блеф рейза #покер #poker #покеробучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 7
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
golden_rule_bluff_raise_selection
Bluff-raise the BOTTOM of your calling range (low call-spectrum) and the TOP of your folding range (top fold-spectrum): hands you'd otherwise call without pleasure or just fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the golden rule for bluff-raises
Условие: Choosing which hands to turn into bluff-raises / check-raises.
Обоснование автора: These weak-but-playable hands make better bluff-raises than passive calls.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Which hands to bluff / bluff-raise: bottom-of-call + top-of-fold
-
define_bottom_of_calling_range
The bottom = hands you call 'without pleasure': weak third pair, A-high/KQ with a backdoor FD, weak/no showdown value but improve potential; usually folded to a second barrel if you don't improve.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: bottom of the calling range
Условие: Identifying the weakest hands you call on a given texture.
Обоснование автора: Hands you reluctantly call and fold to the next barrel are the natural bluff-raise pool.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Which hands to bluff / bluff-raise: bottom-of-call + top-of-fold
-
define_top_of_folding_range
The top of fold = playable hands just below your calling threshold (random suited with backdoors, QJo): normally folds, but the prime extra bluff-raise candidates.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: top of the folding range
Условие: Identifying the best hands you fold on a given texture.
Обоснование автора: The strongest folds carry equity/blockers, so they bluff-raise better than air.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Which hands to bluff / bluff-raise: bottom-of-call + top-of-fold
-
bluff_raise_selection_criteria
Pick hands with weak/no showdown value, some equity/improve potential (backdoors, overcards, gutshot), where the raise folds out villain hands EQUAL or slightly stronger than yours.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: what makes a good bluff-raise hand
Условие: Filtering candidate hands for a bluff-raise.
Обоснование автора: Folding out equal/slightly-better hands is the value of the bluff-raise; backups are the safety net.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Which hands to bluff / bluff-raise: bottom-of-call + top-of-fold
-
bluff_raise_more_vs_aggressive_when_uncertain
Convert these bottom-of-call / top-of-fold hands into flop bluff-raises right away rather than calling passively — especially vs aggressive opponents you can't read.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: when to apply it
Условие: Facing aggressive opponents when you're unsure how to continue.
Обоснование автора: A passive call surrenders initiative; a bluff-raise applies pressure with hands that can't comfortably call down.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Which hands to bluff / bluff-raise: bottom-of-call + top-of-fold
-
threebet_fourbet_pots_make_bluff_raise_credible
Your range holds all the strong hands too, so a small bluff-raise on a scary card (e.g. a turned King) is credible and balanced.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: 3bet/4bet pots support the bluff-raise
Условие: In a 3-bet or 4-bet pot considering a bluff-raise on a scary card.
Обоснование автора: Holding the nutted combos makes the bluff-raise representation believable.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Which hands to bluff / bluff-raise: bottom-of-call + top-of-fold
-
concrete_ruichau_T9s_should_bluff_raise_843
Bluff-raise the flop (bottom of the call range, backups, folds out the weak third pair) instead of calling and then folding the King turn.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: T9s on 8-4-3 in a 4bp should bluff-raise
Условие: 4-bet pot, T9s (T-high, backdoor FD/SD, overcards) on 8-4-3 facing Tan Hua's weak-3rd-pair bet.
Обоснование автора: Calling forfeits the pot to the turn barrel; a flop bluff-raise pressures villain's weak made hand.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Which hands to bluff / bluff-raise: bottom-of-call + top-of-fold
Секретная формула свинских доборов в покере! $300к за 1раздачу Виктора #покер #poker #покеробучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 14
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
ip_3bp_small_cbet_weak_medium_hands
Prefer a small c-bet (1/3-1/2 pot) over checking. Even with low equity you gain from betting.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: IP 3bp: c-bet weak/medium hands
Условие: In position in a 3-bet pot with a weak/medium hand (underpair, 2nd/3rd pair, A-high).
Обоснование автора: Betting captures several edges a check forfeits (below).
Review: Не проверено
-
why_cbet_ip_3bp_reasons
A c-bet: denies live equity (even ~25-30%), folds out villain's improve/bluff equity (he can't barrel your check later), gets calls from worse (some Ax/weak pairs), and lets YOU set the cheap price at which you reach the river.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: why the c-bet beats a check
Условие: Weighing c-bet vs check IP in a 3-bet pot.
Обоснование автора: Denial + fold-equity-removal + value from worse + price control outweigh the small risk.
Review: Не проверено
-
cbet_ip_3bp_keeps_range_uncapped
Don't check — it screams no strong hand (strong hands c-bet those boards), capping your range. A small c-bet keeps your range uncapped (tings, overpairs, broadways all bet) and easier to play later.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: don't cap your range
Условие: Deciding whether to check back a draw/dry board IP in a 3bp.
Обоснование автора: An uncapped betting range protects your later-street checks and value.
Review: Не проверено
-
ip_3bp_simplify_cbet_all_playable_small
Simplify: c-bet ALL playable hands small (1/3-1/2). Check vs c-bet EV is close in solvers, but IP the c-bet's upsides make it the easy default; OOP is different (don't always bet).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the IP 3bp simplification
Условие: Playing 3-bet pots in position (not OOP).
Обоснование автора: A single small-c-bet rule captures most of the EV without street-by-street agonizing.
Review: needs_context
-
burn_time_bank_on_river_sizing
Burn time-bank: the river holds the biggest pots and sizing mistakes hurt winrate most. Don't autopilot a standard 3/4.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: tank the river for sizing
Условие: On the river in a large pot choosing a value sizing.
Обоснование автора: Marginal sizing dollars at big pots dominate your winrate.
Review: Не проверено
-
step1_identify_initial_range
First identify the INITIAL range that reached this street via the line (e.g. check flop + call turn + check river = a capped, medium/weak range).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: step 1: the initial range
Условие: Starting the river sizing decision.
Обоснование автора: Knowing what got here frames everything that follows.
Review: Не проверено
-
step2_initial_range_not_calling_range
Crucial correction: the initial range is NOT the calling range — he folds part of it to a bet. Think about the CONTINUATION/calling range: will he continue with strong or weak hands?
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: step 2: initial range != calling range
Условие: Estimating how much value you can get.
Обоснование автора: Sizing must target what actually calls, not merely what arrived.
Review: Не проверено
-
hand_strength_is_relative_to_opponent
The SAME hand is 'strong' to a hobby player (thinks absolute strength — calls top pair as strong) but 'medium' to a thinking nit (thinks ranges). Size to how THIS opponent perceives his calling hands.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hand strength is relative
Условие: Judging how villain values his own calling hands.
Обоснование автора: Fish overvalue top pair and pay big; nits fold it, so the same board demands different sizes.
Review: Не проверено
-
size_by_the_calling_range_strength
Strong calling range -> big/overbet; medium -> medium (1/2-3/4 so he calls bluff-catchers); weak/capped -> small (1/3-1/4). Don't blindly fire 3/4 into a range that won't pay it.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: size by the calling range
Условие: Choosing a river value size from the calling range.
Обоснование автора: Each range strength has a size that maximizes calls x value.
Review: Не проверено
-
heterogeneity_choose_extremes_not_middle
Pick an EXTREME: a small bet (called often by the weak part) OR a huge overbet (called rarely but by the strong part for far more). Avoid the middle (1/2-3/4) — weak folds and strong underpays.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: extremes over the golden mean
Условие: Villain's calling range is heterogeneous (mostly weak + a small strong slice that won't raise).
Обоснование автора: A middling size gets neither the volume of the weak part nor the max from the strong part.
Review: Не проверено
-
best_bet_ev_formula
Estimate EV ~= call_frequency x equity_when_called x bet_size for each size and pick the max. E.g. 2x overbet: 20% x 100% x 40bb ~= 8bb vs 1/3 pot: 80% x equity x 7bb ~= 5-6bb -> overbet wins.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the best-bet EV formula
Условие: Comparing candidate river sizings.
Обоснование автора: A back-of-envelope EV comparison beats an autopiloted standard size.
Review: Не проверено
-
fractions_of_bb_matter_over_volume
Don't: the spot recurs thousands of times, so 1-2bb/100 x thousands = whole buyins. Hunting these small edges is what separates top regs from good ones.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: why fractions of a bb matter
Условие: Tempted to dismiss a 1-2bb sizing edge as trivial.
Обоснование автора: Tiny edges compound over volume into real winrate.
Review: Не проверено
-
formula_caveats_and_bluffraise_bonus
The formula is simplified (ignores fold equity, raises, etc.) but good for estimating. Bonus: small bets can also induce bluff-raises, adding value the formula doesn't capture.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: caveats and a bonus
Условие: Applying the formula in practice.
Обоснование автора: Real spots add factors, but the estimate plus the induce upside still guides sizing.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_malinovsky_small_river_value_bet
Bet small (~1/3), not an overbet: few hands call a big bet, but a small bet gets called by TT-type bluff-catchers (and might induce a raise). Correct thin value given the capped weak range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Malinovsky small-bets the nut flush
Условие: Malinovsky rivers the nut flush on a paired/flush board; Wong's range (called turn, checks river) is capped and weak (TT-type bluff-catchers).
Обоснование автора: An overbet folds out his bluff-catchers; the small bet extracts from them.
Review: Не проверено
Акула покера стал добычей: -$1.5 млн азиатам-миллионерам. #покер #poker #покеробучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 9
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
six_factor_river_herofold_framework
Tank the time-bank and weigh six factors: (1) villain's value quantity, (2) range width, (3) opponent type, (4) line unusualness, (5) how your line looks to him, (6) blockers / better call candidates. Usually resolved in 3-4.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the six-factor river hero-fold framework
Условие: A borderline river call/fold vs an unknown opponent.
Обоснование автора: A structured weighing beats autopilot or a GTO-0EV rationalization in big pots.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: River hero-fold frameworks (combos + discounting + 6 factors)
-
factor1_value_quantity_dominates
The most important factor: if there's a TON of value (many straights/trips/boats), fold your bluff-catchers — nothing else matters. Don't invent exploit-calls.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 1: how much value?
Условие: Assessing villain's betting range on the river.
Обоснование автора: A value-saturated range beats a bluff-catcher regardless of the other factors.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: River hero-fold frameworks (combos + discounting + 6 factors)
-
factor2_range_width_more_absolute_bluffs
The wider the arriving range, the MORE absolute bluffs — even at a low bluff %. 200 combos x 20% = 40 bluffs. Correct the 'passive fish don't bluff' error: a wide range means CALL more.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 2: range width
Условие: Weighing how many bluffs villain has.
Обоснование автора: Absolute bluff count, not bluff percentage, drives the bluff-catch.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: River hero-fold frameworks (combos + discounting + 6 factors)
-
factor3_assume_passive_vs_unknowns
Passive bluffs less, aggressive more. Vs UNKNOWNS assume PASSIVE: most hobby players are passive, and unknown regs play straightforward (they don't run big bluffs against players they can't read). Lean fold — unless value is little AND the range is wide.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 3: opponent type (assume passive vs unknowns)
Условие: Facing an unknown opponent.
Обоснование автора: Unknowns under-bluff on average, so the base rate favors folding marginal catchers.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: River hero-fold frameworks (combos + discounting + 6 factors)
-
factor4_unusual_expensive_line
Lean fold: strange + expensive lines are value-heavy (pools can't manufacture new bluff lines). A check-call-check-call then overbet, or a stab then overbet, is usually value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 4: unusual + expensive line
Условие: Villain takes a weird, costly river line.
Обоснование автора: Costly atypical lines skew to value because bluffs prefer cheap, familiar routes.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: River hero-fold frameworks (combos + discounting + 6 factors)
-
factor5_how_your_line_looks
If no draws completed, no scare cards, and you rep bluff-catchers, villain won't bluff into it (he'd get looked up) -> a bet is value -> lean fold. If he bluffs a bad-for-bluffing spot anyway, that skews him to value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 5: how your line looks
Условие: Deciding whether the situation invites a bluff.
Обоснование автора: A spot that discourages bluffing means the bet is disproportionately value.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: River hero-fold frameworks (combos + discounting + 6 factors)
-
factor6_blockers_and_better_call_candidates
Does your hand block his value (straights/boats)? If it blocks nothing and BETTER call-candidates exist (A6/76/67 blocking 86/6x/straights), fold. A GTO 0-EV call is not a reason to call.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 6: blockers / better call candidates
Условие: For solver-workers, refining the marginal call.
Обоснование автора: Hands that block his value defend; hands that block nothing should yield to those.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: River hero-fold frameworks (combos + discounting + 6 factors)
-
overpair_wet_multiway_straightforward
Solver checks KK on 8-6-5+FD HU (avoid check-raises from combo draws/2pair; only ~2 streets); but at LOW limits multiway, play straightforward — bet big for value and fold to a multiway check-raise. Don't over-complicate with fancy checks.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: overpairs on wet multiway boards
Условие: An overpair (KK) on a wet board (8-6-5+FD), multiway at low limits.
Обоснование автора: Fancy checks lose value and information against a straightforward multiway pool.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
concrete_malinovsky_KK_fold_vs_quads
Fold: tons of value (straights 97/57, trips A8/K8, boats 88/66/55, quads), KK blocks nothing, and it's an overbet-jam. Chau shows 88 (quads). A correct hero-fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Malinovsky folds KK to the overbet-jam
Условие: Malinovsky KK checks flop (8-6-5+FD 3-way), calls turn, faces a river overbet-jam on the 8-paired 8-6-5-2-8.
Обоснование автора: Overwhelming value plus zero blockers makes even KK an easy fold.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: River hero-fold frameworks (combos + discounting + 6 factors)
Квартира на кону! Топ-1 игрок в покер VS Турист-миллионер. Велью-блефы #покер #poker #покеробучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 10
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
value_bluff_definition
A value-bluff = a bet without an equity edge (<50%, called you lose more than win) that is still +EV via the SYNERGY of live equity (~30-40%) and fold equity. It's neither a classic value bet nor a pure bluff.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: what a value-bluff is
Условие: You have a made hand but no equity edge vs the calling range (applies only OOP vs strong aggressive opponents — see r002/r005).
Обоснование автора: Equity you'd win sometimes plus folds you generate combine into a profitable bet.
Review: Не проверено
-
value_bluff_requirement_oop
Use value-bluffs only OUT of position (3-bet pots, sometimes a river SRP): OOP you can't check to a free showdown — a strong opponent barrels your check and traps you.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: requirement 1: out of position
Условие: Deciding where value-bluffs apply.
Обоснование автора: In position you'd just check back for a free showdown; OOP you can't, so betting is the fix.
Review: Не проверено
-
value_bluff_requirement_live_equity
You must have real equity vs the continuation range — beat his bluff-catchers, ~30-40% vs the calling range. If equity is ~10-15%, there's no synergy — don't value-bluff.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: requirement 2: live equity
Условие: Assessing whether a value-bluff qualifies.
Обоснование автора: Below a threshold your made-hand equity can't combine with fold equity into +EV.
Review: Не проверено
-
value_bluff_requirement_fold_equity
He must fold worse hands / hands he'd have bluffed you with. Without fold equity (equity too low to matter) it isn't a value-bluff.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: requirement 3: fold equity
Условие: Assessing whether a value-bluff qualifies.
Обоснование автора: Folding out his would-be bluffs and worse value is half of the synergy.
Review: Не проверено
-
value_bluff_vs_strong_aggressive_only
Only vs STRONG, aggressive opponents: they punish your checks (polarize, jam value + bluffs, poker-mat you). A value-bluff flips the tough decision onto them instead.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: requirement 4: strong aggressive opponents
Условие: Choosing whom to value-bluff.
Обоснование автора: Against a player who exploits checks, betting first denies him the easy spot.
Review: Не проверено
-
just_check_vs_weak_passive
Don't value-bluff — just CHECK. Passive players rarely bluff your check and take made hands to showdown, so a bet only gets called by better. Realize your ~5-6bb of showdown equity by checking.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: vs weak/passive: just check
Условие: A bad runout kills your value vs a weak/passive/linear opponent.
Обоснование автора: With no fold equity and calls only from better, betting just loses value.
Review: Не проверено
-
prerequisite_master_value_and_bluff_first
Master simple value bets (equity >50% = value) and simple bluffs first; otherwise you'll mislabel every marginal bet a 'value-bluff' and over-use it.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: prerequisite: value and bluff basics
Условие: Before attempting value-bluffs.
Обоснование автора: Value-bluffs sit between the two concepts, so you must know each cleanly.
Review: Не проверено
-
typical_trigger_bad_runout_ruins_value
When a flush/straight completes or an overcard hits and kills your classic value bet while a check-call is also bad, the value-bluff is the alternative line.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: typical trigger
Условие: Top pair good kicker / overpair OOP in a 3bp when a bad runout ruins the board (vs a strong aggressive opponent — value-bluffs apply only there).
Обоснование автора: A scary runout removes worse callers and cheap showdowns, leaving the value-bluff.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_joey_KK_should_value_bluff_jam
Jam (value-bluff): ~50% vs Linus's bluff-catchers + he folds worse, and it forces the best player to decide. Checking lets Linus polarize (straights + bluffs) and poker-mat him. Joey check-called and lost to A4 (the wheel).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Joey KK should value-bluff jam
Условие: Joey KK on 7-5-6-2-3 OOP vs Linus (best player); river completes straights.
Обоснование автора: Betting captures fold equity and equity while denying Linus the easy exploit of a check.
Review: Не проверено
-
earlier_street_note_KK_size_up_or_bet_three
His tiny flop check-raise was too small; with KK (few straights/sets in Linus's range, many worse overpairs 88-QQ) raise bigger, or just bet three streets for value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: earlier-street note: KK line
Условие: Joey KK IP... OOP as the 3-bettor on 7-5-6 facing a missed c-bet.
Обоснование автора: A bigger line extracts from the many worse overpairs before the board can ruin.
Review: Не проверено
Покер фейс на $300к. Антониус обчистил миллионера. Мета-гейм в покере #покер #poker #покеробучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
metagame_definition_and_purpose
Metagame = the average tendencies of your pool (how regs/fish play on average, how much bluff lives in each line/sizing). Study it to exploit, not for fun — to adjust your strategy.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: what metagame is
Условие: Building a strategy for a specific stake/pool.
Обоснование автора: Knowing average tendencies is what lets you deviate profitably.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Metagame & exploitative adjustments
-
how_to_learn_metagame_range_research
Learn it via a large personal sample (100-150k hands), hand reviews, coaching, or RANGE/HAND research: group typical opponents in a DB (Hand2Note/HM) and read, per line/sizing, which hands and how often they bluff.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: measuring the metagame
Условие: You want to know your pool's tendencies.
Обоснование автора: A DB of grouped opponents gives per-sizing bluff frequencies you can exploit.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Metagame & exploitative adjustments
-
pool_small_river_sizing_means_value
At low stakes a small river sizing contains almost NO bluffs — it's thin/merge value; bluffs go into big sizings (3/4/overbet/jam) because bluffs want fold equity.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the pool sizing tell on the river
Условие: Facing a small river bet (1/3-1/2 pot) from a typical pool opponent.
Обоснование автора: Bluffs need fold equity, so the pool puts them in big sizes; small sizes are value.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Metagame & exploitative adjustments
-
exploit_fold_bluffcatchers_vs_small_river_bet
Fold your bluff-catchers — don't be tempted by pot odds; call only with 2-pair+. The price is a trap when the sizing is (almost) all value.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: response to the small river bet
Условие: Holding a bluff-catcher facing a small river bet from the pool.
Обоснование автора: Pot odds are irrelevant when the bettor is never bluffing.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Metagame & exploitative adjustments
-
exploit_low_stakes_thin_value_small_dont_bluff_small
Thin-value bet small (they call cheaply with anything, never asking if the sizing lacks bluffs); and do NOT bluff small (they call regardless of price).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: exploits vs the low-stakes pool
Условие: vs NL25-type opponents who don't think about ranges.
Обоснование автора: Stations pay small value bets and call small bluffs, so size for value not for folds.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Metagame & exploitative adjustments
-
leveling_bluff_small_vs_thinking_opponents
Flip it: BLUFF small. They fold believing there are no bluffs in that sizing, so you get near-equal fold equity for a cheap price (leveling — a step ahead of the metagame).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: counter-exploit vs thinking opponents
Условие: vs NL100/200 opponents who did their own research and know small sizing = value.
Обоснование автора: Exploiting their knowledge of the pool, not the pool itself, gets cheap folds.
Review: Не проверено
-
big_sizing_polar_small_sizing_merge
A big bet is polar (strong value or bluff); a small bet is value-heavy/merge with little bluff. A bigger size would read as a more credible polar bluff, but the value-looking small size is exactly what beats a thinking caller.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: what each sizing represents for the bettor
Условие: Choosing a river sizing as the bettor.
Обоснование автора: The small size's value-perception is the disguise; the big size announces polarity.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_antonius_97s_leveling_small_bluff
A leveling bluff: the small 'value' sizing reps thin value (9s/Ts, slowplayed Jx/8x/3x) to a villain who reads Antonius as a paying fish and knows small=value, so the cheap bluff folds out his bluff-catchers.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Antonius small-bluffs 97s on J-8-3-x-brick
Условие: 3bet (squeezed) pot, 97s on J-8-3, river bricks; checks twice then bets 1/3 (125k/300k).
Обоснование автора: Disguising the bluff as merge value exploits the opponent's own sizing read.
Review: Не проверено
Линус в покере = Месси в футболе. Наказал слоу-плей АА на $500к! #покер #poker #покеробучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 12
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
dont_slowplay_strong_hands_vs_aggressive
Play it fast: 4-bet AA rather than flat a 3-bet-squeeze; raise your c-bet with a set rather than trap. Strong hands want big pots.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: don't slow-play vs strong aggressives
Условие: You hold a strong hand (AA pre, a set postflop) vs an aggressive strong opponent.
Обоснование автора: Trapping a strong aggressive opponent forfeits value and control; fast-play builds the pot you want.
Review: Не проверено
-
deny_equity_realization_multiway
Fast-play to deny equity realization: AA wins ~80% heads-up but only ~65% vs two ranges, and worse multiway. More opponents -> AA wins less, so charge them and don't let them realize cheaply.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: deny equity realization, especially multiway
Условие: Strong hand, one or more opponents left to realize equity.
Обоснование автора: Passive lines let multiple opponents realize equity that erodes even AA's edge.
Review: Не проверено
-
slowplay_makes_you_fall_in_love
Don't: slow-playing makes you commit mentally and stop reading runouts, so you won't fold when you should (deep stacks / bad boards sometimes require folding even AA). Fast-play keeps decisions honest.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: slow-play breeds falling in love
Условие: You've internally decided to stack off with a slow-played monster.
Обоснование автора: A pre-committed trap ignores the runouts that should sometimes fold the hand.
Review: Не проверено
-
slowplay_loses_the_cooler
Fast-play to keep the ability to COOLER him: his strong hands stack off to a 4-bet/raise now, but on scary runouts (overcards) they won't. Slow-playing loses the stack you could have won.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: slow-play forfeits the cooler
Условие: Villain has strong hands (AK/KK/QQ) that pay now but may not later.
Обоснование автора: Value from his strong hands evaporates on scary cards, so collect the cooler early.
Review: Не проверено
-
strong_hands_want_big_pots_solver
Almost always 4-bet AA/KK/AK/QQ preflop (solver rarely flats); strong hands want to see big pots. Don't slow-play them pre or postflop.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: strong hands want big pots
Условие: Deciding how to play premiums preflop/postflop.
Обоснование автора: Premiums maximize by growing the pot while ahead, not by disguising strength.
Review: Не проверено
-
slowplay_urge_reason_villain_often_has_nothing
Often villain simply has no hand to pay your 4-bet/raise (he 3-bet-bluffed and folds). That's fine — winning the 3-bet ~15bb x100 spots = ~150bb; don't let it push you toward slow-playing.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: why you don't always win big (1)
Условие: You fast-played and won only a small pot.
Обоснование автора: Frequent small pickups compound; they aren't evidence that fast-play is wrong.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Room for error (exploit sizing)
-
room_for_error_definition
Leave villain space to err: BOTH extremes fail — passive slow-play AND over-sized bets/jams (he folds bluffs, only continues when ahead, plays perfectly). Use a size that keeps him able to make a mistake.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: leave room for error
Условие: Sizing a 4-bet / raise with a strong hand.
Обоснование автора: A size villain can't misplay against captures none of his mistakes.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Room for error (exploit sizing)
-
room_for_error_correct_sizings
Keep sizes moderate so your range still has bluffs: over a 10bb 3-bet 4-bet to ~22-23bb (not 35bb); raise an 8bb c-bet to ~8bb (not 15bb). Not too small, not too big — balanced sizings that leave room to err.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: correct room-for-error sizings
Условие: Choosing 4-bet / raise sizes vs regulars.
Обоснование автора: Moderate sizings keep villain's continuing range wide enough to make mistakes.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Room for error (exploit sizing)
-
room_for_error_vs_fish_ignore_balance
Give a small 'unbalanced' click-4bet you'd skip for GTO balance — the fish over-commits and pays. Don't jam AA/sets into a fish; leave room for his leaks (over-calling, over-bluffing, falling in love).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: room for error vs fish: ignore balance
Условие: An aggressive fish over-sizes 3-bets/4-bets (e.g. min-3bet-squeeze 20bb).
Обоснование автора: Fish make the errors only if your sizing leaves them room; balance is irrelevant vs them.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Room for error (exploit sizing)
-
concrete_HN_should_4bet_AA
4-bet (to ~100k): flatting slow-plays AA into a multiway, deep, aggressive spot and forfeits the cooler. But don't jam either — a flat-4bet leaves room for error; a jam does not.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: HN should 4-bet AA
Условие: HN holds AA facing Linus's 3-bet-squeeze to 50k; flats instead of 4-betting.
Обоснование автора: Flatting traps into a bad multiway runout; a moderate 4-bet keeps value and room to err.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Room for error (exploit sizing)
-
concrete_HN_river_fold_AA_correct
Correct fold: many stronger hands (AK 8 combos, QQ/JJ sets, K9s) in Linus's jamming line and few bluffs (HN rarely folds, so Linus bluffs less). A rare good hero-fold of AA.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: HN's river fold of AA is correct
Условие: River 5 on Q-J-5-T-5; Linus jams 200k; HN tank-folds AA.
Обоснование автора: Against a value-heavy jamming range with few bluffs, even AA is behind.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Gear changes & off-range reads
-
slowplay_leak_generalizes_to_low_stakes
Don't slow-play there either: c-bet-raise. Playing passively lets villain realize equity (backdoors, straight draws), makes you fall in love on bad runouts, and forfeits coolering his AT/KK/QJ.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the leak generalizes to low stakes
Условие: Flopping a set on a dry board (e.g. 77 on 10-7-2) even vs a fish.
Обоснование автора: The same fast-play reasons (deny equity, avoid love, keep the cooler) apply at every stake.
Review: Не проверено
Нуб в покере поплыл с топ парой. Учись чекать ТП! #покер #poker #покеробучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 11
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
cbet_tp_weak_kicker_flop_is_fine
C-betting is NOT a mistake on the flop — you have ~73% equity and get called by worse. The problem starts later, not on the flop.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: c-betting TP weak kicker on the flop is fine
Условие: Top pair weak kicker (K6) in position on the flop.
Обоснование автора: High flop equity and value from worse make the flop c-bet correct.
Review: needs_context
-
turn_barrel_tp_weak_kicker_marginal
The turn value bet is very marginal (~58% equity, ~8% edge) and check-raises burn your equity. Often CHECK the turn instead of a thin 2nd barrel.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the turn barrel is marginal
Условие: Top pair weak kicker after a flop c-bet, deciding to 2nd-barrel.
Обоснование автора: A thin value bet that gets check-raised loses more than it gains.
Review: needs_context
-
split_range_ip_from_the_flop
Split your flop range into c-bets and checks from the flop, so turn/river play is clear. Don't blindly c-bet your whole range and get lost later.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: split your range into c-bets and checks
Условие: In position on the flop as the aggressor.
Обоснование автора: A planned split makes later streets simple and avoids the marginal spots.
Review: concept
-
check_showdown_value_too_weak_to_bet
Check them: they have showdown value but are too weak to value-bet 3 streets. C-betting them only helps vs non-check-raisers; vs anyone who check-raises 15-20% it's bad.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: check showdown value too weak to bet
Условие: Underpairs, best 2nd pairs, some Ax in position.
Обоснование автора: Weak showdown value realizes better by checking than by betting into raises.
Review: trainer_candidate
-
three_street_value_test_for_top_pair
Ask from the flop: can I value-bet 3 streets with this hand? Hands that can (KQ/AK/KJ, KT optional) bet; hands that can't (K6/K4 weak kickers) CHECK.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the three-street value test
Условие: Holding a top pair and choosing bet vs check.
Обоснование автора: If worse hands won't call 3 streets, betting only isolates you against better.
Review: needs_context
-
check_some_draws_to_protect_range
Include some draws in your check-back (FD+pair, FD+SDV, A-high FD): they let you reach cheap showdowns AND keep flushes/straights in your checking range so villain can't freely barrel scary turns/rivers.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: check some draws to protect the range
Условие: Building your checking range on a draw-heavy board.
Обоснование автора: A checking range with no draws gets bluffed off scary runouts.
Review: concept
-
how_checking_range_plays_turn
Call the turn with all your showdown value (top pairs, underpairs, best Qx/Tx, some 9x); draws that got there continue too. The wide check-back defends comfortably.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: how the checking range plays the turn
Условие: You checked back the flop and face a turn bet.
Обоснование автора: Checking back kept enough medium hands to defend the turn without capping.
Review: Не проверено
-
how_checking_range_plays_river
On a blank, showdown or thin-call top pairs and underpairs (they block villain's value combos). On a bad card (overcard/scare), give up the weakest but never fold genuine two pair/sets — villain can still bluff.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: how the checking range plays the river
Условие: River after checking flop / calling turn.
Обоснование автора: Blocker bluff-catches print on blanks; real value never folds to a bluff-inclusive range.
Review: Не проверено
-
low_limit_wide_cbet_then_check_turn
You can c-bet very wide on the flop and just apply the same check logic on the TURN (barrel value, check weak Kx/underpairs). Trade-off: wide c-betting denies equity but caps you for later bluff-catching.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: low-limit simplification
Условие: Opponents rarely check-raise/barrel (low limits).
Обоснование автора: Passive fields don't punish a wide c-bet, so you can defer the split to the turn.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_hero_should_check_turn
C-bet flop is fine, but the turn barrel is a marginal ~58% value bet that gets check-raised — check it instead (fails the three-street test).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Hero should check the turn
Условие: Student K6 (TP weak kicker) on K-9-5-8; c-bet flop, barrels turn.
Обоснование автора: Too thin to value-bet and vulnerable to a check-raise, so checking realizes more.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_hero_river_fold_correct
Fold is correct: a donk into a range full of our own value is strong (unusual line + into our nutted combos), and K6 is at the bottom.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Hero's river fold is correct
Условие: River donk-bet (unusual line) into our range that holds all the value (KJ/67/KQ/two pair/sets); Hero folds K6.
Обоснование автора: A donk into your value-heavy range represents strength you can't call with a weak kicker.
Review: Не проверено
Отмороженный блеф на $1,5 млн в Бога покера! Стратегия против агрессивных фишей #покер #poker Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
think_whole_range_not_only_bluffs
Don't fixate on his bluffs — think about his WHOLE range in each spot. The common error is assuming a maniac only has air; he also has worse value hands that pay.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: think about his whole range, not only bluffs
Условие: Facing a hyper-aggressive maniac with a strong hand.
Обоснование автора: Playing only for his bluffs forfeits the value his worse made hands would pay.
Review: Не проверено
-
three_questions_fastplay_vs_checkcall
Ask three questions before betting/raising vs checking: (1) does his range hold worse hands that pay? (2) can the board get worse and kill your value? (3) will he over-aggress (raise-bluff your bet)?
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: three questions: fast-play vs check-call
Условие: Holding a strong hand OOP vs an aggressive opponent.
Обоснование автора: The three answers set whether to extract now, protect, or induce.
Review: Не проверено
-
q1_worse_hands_that_pay
If his range holds worse hands that call a bet/raise (he flatted an early open, so has AT/AJ/33/Qx/98/draws) -> FAST-PLAY for value. If few worse hands pay -> check-call and let him bluff.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: Q1: worse hands that pay
Условие: Deciding fast-play vs check-call.
Обоснование автора: Value extraction needs worse hands in the calling range; without them, induce bluffs.
Review: Не проверено
-
q2_board_can_worsen
If a scare card (flush/straight/overcard) would stop his worse hands from paying, FAST-PLAY now while they still pay. If the board is safe, you can go slower.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: Q2: can the board worsen?
Условие: Deciding whether to fast-play now.
Обоснование автора: Value from his worse hands evaporates on scary runouts, so collect it now.
Review: Не проверено
-
q3_induce_with_small_provocative_bet
Use a SMALL provocative bet (1/2-1/3, a 'red rag to the bull') to INDUCE a bluff-raise — vs a maniac who blows up over small sizings you extract more than by checking (he'd bet less if checked to).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: Q3: induce with a small provocative bet
Условие: Villain will over-aggress (check-raise/3-bet-bluff your bets).
Обоснование автора: A tempting small bet triggers his spew, winning more than a check that he'd size down.
Review: Не проверено
-
just_call_polar_reraise
Don't re-raise — just CALL. A polar re-raise means worse hands don't continue, so a 4-bet/jam only folds out his air and gets action from the nuts (or a chop). Calling keeps his bluffs in.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: just call a polar re-raise
Условие: Your bet/raise gets 3-bet or jammed and that re-raise is polar (nuts-or-air).
Обоснование автора: Re-raising a polar range folds out the bluffs and isolates you against the nuts.
Review: Не проверено
-
fast_play_nuts_stop_when_polar
Fast-play (raise their bets) while worse hands pay and they blow up over it; STOP pressing (just call) once their re-raise turns polar (nuts-or-air). Don't slow-play the nuts vs a maniac.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: fast-play the nuts, stop when it turns polar
Условие: Holding the nuts OOP vs a maniac across streets.
Обоснование автора: Aggression extracts until the range polarizes, then calling captures the bluffs.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_neil_KQ_nut_straight_line
Textbook: check-raise the turn (worse hands pay), then just CALL the polar 3-bet (nuts-or-air — no worse pays a 4-bet, and good combo-draws would have flatted, so the 3-bet is bluff/chop), then call the river jam. Tan Hua shows 98s (busted-draw bluff).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Neil's KQ nut straight vs Tan Hua
Условие: Neil KQ nut straight: check-calls flop gutshot, check-raises turn, faces Tan Hua's polar 3-bet.
Обоснование автора: Raise while worse pays, then call once his range is nuts-or-air to keep the bluffs in.
Review: Не проверено
Новый Негреану? Гениальный пас моего ученика в покере. #покер #poker #покеробучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 10
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
dont_fall_in_love_hit_the_brakes
Reassess and find the fold. A common leak is carrying a 'play for stacks' plan across streets even when the runout changes the nut count (board pairs, flush/straight completes). Change the plan when the board changes.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hit the brakes when the board changes
Условие: You mentally committed to stack off a strong hand, then a card radically changes the board.
Обоснование автора: A pre-committed plan ignores the very cards that turn your nuts into a medium hand.
Review: Не проверено
-
polar_checkraise_then_flat_then_check_paired_turn
Check: your nut straight now has only ~36% vs his continuing range (flushes/boats got there), so there's no value bet. A reg's check-raise is polar with no medium hands, so his flats are made hands.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: read the polar check-raise, check the paired turn
Условие: Villain check-raises (polar: sets/2pair/straights + draws), you 3-bet, he flats; the turn pairs the board.
Обоснование автора: A paired board flips your equity below 50%, so betting only isolates you against boats.
Review: Не проверено
-
tank_and_ask_two_questions
Burn the time-bank and answer two questions before deciding: (1) how does MY line look to villain? (2) given that, how does HIS line look? Don't snap-decide.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: tank and ask two questions
Условие: Facing an overbet-jam on the river in a borderline spot.
Обоснование автора: Deliberate range-reasoning beats an autopiloted call or fold in a big pot.
Review: Не проверено
-
q1_how_does_my_line_look
If your line can hold nutted hands / slow-plays (flop 3-bet + check paired turn), it looks STRONG -> villain bluffs into it less -> lean fold. A line that rarely has strong hands looks weak -> he bluffs more -> lean call.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: Q1: how does my line look?
Условие: Deciding whether villain will bluff into your river range.
Обоснование автора: Villains bluff strong-looking ranges less, so a strong-looking line lowers his bluff frequency.
Review: Не проверено
-
q2_how_does_villain_line_look_overbet
Ask if the pool bluffs strong ranges with pot-overbet-jams, or could bluff cheaper. A pot-overbet raises the required fold equity (must fold >60% vs ~43% for 3/4); at low limits people don't over-bluff nutted-looking lines -> lean fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: Q2: how does villain's line look?
Условие: Villain overbet-jams (1.5x pot) into your strong-looking range.
Обоснование автора: Overbet sizing needs more folds to profit as a bluff, which the pool rarely has here.
Review: Не проверено
-
need_equity_margin_vs_overbet_jam
A pot-overbet needs >40% equity (worse odds than a 2x jam) to call profitably. If he bluffs ~50% you have ~31% < 40% -> fold; only if he bluffs near 100% does a call appear.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: need an equity margin vs the overbet-jam
Условие: Calling a pot-overbet-jam on the river.
Обоснование автора: Large sizing lays poor pot odds, so marginal bluff-catchers are -EV.
Review: Не проверено
-
no_information_bets_thin_block_bet_alt
There are NO information bets (info is a byproduct). But a small turn bet (~1/3, 17bb) can be a thin VALUE block-bet: get calls from worse (weaker straights/Tx), deny draw equity (they can't overbet-jam you off), and reach a cheaper showdown.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: alternative: a thin block-bet (not for info)
Условие: On the paired turn considering a small bet.
Обоснование автора: The bet is justified by value and equity denial, with information only a side effect.
Review: Не проверено
-
block_bets_are_value_and_equity_realization
Block-bets are for VALUE + equity realization: usually OOP on the river, or to reach showdown cheaply and minimize losses vs better while denying draws. Especially useful vs unknowns you can't range precisely.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: what block-bets are for
Условие: Considering a small block-bet.
Обоснование автора: A cheap bet controls the pot to showdown and squeezes thin value, unlike an info bet.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_hero_good_fold_qt_straight
Fold is correct: your line reps all the strong hands (straights, boat slow-plays), villain overbet-jams into it anyway, and the pool doesn't overbet-bluff nutted-looking lines at these limits. A good hero-fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Hero's fold of the busted nut straight
Условие: QT nut straight on J-9-8; 3-bet a check-raise, turn 9 pairs (boats possible) -> check; river blank, reg overbet-jams.
Обоснование автора: A strong-looking line + a value-heavy overbet-jam puts your straight behind.
Review: Не проверено
-
when_to_reassess_stackoff_plan
Reassess whenever the runout radically changes the nut count — board pairs, flush/straight completes, an overcard hits. Look for the fold button you were about to skip.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: when to reassess the stack-off plan
Условие: You were ready to stack off but the runout changes.
Обоснование автора: The cards that change the board are exactly the ones that should change your plan.
Review: Не проверено
Блефуй в меня полностью! Идеальные карты для блефа в покере. #покер #poker #покеробучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
scare_card_definition
A scare card increases villain's STRONG hands (so he can value-bet more); classic ones are overcards (A/K/Q) and flush/straight completers.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: what a scare card is
Условие: Reading a board-changing card.
Обоснование автора: The defining feature is more value in villain's range, which is what makes a card 'scary'.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Scare cards: bluff or bluff-catch (3 questions + sizing tell)
-
classic_scare_card_not_always_scary_run_3_questions
Don't auto-fold or auto-bluff; run 3 questions before deciding.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: a classic scare card isn't always scary
Условие: A classic scare card (overcard/flush/straight) arrives.
Обоснование автора: Many 'classic' scare cards do not actually shift the value/bluff balance the way they appear to.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Scare cards: bluff or bluff-catch (3 questions + sizing tell)
-
q1_does_card_add_strong_hands_on_this_line
Q1: does the card give villain more strong hands ON THIS LINE? A cold-caller has few aces (he'd iso-raise AK/Ax), so an ace barely helps his range -> not scary.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: scare-card question 1
Условие: Deciding if a scare card actually helps villain.
Обоснование автора: If villain's line excludes the strong hands the card completes, the card is not scary.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Scare cards: bluff or bluff-catch (3 questions + sizing tell)
-
q2_does_he_keep_value_betting_and_bluff_more
Q2: will he keep value-betting his PREVIOUS strong hands? Scare cards often REMOVE value (he stops betting 2nd pairs/weak top pairs) while adding some, AND he bluffs them more -> the net value-combo change can be small/zero.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: scare-card question 2
Условие: Assessing the net value change a scare card causes.
Обоснование автора: A scare card both adds made hands and kills thin value, and invites more bluffs, often balancing or weakening his value.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Scare cards: bluff or bluff-catch (3 questions + sizing tell)
-
q3_sizing_tell_overbet_on_scare_card_is_bluff
Q3: would he bet THIS sizing with value, knowing it scares you? A polarizing overbet on a scare card is usually a bluff - thin value bets small to get called, not overbet (which folds out bluff-catchers).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: scare-card question 3 (sizing tell)
Условие: Villain overbets on a scare card.
Обоснование автора: Value wants calls (small size); an overbet on a scary card is built to fold you out, i.e. a bluff.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Scare cards: bluff or bluff-catch (3 questions + sizing tell)
-
bluffcatch_conclusion_scare_card
Call your bluff-catcher on the scare card: few value combos on the line plus an overbet sizing tell make it a profitable call.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: conclusion from the 3 questions
Условие: The 3 questions show few credible value combos + bluff-shaped sizing.
Обоснование автора: When the line lacks value and the sizing screams bluff, the scare card is fake -> call.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Scare cards: bluff or bluff-catch (3 questions + sizing tell)
-
exploit_bluff_scare_cards_vs_amateurs
You CAN bluff classic scare cards (overcards, flush cards) even with no value: amateurs fold 2nd/3rd pair to a scary card regardless of whether you can represent it. Vs pros they call.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: exploit: bluffing scare cards vs amateurs
Условие: Playing against amateurs who think in absolute hand strength.
Обоснование автора: Amateurs measure absolute strength and fold to scary cards; pros think in ranges and bluff-catch.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Scare cards: bluff or bluff-catch (3 questions + sizing tell)
-
concrete_tan_huan_kj_call_ace_overbet
Call: all three questions point to call (few aces on the line, no held-back value, bluff-shaped overbet). Tsang shows 83 (air).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: KJ top pair calls a river ace overbet
Условие: KJ top pair vs Tsang's river A overbet; Tsang cold-called pre (few aces), checked turn (no slowplay), overbet (bluff sizing).
Обоснование автора: The ace is a fake scare card on a cold-caller's checked line, and the overbet is a sizing tell of a bluff.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Scare cards: bluff or bluff-catch (3 questions + sizing tell)
Ученик творит дичь в покере. В чем причина? #покер #poker #покеробучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 10
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
all_mistakes_live_in_two_planes
Every poker mistake lives in one of two planes: (1) lacking a +EV strategy, or (2) misreading opponents' ranges. Self-scan which is weaker and work on it.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: all mistakes are in two planes
Условие: Diagnosing why you lose in poker.
Обоснование автора: Two root causes explain all leaks, so fixing them is where improvement comes from.
Review: Не проверено
-
plus_ev_strategy_definition
A +EV strategy = the order of actions that profits: which hands to open/3-bet/call pre and post, sizings, when to bet/call/fold. Without it you play -EV regardless of everything else.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: root cause 1: +EV strategy
Условие: You don't know the correct action in common spots.
Обоснование автора: You can't deviate correctly or read ranges usefully without a profitable baseline.
Review: Не проверено
-
how_to_get_plus_ev_strategy
Get it via flop charts/models (adapted to your limit), coaching, and theory (bet-or-not, which size). Fix preflop first, then postflop. Higher limits demand more complex strategies.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: how to build the strategy
Условие: Starting out or stuck at a limit.
Обоснование автора: A structured baseline is the prerequisite for everything above it.
Review: Не проверено
-
range_reading_is_the_variable
Strategy isn't fixed — it depends on the opponent's range, which varies by player/board/street. Misreading the range makes you play wrong despite a correct baseline. Range is the variable in every decision.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: root cause 2: reading ranges
Условие: Even with a good strategy you keep making errors.
Обоснование автора: The same +EV framework yields different actions against different real ranges.
Review: Не проверено
-
solver_trap_gto_vs_real_ranges
Solver gives the optimal strategy vs SOLVER ranges; real ranges differ, so copying solver lines misfires. Learn the recurring PATTERNS, not memorized charts, and adjust to reality.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the solver trap
Условие: Copying solver lines and finding your game breaks.
Обоснование автора: Optimal-vs-GTO is not optimal-vs-pool, so blind imitation loses.
Review: Не проверено
-
node_lock_real_ranges_to_solve
Input the REAL range (from experience/research/stats), lock it, and re-solve (node-lock). The answer differs hugely — where solver calls 50% vs a GTO range it folds 70-80% vs a real range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: node-lock the real range
Условие: You want the correct exploit vs a real pool.
Обоснование автора: A node-locked solve targets the actual pool, not an idealized opponent.
Review: Не проверено
-
range_reading_practice_hand_review
Review hands in software (watch showdowns, opponents' c-bet frequencies); best method: EVALUATE hands — assign the range yourself, then have a stronger player/coach correct your read. Assign-then-correct is the fastest range-reading trainer.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: practice: hand review
Условие: Improving your range-reading.
Обоснование автора: Being corrected on your own range reads builds accurate hand-reading fastest.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_flop_strategy_error_squeeze_KQ
3-bet-squeeze, don't flat: you steal the dead money, deny equity, and high rake makes the squeeze > call. Flatting KQo here is the strategy-plane mistake.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: strategy error (flop)
Условие: KQo in the BB, BTN opens, a weak reg calls.
Обоснование автора: Squeezing dead money out of position is higher-EV than a rake-taxed flat.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_range_error_call_overbet_flush
Fold: a reg's check-raise + overbet-jam on a flush board is ~95% nut flushes / straight flushes with ~3-5% bluff; the overbet needs >40% equity and Hero has ~5%. He mis-set the range (gave villain worse flushes/bluffs) and called -> the range-plane mistake.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: range error (river)
Условие: Hero's 2nd-nut flush faces a turn check-raise then a ~3x-pot overbet-jam from an unknown reg on a flush board.
Обоснование автора: Against an almost bluff-less nutted range the overbet-jam crushes a second-nut flush.
Review: Не проверено
-
range_read_flips_bet_call_fold
Same spot, different opponents: vs a reg with no bluffs -> bet/fold per your strategy; vs a hyper-bluffy maniac who over-jams -> call. The strategy gives the tools; the range read picks the action.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the range read flips the decision
Условие: Facing aggression with a marginal hand.
Обоснование автора: Strategy defines the options; the opponent's range decides which is +EV.
Review: Не проверено
Китаец в ужасе выкинул доезд туза на ривере в покере! Разбор паса на $300к #покер #poker Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 9
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
two_number_bluffcatch
Compare two numbers: pot odds (a constant by size — pot-bet -> 33%, half-pot -> 25%) vs your equity from counting combos. Equity above the constant -> call.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the two-number bluff-catch
Условие: Deciding call vs fold on the river.
Обоснование автора: A river call is +EV only when your win% beats the price the bet lays.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: River hero-fold frameworks (combos + discounting + 6 factors)
-
count_value_and_bluff_combos
Count villain's value vs bluff combos. Memorize: sets = 6 (3+3 across two ranks), two pair with your blockers reduced, pocket pairs = 6, unpaired = 16 (minus board blockers).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: count value vs bluff combos
Условие: Estimating equity in a narrow 3bp river spot.
Обоснование автора: A concrete combo count turns a river bluff-catch into arithmetic.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: River hero-fold frameworks (combos + discounting + 6 factors)
-
lots_of_value_is_a_fold_signal
If you count ~20 value combos on the river, that usually means FOLD — there's rarely enough bluff to justify a call. Don't call into a value-heavy pot-bet.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: lots of value = fold signal
Условие: You count many value combos in villain's betting range.
Обоснование автора: A range stacked with value beats a bluff-catcher regardless of price.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: River hero-fold frameworks (combos + discounting + 6 factors)
-
discount_value_combos_that_slowplay
DISCOUNT the value count for hands that would slow-play/check — especially vs an aggressive opponent who bluffs and thin-value-bets the scary card himself, so villain check-traps his sets/two pair. ~20 value can discount to ~10.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: discount value that would slow-play
Условие: Some of villain's value would play the scary card differently.
Обоснование автора: Value that checks isn't in the betting range, so raw counts overstate how far behind you are.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: River hero-fold frameworks (combos + discounting + 6 factors)
-
count_the_bluffs_wide_opener
Count missed broadways (KQ/KT/QT suited), busted backdoors (87s/67s), and busted Ax/Kx. A wide, deep 3bp opener has plenty of these to bluff a scary card.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: count the bluffs
Условие: Assessing how many bluffs a wide 3bp opener has.
Обоснование автора: A wide range that misses a lot supplies the bluffs that make a call profitable.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: River hero-fold frameworks (combos + discounting + 6 factors)
-
compare_discounted_equity_to_pot_odds
If your discounted equity (e.g. ~10 value vs plenty of bluffs at 33% pot-odds needing ~10) beats the constant -> CALL; otherwise fold. Borderline spots hinge entirely on the discount.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: compare discounted equity to pot odds
Условие: After discounting value and counting bluffs.
Обоснование автора: The discounted count, not the raw count, decides the marginal bluff-catch.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: River hero-fold frameworks (combos + discounting + 6 factors)
-
you_can_fold_river_improvements
A rivered improvement is NOT an auto-call — you can and often should fold it. Always count combos (value vs bluff, discounted) and compare to pot odds first.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: you can fold river improvements
Условие: You improve to a made hand on the river (a 'доезд') and face a big bet.
Обоснование автора: A new pair can still be far behind a value-heavy betting range.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: River hero-fold frameworks (combos + discounting + 6 factors)
-
concrete_tanhua_AQ_riverd_ace_call_slight_plus
~20 value discounts to ~10 (Yvon check-traps the scary ace vs an aggressive player who bluffs/thin-value-bets it), and there are plenty of bluffs -> the fold is defensible but a CALL is slightly +EV. Yvon showed KQ (a bluff), so the call wins.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Tan Hua AQ rivers an ace
Условие: Tan Hua AQ (rivered pair of aces) vs Yvon's pot-donk on the river in a 3bp.
Обоснование автора: Discounted value plus real bluffs push this borderline spot to a marginal call.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: River hero-fold frameworks (combos + discounting + 6 factors)
-
bonus_AQ_no_hit_turn_barrel
A turn 2nd-barrel is a decent line with AQ: it denies KQ/KT equity, folds out small pairs, and has live outs (an ace/queen). When to keep barreling two/three streets is a separate topic.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: bonus: AQ without hitting
Условие: AQ that missed the flop, on the turn.
Обоснование автора: Barreling denies live equity and folds out weak pairs while keeping outs.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
Вы не угадаете с чем я пихнул $1 миллион в покере! Разбор раздачи Патрика Антониуса #покер #poker Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 9
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
float_definition
A float = call the flop c-bet (usually with backdoors) intending to take the pot away with a bluff on later streets, using position. A deferred bluff, not a made-hand call.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: what a float is
Условие: Facing a flop c-bet in position with a weak hand + backdoors.
Обоснование автора: Calling now keeps the pot alive so position and later barrels can win it.
Review: Не проверено
-
float_hand_selection_two_backdoors_connected
Float hands with MORE than one backdoor (BDFD + backdoor gutshot/OESD) and CONNECTED cards (86s/98s/65s) that pick up OESD/gutshots on many turns. Don't float a bare backdoor FD like T4s — too few turns improve it.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: float hand selection
Условие: Choosing which hands to float.
Обоснование автора: Extra backdoors give more turns to barrel with real equity behind the bluff.
Review: Не проверено
-
float_needs_position_and_range_edge
Float IN POSITION (easier to realize equity and bluff). It works when you attack the aggressor's capped nut count — his iso-raise range has few suited 7x (few trips), while your flat range holds more 7x — so you can pressure his range on 7-heavy runouts.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: float needs position + a range edge
Условие: Deciding whether a float will work.
Обоснование автора: Position plus a nut-count edge is what lets the later barrels actually fold him out.
Review: Не проверено
-
value_owning_initial_vs_continuation_range
Don't confuse the initial range with the calling range: a strong line (bet 2-way flop + big turn + pot river) makes villain continue only with BETTER, so a big value bet with KK value-owns itself (~33% vs the calling range).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: value-owning: initial != continuation range
Условие: Value-betting a one-pair hand on a strong multi-street line.
Обоснование автора: If only better hands call your big bet, the bet loses money against what continues.
Review: Не проверено
-
fix_value_owning_check_or_small
Don't bet big — check or bet a much smaller size. On scary runouts especially, a large bet from a one-pair hand only folds out worse and gets called by better.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: fix value-owning: check or bet small
Условие: Villain only calls a big line with better hands.
Обоснование автора: A small bet or check avoids paying off the better hands your big bet isolates you against.
Review: Не проверено
-
sbvbb_oop_passive_three_questions
Play more passively (check / small / less often), not wide c-bets. Ask three questions before betting OOP: (1) who has more NUTS (e.g. trips, not overpairs)? (2) who has more range equity? (3) who realizes equity more easily (the IP player)?
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: SB-vs-BB OOP: three questions
Условие: Playing OOP (SB vs BB) as the aggressor, deciding bet vs check.
Обоснование автора: OOP with fewer nuts / worse realization, wide c-betting bleeds; the questions set the frequency.
Review: concept
-
fewer_nuts_or_worse_realization_check_more
Check more, size smaller, and bet less often. Wide OOP c-bets get floated and check-raised, and you get jammed on rivers and forced to fold even overpairs.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: fewer nuts / worse realization -> check more
Условие: You have fewer nutted combos, less equity, or worse realization OOP.
Обоснование автора: Betting into a range that floats/raises you and out-realizes you just builds pots you play badly.
Review: concept
-
concrete_antonius_float_bluff_HN_value_owns_KK
HN value-owns himself (Antonius's continuation range is trips/straights/boats/KQ+, KK ~33%). Antonius jams T4s — a float turned bluff exploiting HN's capped trips (no suited 7x in his iso range) + a tight image. HN tank-folds KK. The range dynamics carry the bluff; T4s was a slightly-too-weak float hand.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Antonius floats then jams T4s; HN value-owns KK
Условие: HN pot-bets KK on Q-7-7-x-4; Antonius (T4s, floated the flop) jams all-in.
Обоснование автора: A capped one-pair value bet plus your nut-count edge makes the river jam a profitable bluff.
Review: Не проверено
-
sbvbb_nut_count_by_texture
When your range lacks nutted combos on the texture (no suited 7x in your iso-open, so few trips), you have fewer nuts than usual -> check more / bet smaller. Solver even checks ~40% of KK on Q-7-7 SBvBB.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: SB-vs-BB nut count by texture
Условие: As the SB aggressor on a paired/high texture (e.g. Q-7-7).
Обоснование автора: A low nut count on the texture caps your betting range and invites floats/raises.
Review: Не проверено
Фил Айви заливает блефами в покере. Как умело блефовать? #poker #покер #покеробучение #philivey Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 9
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
bluff_math_required_vs_real_fold_equity
Compare required fold equity (a constant by size: 1/3->25%, 1/2->33%, 3/4->43%) with real fold equity (villain's fold frequency, e.g. fold-to-c-bet stat). Bluff is +EV when real > required.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the math of a profitable bluff
Условие: Deciding if a bluff is +EV.
Обоснование автора: Required FE = bet/(pot+bet); memorize it and compare to how often villain actually folds.
Review: trainer_ready
Кластер: When a pure bluff is profitable: required vs supplied fold frequency
-
cbet_ip_frequent_small_flop
C-bet frequently and small (1/3): wide ranges + a small bet fold out overcards/missed broadways/small pairs, so real FE 30-40% > required 25% -> auto-profit; c-bet ~70-80%.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: c-bet IP on the flop
Условие: In position on the flop in wide ranges.
Обоснование автора: On wide ranges a cheap bet clears its low required FE, printing automatically.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: C-bet strategy: frequency & sizing by street and position
-
cbet_less_often_bigger_turn
C-bet less often and bigger (3/4/pot/overbet): weak hands already folded, so you need a larger size to fold out 2nd/3rd pairs (and to value-bet bigger); c-bet ~45-50%.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: c-bet on the turn
Условие: Turn, after a flop c-bet, villain's range is condensed.
Обоснование автора: A condensed range requires more fold equity, so bigger sizing and lower frequency.
Review: needs_context
Кластер: C-bet strategy: frequency & sizing by street and position
-
dont_over_barrel_only_with_outs
Don't over-barrel: real FE drops and required FE rises each street, so barrel only hands with live outs (OESD/FD), not pure air; many later-street bluffs are near-zero EV.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: not over-barreling
Условие: Continuing to bluff on later streets.
Обоснование автора: Without fold equity or outs, extra barrels are -EV; equity is the backup.
Review: concept
Кластер: Which hands to bluff / bluff-raise: bottom-of-call + top-of-fold
-
river_bluffs_giveup_or_blocker_based
Until you learn blocker-based selection, give up (low FE vs a strong continuation range). Advanced: bluff hands that BLOCK villain's calls and DON'T block his folds (don't bluff a busted flush draw - it blocks his folds).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: river bluff selection
Условие: Considering a river bluff.
Обоснование автора: River continuation ranges are strong; blockers to value (not to folds) make the rare profitable bluffs.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: Which hands to bluff / bluff-raise: bottom-of-call + top-of-fold
-
cbet_oop_less_frequent_more_polar
C-bet less often and more polar than IP: OOP your real FE is lower (villain continues wider, can float and bluff-raise, you realize medium hands worse).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: c-bet OOP
Условие: Out of position as the aggressor.
Обоснование автора: In position villain folds more and you realize equity cheaply; OOP neither holds, so bet less.
Review: trainer_candidate
Кластер: C-bet strategy: frequency & sizing by street and position
-
exception_3bp_texture_cbet_wide_oop
You can c-bet wide even OOP: as the 3-bettor with range/nut advantage on a board the caller can't hit, even air c-bets (hence Ivey c-betting J9 on K-K-3).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: exception: 3-bet-pot textures you smash
Условие: 3-bet pot OOP on a texture that misses the caller's range (e.g. K-K-3).
Обоснование автора: Range/nut advantage + a board that misses the caller gives high real FE even OOP.
Review: needs_context
Кластер: C-bet strategy: frequency & sizing by street and position
-
main_rule_of_bluffs_more_value_more_bluffs
The more strong hands you have, the more bluffs you can add; 3-bet pots give the aggressor more strong hands -> more bluffs.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the main rule of bluffs
Условие: Deciding how many bluffs to add to a line.
Обоснование автора: Bluff frequency is balanced against value; more value supports more bluffs.
Review: concept
Кластер: C-bet strategy: frequency & sizing by street and position
-
concrete_ivey_j9_cbet_then_giveup
The flop c-bet is correct (range/nut advantage), the turn barrel is near-zero EV (marginal), and the river give-up is correct.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Ivey J9 air c-bets K-K-3 then gives up
Условие: J9 air in a 3-bet pot on K-K-3: c-bet flop, barrel turn (flush completes), give up river.
Обоснование автора: High flop FE justifies the air c-bet; FE collapses by the river, so give up.
Review: needs_context
Кластер: C-bet strategy: frequency & sizing by street and position
Фил Айви переиграл азиатов по динамике в покере! Разбор раздачи на 100к #poker #покер #покеробучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
dont_adjust_to_dynamics_vs_unknowns
Do NOT change your game: they aren't targeting you, the cards just came. Reacting (looser 3-bets, spite 4-bets, over-c-betting) is a gross -EV mistake.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: don't play by dynamics vs unknowns
Условие: An unknown opponent 3-bets/c-bets you a few times over a small sample (50-150 hands).
Обоснование автора: At 50-150 hands you have no real information; perceived 'dynamics' is variance, not adjustment.
Review: Не проверено
-
valid_deviation_real_stats_large_sample
Deviate only on established tendencies (e.g. 3-bet 20%, c-bet 85%) — that's how they play vs EVERYONE, not vs you. Adjust your standard lines to those population/player tendencies.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: valid deviation 1: real stats
Условие: You have HUD stats over a large sample (300-1000+ hands).
Обоснование автора: A tendency visible over a real sample is a genuine, exploitable pattern.
Review: Не проверено
-
small_sample_stats_are_noise
Ignore it — with no sample behind the number it's noise; don't change your play off a stat without enough observations.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: small-sample stats are noise
Условие: A HUD stat is built on very few observations (e.g. 3-bet 20% off 3 samples).
Обоснование автора: A percentage from 3 events carries no predictive weight.
Review: Не проверено
-
valid_deviation_versus_hero_exploit
Counter-adjust only when a Versus-Hero stat over a HUGE sample (tens of thousands) or heavy live experience shows he plays markedly differently vs YOU than vs others. This is rare — most multi-tabling regs don't track you.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: valid deviation 2: someone exploiting your leaks
Условие: A specific opponent may be targeting your leaks (you over-fold to 3-bets/c-bets/rivers).
Обоснование автора: Real personal targeting is rare and only provable over an enormous sample.
Review: Не проверено
-
need_showdowns_not_just_actions
You can't decide off 2-3 hands with no showdown — without seeing which cards he played those lines with, there's no information to act on.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: you need showdowns to read
Условие: Trying to read an opponent from a couple of aggressive hands with no showdown.
Обоснование автора: Actions without shown cards don't reveal the range behind them.
Review: Не проверено
-
live_offline_dynamics_do_matter
Live, dynamics and image DO matter (small samples, repeated interaction, reads). You can use your image — but this is built over a long session, never over 2-3 hands.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: live is the exception
Условие: Playing live/offline with repeated interaction and a table image.
Обоснование автора: Live repetition and reads give the information that online small samples lack.
Review: Не проверено
-
dont_copy_highstakes_shoves
Don't imitate it online/short-sample — most such shoves (e.g. jamming A6s) are -EV without the image, reads and history that justified them at the table.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: don't copy high-stakes shoves
Условие: Tempted to copy a flashy dynamic shove seen on a high-stakes stream.
Обоснование автора: The play's EV came from a specific live context you don't have.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_ivey_timed_shove_justified
Correct here: a long live session gave him image + reads; the shove had fold equity, ~30-33% live equity when called, and folded out many stronger hands (Tan Hua squeeze-folds AT/A8/77). The context — not 'dynamics' alone — made it +EV.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Ivey's shove was justified by context
Условие: Ivey jams (~A6s) in a long live session vs the Asian players.
Обоснование автора: Fold equity plus real backup equity plus folding out better hands is what justified the jam.
Review: Не проверено
Как побеждать агрессивных игроков в покере? Тони Джи и блеф на $2 000 000 #poker #покер Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
finished_bluff_lines_define_the_plan
Assume he carries bluffs to the river (bet flop, turn AND river) — don't expect a bet-flop-then-check. Plan your whole hand around the finished bluff line.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: aggressive maniacs play finished bluff lines
Условие: Facing a hyper-aggressive opponent who barrels flop-turn-river.
Обоснование автора: Maniacs finish their bluffs, so partial reads that assume they give up are wrong.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Beating hyper-aggressive opponents (finished bluff lines)
-
fold_more_not_call_more_vs_big_barrels
Fold MORE: big sizings give worse pot odds and you reach showdown less (blown off on turn/river). Fold your habitual marginal calls (3rd pair, 2nd pair, A-high, gutshot) right on the flop instead of calling.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: fold more, not call more
Условие: Facing big barrels (pot bet / overbet, not half-pot) from an aggressive opponent.
Обоснование автора: Against large multi-street aggression, thin calls are -EV over distance.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Beating hyper-aggressive opponents (finished bluff lines)
-
decide_on_flop_call_all_three_streets
Decide on the flop whether you'll call flop-turn-river (even on scare cards — overcards, flush completes). If not ready to call down, FOLD on the flop. No intermediate calls (call flop, fold turn) — that's burning money.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: decide on the flop: call down or fold
Условие: Holding a made hand vs a finished-bluff-line opponent.
Обоснование автора: Maniacs barrel every street, so a call that can't continue is a guaranteed leak.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Beating hyper-aggressive opponents (finished bluff lines)
-
turn_calldown_incapable_hands_into_bluffs
Instead of a passive call, turn them into bluffs — e.g. check-raise the flop (as Tan Hua did). Fold on the flop OR raise; don't float passively.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: alternative: bluff instead of passive call
Условие: Hands you used to call (gutshot, OESD, 3rd pair) that can't call down.
Обоснование автора: A bluff-raise pressures the maniac where a passive call just bleeds chips.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Beating hyper-aggressive opponents (finished bluff lines)
-
preflop_tighten_dont_widen
Remove the bottom of your opening range (weak suited connectors / offsuit you can't defend vs a 3-bet) — don't keep opening them. Widening to 'fight back' is putting out a fire with gasoline.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: preflop: tighten, don't widen
Условие: A wide 3-bettor (25-30%) keeps 3-betting your opens.
Обоснование автора: Opening hands you must fold to a 3-bet just donates; narrowing removes the leak.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Beating hyper-aggressive opponents (finished bluff lines)
-
bluff_4bet_or_bluff_raise_from_range_bottom
From the bottom of your range, occasionally bluff-4bet (prefer blockers like Tx) preflop, or bluff-raise postflop. The counter to aggression is selective aggression, never wider calls.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: aggression from the bottom of your range
Условие: vs someone who 3-bets wide but folds to 4-bets, or barrels wide.
Обоснование автора: Turning weak hands into aggression exploits a wide-3bet/fold-to-4bet tendency.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Beating hyper-aggressive opponents (finished bluff lines)
-
never_ego_call_maniacs
Don't: maniacs still make strong hands sometimes, so ego-calling wider -> tilt and losses. The whole counter is fold more + narrow ranges + occasional aggression, NEVER a wider calling range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: never ego-call maniacs
Условие: Tempted to call wider to 'punish' a maniac who bluffed you.
Обоснование автора: Wider calls run into the maniac's real value and compound variance into tilt.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Beating hyper-aggressive opponents (finished bluff lines)
-
concrete_tonyg_j8s_jam_maniac_vs_maniac
Maniac vs maniac: Tan Hua folds K-high (the better hand). It illustrates finished bluff lines and fold equity between aggressors — but it's a spew template to defend against, not to copy.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Tony G jams J8s (bare J-high FD)
Условие: Tony G with a bare non-nut (J-high) flush draw jams >$1M into a $2.1M pot vs Tan Hua.
Обоснование автора: The jam only worked via fold equity vs another maniac; the lesson is the defensive framework.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Beating hyper-aggressive opponents (finished bluff lines)
Когда выгодно играть донк-бетами в покере? Блеф Роба Янга на $100к #poker #покер #покеробучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 9
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
donk_bet_definition
A donk-bet (lead / 'donkey bet') = betting out of turn after a passive action (called a flop c-bet OOP, or check-called). It's derided because you're OOP with a usually weaker range while the aggressor holds the strong hands.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: what a donk-bet is
Условие: You were the passive caller on the prior street, OOP.
Обоснование автора: By default the OOP caller checks; donking deviates from that and needs justification.
Review: Не проверено
-
weigh_bet_vs_check
Weigh the two: CHECK is better when a check gets a bet from many worse hands (then check-raise/check-call a strong hand); DONK is better when you won't get a bet from worse AND you'd miss value (worse hands that fold to nothing but call a donk, or draw out for free).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: weigh value of betting vs checking
Условие: Deciding donk vs check as the OOP caller.
Обоснование автора: The donk only wins when checking forfeits value the bet would capture.
Review: Не проверено
-
default_check_strong_hands_oop
Usually CHECK (not donk): modern IP players c-bet frequently, so a check gets a bet from their junk that you then check-raise/check-call. A donk forfeits that continuation-bet value. Also your medium/weak hands prefer a cheap check-call to realize equity.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: default: check strong hands OOP
Условие: A strong hand OOP vs an aggressor who c-bets a lot.
Обоснование автора: Betting into a range that would have bet its air just loses the bluffs' money.
Review: Не проверено
-
donk_flop_multiway_low_cbet
Donk for value when you won't get a c-bet from worse: (1) MULTIWAY pots (c-bet drops to ~40-45% 3-way vs 70-75% HU); (2) vs low-c-bet/passive opponents (~40-50%) who check back air/draws/weak pairs. Checking would miss value / give free cards.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: donk the flop: multiway / low c-bet
Условие: Flop, you hold a strong hand, and the aggressor rarely c-bets here.
Обоснование автора: When the aggressor checks back a lot, leading is the only way to charge his worse hands.
Review: Не проверено
-
donk_scare_card_vs_non_bluffer
Donk when the card frightens him so he won't bet his overpairs/top pairs (fears you hit + fears the card himself) and would check behind. Condition: he must NOT be bluffy (a straightforward reg) — don't hand him a free check-behind.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: donk scare cards vs a non-bluffer
Условие: A turn/river scare card (flush/straight completes) that frightens the aggressor.
Обоснование автора: A scared, non-bluffing aggressor checks back, so leading captures value and denies the free card.
Review: Не проверено
-
donk_blank_vs_nitty_barreler
Donk for value: nitty opponents stop betting TP-medium-kicker/2nd pairs on the river and won't pay a check-raise with them, so a check misses their value. Lead to extract from their medium hands.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: donk blanks vs a nitty barreler
Условие: A blank river vs a nit who barreled flop/turn with medium hands but won't 3rd-barrel or call a check-raise.
Обоснование автора: A nit checks back medium hands and folds them to a raise, so only a lead gets paid.
Review: Не проверено
-
donk_default_is_low_ev_oop_weak_range
Default to NOT donking: as the preflop caller you have a weaker, capped range (no AA/KK/QQ) and play OOP, so leading is usually -EV. Donk only in the specific spots above.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: donk-bets are usually low-EV
Условие: Considering a donk-bet without a specific reason.
Обоснование автора: A weak OOP range makes an unexplained lead a leak, not a play.
Review: Не проверено
-
donk_bluff_needs_undominated_equity
Pick bluffs that block value and have CLEAN, undominated outs. Avoid donk-bluffing draws whose completions are dominated (a lower flush/straight) — deep-stacked, hitting into a bigger hand is catastrophic.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: donk-bluffs need clean equity
Условие: Choosing a hand to donk-bluff, especially deep.
Обоснование автора: A dominated draw loses a huge pot when it 'hits', so it's a poor deep-stack bluff.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_rob_young_97s_donk_bluff_marginal
It won (Andy folds AA), but the turn donk with 97s is marginal: the line is capped vs lots of value, and 97s has DOMINATED outs (a completed flush/straight loses to bigger). A donk with sets/two pair/straights (undominated) is the better value+bluff mix.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Rob Young's 97s donk-bluff
Условие: Rob Young check-calls flop, donks turn Q and jams river J with 97s (busted FD/gutshot) vs Andy's AA.
Обоснование автора: Winning once doesn't validate a bluff with dominated equity in deep stacks.
Review: Не проверено
Как играть спектрами в покере? Тони Джи +$200к за 1 раздачу #poker #покер #покеробучение #coinpoker Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 12
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
range_definition_think_in_ranges
A range/spectrum = the group of hands an opponent plays in a spot. Don't guess the exact hand — model the whole range and narrow it by his actions street to street. (Even AK is 16 combos; each pair 6.)
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: what a range is
Условие: Reading an opponent in an incomplete-information spot.
Обоснование автора: Poker is a game of incomplete information; ranges, not single hands, are decidable.
Review: Не проверено
-
bottom_of_range_definition
The bottom of range = the weakest hand played in the spot (e.g. '2nd pair+' means 2nd pair and everything stronger). It exists for each street/action (open, c-bet, call, 2nd barrel). Knowing the bottom IS thinking in ranges.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the bottom of a range
Условие: Defining a range in a spot.
Обоснование автора: The bottom anchors the whole range and every continue/fold decision.
Review: Не проверено
-
range_departure_definition_minus_ev
Range departure = playing hands weaker than the bottom (call 3rd pair when the bottom is 2nd pair; open 42o UTG). It's -EV over distance — a losing action even when it occasionally wins a big pot.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: going beyond your range
Условие: Playing hands weaker than the bottom of range.
Обоснование автора: Hands below the bottom lose money on average regardless of one lucky outcome.
Review: Не проверено
-
two_ways_to_depart_range
Either (a) UNCONSCIOUSLY / by mistake — you don't know the correct ranges (no solver study) and open/call too wide; this is most common and loses money; or (b) DELIBERATELY — valid only to exploit a known leak.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: two ways people depart their range
Условие: Diagnosing why someone plays too wide.
Обоснование автора: Most departures are accidental leaks; only informed ones can be +EV.
Review: Не проверено
-
deliberate_departure_to_exploit_leak
Depart deliberately only to exploit it: fold-to-steal 70% -> open 100% from SB; folds 60% to c-bet -> c-bet 100%. This requires knowing the average/bottom FIRST, then the specific leak.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: deliberate departure = exploit
Условие: You've identified a specific opponent leak.
Обоснование автора: Exploitative widening is +EV precisely because it targets a known weakness.
Review: Не проверено
-
learn_average_ranges_first
Learn the average continuation ranges first so you don't depart by accident. Two ways to derive the bottom: the SOLVER approach (charts) or the EXPLOIT approach (opponents' c-bet frequencies via experience/coaching).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: prerequisite: learn the averages
Условие: Starting out / building range discipline.
Обоснование автора: You can't deviate correctly from a baseline you don't know.
Review: Не проверено
-
bottom_narrows_each_street
The flop c-bet range is wide (33%, ~80-100%) but the turn 2nd barrel is narrow and strong (bigger size ~60%). So your calling range must TIGHTEN each street as his range strengthens.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the bottom narrows street by street
Условие: Facing later-street aggression after calling the flop.
Обоснование автора: A stronger barreling range on later streets demands more equity to continue.
Review: Не проверено
-
baseline_flop_call_3bp
Call 3rd pair+; unmade hands with >=4 outs (gutshot+, OESD, FD, combo draws); A-high with backdoors/showdown value (A4s w/ bdfd, KQ w/ bd fd+sd). Any real pair connection continues.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: baseline flop calling range (3bp, cash 6-max)
Условие: BTN calling a small (~1/3) c-bet in a 3-bet pot at low limits.
Обоснование автора: A wide c-bet lets you defend any pair or live draw profitably.
Review: Не проверено
-
baseline_turn_call_3bp
Tighten: call only 2nd pair GOOD kicker+ (e.g. AT/KT on QTx), pairs with a draw (2nd pair + FD/OESD), and unmade only OESD+ (8 outs). Fold weaker; no more gutshots.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: baseline turn calling range (facing 2nd barrel)
Условие: Facing a ~60% 2nd barrel in a 3bp.
Обоснование автора: A narrow strong barrel range requires a stronger continue range.
Review: Не проверено
-
baseline_river_call_3bp_very_tight
Call very tight: top pair STRONG kicker+, often only two pair+. No 2nd/3rd pairs or medium-kicker pairs. Loosen (call TP weak kicker / 2nd pair) ONLY vs aggressive opponents who go beyond their range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: baseline river calling range (facing a jam)
Условие: Facing a river jam in a 3-bet pot.
Обоснование автора: Deep 3bp river ranges are strong, so only premium bluff-catchers call profitably.
Review: Не проверено
-
low_limit_overfold_adjustment
Overfold: even KQ (top pair weak kicker) calls poorly on some boards (25% pot odds); call top pairs only with strong kickers. Reform habitual thin bluff-catches downward at low stakes.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: low-limit adjustment
Условие: Playing low limits (NL10-NL50) where pools are tighter/less bluffy.
Обоснование автора: Low-limit pools under-bluff, so marginal calls that work at high stakes lose here.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_both_players_departed_range
Both departed: Tony G's flop 77 call is too weak vs a broadway-heavy 3bp range (he got lucky, hit a set, won $200k); Tan Hua's turn 2nd barrel with TT can't value-bet or bluff and was punished. Tony G's loose departures cost him $1.7M on the series. Result-oriented luck != correct play.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: both players went beyond range
Условие: Tony G calls 77 on K-J-2 (3bp), turn 7 gives a set; Tan Hua 2nd-barrels TT.
Обоснование автора: One lucky set doesn't make a -EV call correct; departures bleed money over distance.
Review: Не проверено
Как скрыть силу своих карт в покере? Ошибка Джанглмена на $150к #poker #покер #обучениепокер Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
no_information_bets
Never bet purely for information — it's a gross mistake. Information is a byproduct of any bet, never its reason.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: there are no information bets
Условие: Tempted to bet just to see where you stand.
Обоснование автора: Every bet already yields information; the reason to bet must be value, protection/semibluff, or equity realization.
Review: Не проверено
-
three_legit_reasons_to_bet
Bet only for: (1) VALUE (ahead of villain's calling range, want a call/raise from worse); (2) SEMIBLUFF/PROTECTION (fold out better hands or deny/steal his equity — can be a weak made hand denying equity); (3) to REALIZE your own equity in bloated pots.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the only reasons to bet
Условие: Deciding whether a bet is justified.
Обоснование автора: A bet with none of these purposes is an information bet — a leak.
Review: Не проверено
-
medium_hand_srp_baseline_check_call
Baseline is check / check-call (sometimes from the flop): you can't value bet (worse folds, better calls) and there's little equity to deny.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: medium hand in a single-raised pot
Условие: Top pair weak kicker in a single-raised pot: no value vs villain's continuing range, few outs to deny.
Обоснование автора: With no value and nothing to protect, betting only isolates you against better.
Review: Не проверено
-
fourbet_pots_prefer_small_bet
Prefer a small bet over checking: a cheap bet denies even a little equity, realizes your own equity better, and keeps you unreadable.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: 4-bet pots change the default
Условие: 4-bet pot: bloated pot, tiny sizings (1/4-1/3 flop, 1/4 turn).
Обоснование автора: In bloated 4bp the tiny bet buys equity denial + realization + disguise at low cost.
Review: Не проверено
-
fourbet_bet_decision_rule_would_i_checkcall
Ask: would I check-call a small (~1/4 pot) bet? If yes, DON'T check-call — bet small yourself, especially if you were the pre/flop aggressor. Only check-call if you'd genuinely fold to the small bet.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: the check-call test
Условие: Borderline hand (K6/AQ) in a 4bp, deciding bet vs check.
Обоснование автора: Check-calling surrenders initiative and reveals weakness; betting keeps the lead.
Review: Не проверено
-
stay_unreadable_merged_small_bet
Bet strong hands (AK/AA/KK/QQ) small too, so a small bet doesn't reveal weakness (a merged range). Check-calling caps you and lets an IP opponent run you over (he picks when to overbet/value-bet you).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: don't cap your range
Условие: You'd check-call a medium hand, capping your checking range.
Обоснование автора: A merged small bet hides strength; a capped checking range is exploitable in position.
Review: Не проверено
-
equity_realization_oop_small_bet
OOP you realize equity worse; a small bet helps drag your hand to showdown and realize its equity while denying villain's, instead of ceding control by checking.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: realizing equity out of position
Условие: OOP with a medium hand that wants to see showdown.
Обоснование автора: Betting keeps initiative and improves realization from out of position.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_jungleman_k6_should_small_bet_turn
He checked then check-called instead of small-betting the turn — capping his range and creating a brutal river fold (tank-folded a bluff-catcher). A small turn bet was better.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Jungleman K6 turn check-call caps range
Условие: 4bp OOP, K6 (turned TP weak kicker on a K), was the 4-bettor/flop aggressor.
Обоснование автора: Check-calling surrendered initiative and readability, forcing the tough river spot.
Review: Не проверено
Как манипулировать оппонентом в покере? Разбор раздачи на $600 000 с Тритон Покер! #покер #poker Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 10
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
crying_call_definition
A crying call = a call forced by pot odds while you're behind most of the time. It signals the line/sizing was wrong; avoid getting into it.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: what a crying call is
Условие: You bet a strong non-nut hand and get check-jammed with a small stack behind.
Обоснование автора: Being priced in to call a jam you're usually behind to is a symptom of undercollection.
Review: Не проверено
-
jam_yourself_to_avoid_crying_calls
Jam yourself rather than a bet that leaves money behind: otherwise villain calls when worse (you undercollect) and jams when better (crying call, full pay). Jamming stops the big undercollection over distance.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: jam instead of underbetting
Условие: Value hand ahead of villain's continuing range, villain has a smallish stack behind.
Обоснование автора: Leaving a stack behind lets villain pay light and punish heavy; jamming collects max when ahead.
Review: Не проверено
-
value_owning_definition
Value-owning = a bet where MORE combos beat you than lose to you (equity <50% vs the calling range) — you value-bet yourself, not villain. A value bet needs >50%, ideally 60-70%, equity vs what calls.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: value-owning yourself
Условие: Considering a 'value' bet in a big pot with narrow ranges.
Обоснование автора: If more calling combos beat you, the bet loses money against the very range that continues.
Review: Не проверено
-
count_combos_before_value_betting
Before betting, count villain's stronger vs weaker combos in his continuation range; if stronger >= weaker, there's no value bet — check.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: check for value by counting combos
Условие: Deciding whether a river bet has value in a narrow-range spot.
Обоснование автора: A concrete combo count replaces the vague feeling that 'he has worse'.
Review: Не проверено
-
combinatorics_method
Use combinatorics: an unpaired holding = 16 combos (minus blockers/removals and hands that would've played differently); sets/full houses come from board pairs. Estimate the range concretely, not on autopilot.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: how to count combos
Условие: Estimating villain's range in a big pot with narrow ranges.
Обоснование автора: Counting combos turns hand-reading into arithmetic you can trust in high-variance spots.
Review: Не проверено
-
giant_sizings_vs_narrow_strong_range
Use giant sizings (overbet, 1.5x, 2x pot, overbet-jam): bigger is almost always better; prefer 2x overbet / overbet-jam because everything reads strong anyway and you earn far more per call.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: giant sizings
Условие: Villain's continuation range is narrow and strong (a hobby player calls top pair+).
Обоснование автора: A strong sticky range pays big bets at nearly the same frequency, so size up for value.
Review: Не проверено
-
medium_sizings_default_prefer_three_quarters
Use medium sizings (1/2-3/4 pot) as default; lean to 3/4 — 2/3 vs 3/4 barely differ in call frequency, but 3/4 earns more per call.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: medium sizings
Условие: A standard value spot without an extreme range read.
Обоснование автора: Call frequency is nearly flat across 2/3-3/4, so pick the larger for more value.
Review: Не проверено
-
mini_sizings_manipulate_range
Use mini sizings (1/3-1/5 pot, even 1bb): (a) shrink the size to WIDEN villain's continuation range and turn a no-value spot into thin value (he calls AQ/AJ/AK he'd fold to a jam); (b) when his range is too weak/capped to pay any real size, a micro bet still earns something vs nothing.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: mini sizings to manipulate the range
Условие: A big bet won't get called by enough worse hands, or villain's range is too weak to pay.
Обоснование автора: Lowering the price recruits worse hands; a tiny bet beats checking a range that pays nothing big.
Review: Не проверено
-
burn_river_time_bank_for_sizing
Burn time-bank on the river: the pot is huge, so a 20-30% change in sizing (or picking overbet vs mini) hugely affects your winrate. Top players always tank the river to choose the optimal size.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: tank the river to choose sizing
Условие: Facing a large river pot online.
Обоснование автора: At big pots the marginal dollars from correct sizing dominate your winrate.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_tsang_underbet_crying_call
Elizabeth check-jams quad tens; Tsang crying-calls and loses. He should have counted combos (~19 stronger vs ~10 weaker -> no value, value-owning) and either checked or mini-bet ~40k to get called by AQ/AJ/AK.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Tsang threes-full underbets and crying-calls
Условие: SRP, 33 -> threes full on A-K-10-3-10; Tsang underbets 215k into 213k leaving 270k behind.
Обоснование автора: The underbet both value-owned him and forced the crying call against a stronger range.
Review: Не проверено
Как уворачиваться от куллеров в покере? Банк на $900k с Тритон покера #poker #покер #покеробучение Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
dodge_cooler_compare_two_numbers
Compare two numbers: pot odds (a CONSTANT by bet size — 2/3 pot = 27%, 1/2 pot = 25%) vs your equity (how often you win). If equity < pot odds, fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: dodging coolers = compare two numbers
Условие: Facing a big bet with an overpair in a narrow-range spot.
Обоснование автора: A call is only +EV when your win% exceeds the price the bet lays.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Dodging coolers via combinatorics
-
compute_equity_via_combinatorics
Count the combos you beat vs total in villain's range. E.g. 10 combos, 5 you beat -> 50% equity; 3 you beat -> 30%. Narrow 3bp/4bp ranges are countable by hand.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: get equity by counting combos
Условие: Estimating your equity in a narrow-range spot.
Обоснование автора: In tight ranges a combo count is a fast, reliable equity estimate.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Dodging coolers via combinatorics
-
combinatorics_primer_counts
Any unpaired hand = 16 combos (4x4); a board card removes combos (top pair with one on board = 12); any pocket pair = 6; trips from board pairs scale similarly. Memorize these.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: combinatorics counts to memorize
Условие: Counting an opponent's combos.
Обоснование автора: Fixed combo counts turn hand-reading into quick arithmetic.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Dodging coolers via combinatorics
-
take_a_margin_dont_call_razor_edge
Don't call at the razor's edge — you may miscount live. Require equity comfortably above pot odds; call only with a buffer, fold when it's a thin -EV or borderline.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: take a margin
Условие: Your counted equity is very close to the pot-odds threshold.
Обоснование автора: Live counting error means marginal calls are worse than they look.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Dodging coolers via combinatorics
-
narrow_range_value_skews_stronger
Expect a strong betting range: KK/AA/QQ + best flush draws, few bluffs (more so multiway). Count and you'll usually find more stronger combos than worse ones -> fold overpairs like QQ.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: narrow ranges skew to value
Условие: A 4-bet/3-bet pot, especially with 2+ opponents, facing a jam.
Обоснование автора: Deep 4bp jams multiway are value-heavy, so overpairs are usually behind.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Dodging coolers via combinatorics
-
wider_spots_call_position_matters
Don't auto-fold: a wider range (TT/JJ, broadways, many FDs) gives your overpair enough equity to call. Position and range width decide — count for the specific spot.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: wider spots can call
Условие: A wider 4bp (online BTN vs SB 3bet vs BB cold-4bet ~6%, small c-bet, turn jam).
Обоснование автора: A wide, draw-heavy 4-bet range flips the combo count in your favor.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Dodging coolers via combinatorics
-
exercise_count_combos_on_river_first
Practice on the RIVER first (narrow, tractable ranges); for wide flop/turn ranges use equilab/coach. E.g. 3bp river: his value KK/AA/QQ (18) + top pair (12) = 30 beat you vs your ~10 -> fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: practice combos on the river
Условие: Learning to count combos.
Обоснование автора: River ranges are narrow enough that hand counting is accurate and teaches range thinking.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Dodging coolers via combinatorics
-
concrete_elizabeth_should_fold_QQ
Fold: KK+AA = 12 combos beat her; only ~3 worse (AK/AQ with the flush ace, low-freq) which also have big equity. QQ equity ~25% < 27% pot odds -> -EV. She called and lost $250k.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Elizabeth should fold QQ
Условие: QQ overpair on 6-6-3+FD vs Wong's 4-bet-then-jam (KK); turn 7, jam 260k into 376k (~27% pot odds).
Обоснование автора: More stronger combos than worse, with worse hands still holding equity, makes the call -EV.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Dodging coolers via combinatorics
Ошибка в покере ценой в машину!? $20к проиграл Миша Иннер за 1 раздачу #poker #покер #иннер Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 10
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
tighten_opens_vs_hobby_player_behind
Remove your weakest opens (e.g. 33 UTG): a caller behind means you play OOP with worse equity realization (check-fold flops/turns). Drop the bottom of your opening range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: tighten opens vs a hobby player behind
Условие: A hobby player sits directly behind you (will cold-call your open).
Обоснование автора: A hobby caller taxes your equity realization, making marginal opens -EV.
Review: Не проверено
-
tighten_opens_vs_aggressive_squeezers
Tighten further: the threat of 3-bet-squeezes makes your weakest opens unprofitable (you can't defend them). Combined with a hobby caller behind, fold hands like 33 UTG.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: tighten opens vs squeezers behind
Условие: Aggressive 3-bet-squeezers sit behind you (esp. with a hobby caller in between).
Обоснование автора: Hands you must fold to a squeeze donate when opened into aggression.
Review: Не проверено
-
low_limit_cbet_merge_hands
C-bet (don't solver-check): at low limits nobody punishes your capped range, and a c-bet denies equity to KT/QT/JT/Ax while you keep backup. Solver checks these merges, but that's for high-stakes range protection.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: c-bet merge hands at low limits
Условие: Small pair / gutshot (33, AK) on a dry flop at low limits.
Обоснование автора: A capped-range check only matters vs opponents who attack it, which low limits don't.
Review: Не проверено
-
low_limit_raise_sets_for_value
Raise 100% for value — don't flat to 'protect your checking range'. At low limits nobody attacks capped ranges; FDs/88x/67 pay the raise. Flatting is a GTO affectation that leaves a weak, unprotected checking range and invites river overbets.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: raise sets for value at low limits
Условие: You turn a set and face a bet at low limits.
Обоснование автора: Straightforward value-raising prints where range protection has no opponent to defend against.
Review: Не проверено
-
dont_invent_protection_on_oneoff_shots
Play straightforwardly — don't build elaborate range protection for future streets against an opponent you won't play long. If you have a value raise, take it.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: don't invent protection on shots
Условие: Playing a one-off higher-limit shot vs a fish.
Обоснование автора: Range protection only pays off over repeated play against attentive opponents.
Review: Не проверено
-
tiny_block_bet_is_thin_value
It's a thin value block-bet, not a bluff: he milks your Ax/AK/AQ. A min-bet holds little bluff (regs bluff bigger to get folds) and may induce a bluff-raise. Don't blow it up light.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: read the tiny block-bet
Условие: Villain min-bets ~1/10 pot on the river into your capped range.
Обоснование автора: Tiny sizings are value-milking against a capped range, not fold-seeking bluffs.
Review: Не проверено
-
count_value_before_calling_overbet_jam
Count combos: value (A4, 67, 88/99 sets, 55) is huge (~16+), bluffs tiny. When facing a river jam, the count of hands you DON'T beat drives the fold — lots of value here -> fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: count value before calling the jam
Условие: Your raise of the block-bet gets overbet-jammed.
Обоснование автора: A value-heavy jamming range makes the bluff-catch -EV.
Review: Не проверено
-
unusual_expensive_line_skews_value
His range skews to VALUE: a min-bet-then-jam is atypical and expensive, and multi-tabling regs don't invent complex costly bluffs. Combined with lots of value in the line -> fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: unusual + expensive line = value
Условие: Villain uses a strange, costly river line (min-bet then overbet-jam).
Обоснование автора: Strange + costly lines are value-heavy because bluffs prefer cheap, simple execution.
Review: Не проверено
-
your_capped_line_lets_villain_jam_cheap
Villain jams cheaply because YOUR line is capped: checking the flop means you hold no 5x/8x/9x/67/A2 (those c-bet), so you can't have the nuts and he can shove sets fearlessly. Fast-playing earlier avoids this.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: your capped line invites the jam
Условие: You checked the flop and raised the turn, capping yourself out of the semibluff hands.
Обоснование автора: A capped line advertises no nuts, so villain value-jams without risk.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_inner_should_fold_preflop_and_river
Fold preflop (tighten the open) OR fold the river 33 to the jam (value-heavy unusual line, his line reps 55/89/sets; Inner's capped line lets him jam). Lost $20k to a set of 5s — a preflop + range-read double leak.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Inner should fold pre and river
Условие: Inner opens 33 UTG (hobby caller + squeezers behind); flops set on 5-2-8 line; river faces a block-bet-then-overbet-jam.
Обоснование автора: The open was -EV and the river call runs into a value-heavy jam over a capped line.
Review: Не проверено
Как НЕЛЬЗЯ играть на микро-лимитах в покере? Банк Иннера с $20k #poker #покер #иннер #innerpsy Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 11
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
dont_copy_highstakes_at_micro
Don't — the whole hand is high-stakes logic (range protection, polar barrels, blocker calls) that undercollects or spews at micro. Adjust to the pool instead; copying GTO/streams can ruin your results.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: don't copy high-stakes lines at micro
Условие: Tempted to copy a high-stakes line (turn check, turn raise, thin river call) at micro.
Обоснование автора: Micro pools are capped, straightforward and under-bluffing, so high-stakes balance misfires.
Review: Не проверено
-
why_highstakes_checks_marginal_turn
High-stakes turn barrels are polar (overbets pressure the capped BB range); a marginal hand (AQ, blocked by BB's A7/A5/AJ) doesn't fit, and the PFR protects his checking range to bluff-catch / have SDV after check-check.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: why high-stakes checks a marginal turn made hand
Условие: Context: PFR checks AQ on A-7-5-J at high stakes.
Обоснование автора: Polar barreling plus range protection explain the check that micro pools don't share.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Value & river discipline at micro (inelastic range, overfold)
-
micro_turn_is_straightforward
Micro regs play straight: they barrel ALL good hands (TPGK/sets/2pair, nothing checked) and check what they can't bet (weak-kicker pairs, 2nd/3rd pairs, weak draws). So a turn CHECK = capped/weak; a turn BARREL = believe it (fold marginal).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: micro turn is straightforward
Условие: A micro reg acts on the turn after a wide flop c-bet.
Обоснование автора: No range protection at micro means the turn action transparently splits strong vs weak.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Value & river discipline at micro (inelastic range, overfold)
-
value_big_vs_inelastic_range
The PFR's calling range is INELASTIC — he calls the same range vs 1/2, 2/3, 3/4. Size value BIG (3/4), never 1/2-2/3: a smaller bet catastrophically undercollects (5-7bb/spot x thousands = buyins).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: value big into an inelastic range
Условие: BB betting the river after the PFR c-bet the flop and checked the turn.
Обоснование автора: If call frequency is flat across sizes, only the bigger size matters for value.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Value & river discipline at micro (inelastic range, overfold)
-
or_use_extremes_tiny_or_big
Use an extreme: 3/4 OR a tiny 1/4-1/3 (to milk 2nd/3rd pairs and induce a raise when he has few top pairs). Avoid the middle (1/2-2/3) which gets neither.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: or use extremes
Условие: Villain's river range has few top pairs / is heterogeneous.
Обоснование автора: On a heterogeneous range extremes maximize either volume or value, the middle neither.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Value & river discipline at micro (inelastic range, overfold)
-
avoid_overbets_at_micro
Don't overbet: the pool has little bluff-catch tolerance, so an overbet folds out his capped range (weak top pairs, 2nd pairs) and undercollects. Overbet only vs a known station with history.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: avoid river overbets at micro
Условие: Considering an overbet on the river vs a micro pool.
Обоснование автора: An overbet only gets paid by hands that also call 3/4, so it just folds out value.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Value & river discipline at micro (inelastic range, overfold)
-
bluff_three_quarters_with_busted_hands
Bet 3/4 with all busted hands: fold-to-bet after a c-bet-then-check line is 50-60% at micro, and required equity at 3/4 is 43% -> auto-profit. Simplify: 3/4 with every bluff.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: bluff 3/4 with busted hands
Условие: BB with a busted hand on the river after cbet-then-check from the PFR.
Обоснование автора: Overfolding lines make a 3/4 bluff auto-profitable.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Value & river discipline at micro (inelastic range, overfold)
-
checkfold_weak_sdv_river
Check-fold weak showdown value — don't turn it into a bluff. If villain bets it's thin value; check-fold (or rarely check-raise only vs nits). You already bet a big value+bluff range, so this suffices.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: check-fold weak SDV on the river
Условие: BB with 2nd/3rd pair on the river.
Обоснование автора: Weak showdown value realizes best passively; betting it only gets called by better.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Value & river discipline at micro (inelastic range, overfold)
-
micro_range_cbet_flop_simplify
Simplify to a range c-bet 1/3, betting often — don't mix sizings like high stakes. The wide small c-bet prints against overfolding pools.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: range-c-bet 1/3 at micro
Условие: PFR on a good flop (AQ on A-7-5) at micro.
Обоснование автора: A single small sizing captures the EV without high-stakes sizing games.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Value & river discipline at micro (inelastic range, overfold)
-
concrete_malinovsky_thin_river_call_dubious
Dubious: given Inner's background (shot-taking under a fish) and how low-frequency that bluff line is (pool research: almost never a bluff), the call is -EV. At micro you'd just CALL the river and NEVER turn-raise AQ (no worse pays, no fold equity vs a capped strong range).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Malinovsky's thin river call is dubious
Условие: Malinovsky calls the river with AQ (KQ blocker) vs Inner's check-call-bet-3bet line.
Обоснование автора: A near-bluffless low-frequency line makes the blocker call and the turn raise both -EV.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Value & river discipline at micro (inelastic range, overfold)
-
micro_river_summary_value_big_bluff_big_checkfold
Value BIG (3/4) into inelastic ranges, bluff 3/4 with busted hands into overfolders, check-fold weak SDV, and never manufacture expensive bluffs. It's the opposite of copying high-stakes balance.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: micro BB-river summary
Условие: Overall BB-vs-open river approach at micro.
Обоснование автора: Straightforward exploit sizing beats high-stakes balance against a capped, overfolding pool.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Value & river discipline at micro (inelastic range, overfold)
2 совета по игре против непонятных линий в покере. Соратник MrBeast-а попал под рейз ривера! Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
two_red_flags_for_folding_vs_weird_lines
Two factors push toward folding: (1) the line is complex/atypical for this opponent, and (2) it contains big sizings. Both together = strong fold signal.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: two red-flag factors
Условие: Facing a strange, hard-to-read line.
Обоснование автора: Complexity plus expense is far more often a made hand than a manufactured bluff.
Review: Не проверено
-
factor_atypical_line
Treat the atypical line itself as a fold signal — think hard about passing.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 1: atypical line
Условие: Villain takes an atypical line (call flop OOP, small turn, then river raise) instead of the obvious raise earlier.
Обоснование автора: Opponents rarely construct convoluted bluff lines; the deviation usually hides value.
Review: Не проверено
-
factor_big_sizings
Big sizings inside a strange line strengthen the fold; cheap weird lines are far more often light than expensive ones.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: factor 2: big sizings
Условие: The weird line contains overbets/jams/large raises.
Обоснование автора: Bluffs prefer cheap execution; a strange AND costly line skews to value.
Review: Не проверено
-
q1_could_villain_bluff_simpler_cheaper
Ask: could villain have bluffed with a simpler, cheaper, more obvious line? If yes -> he's probably NOT bluffing; multi-tabling regs don't invent complex expensive bluffs. Fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: Q1: could villain bluff more simply/cheaply?
Условие: Deciding whether a weird expensive line is a bluff.
Обоснование автора: A rational bluffer takes the cheapest credible route; skipping it implies value.
Review: Не проверено
-
q2_does_villain_have_lots_of_value
If the line holds a lot of value (slowplayed strong hands, backdoor draws that got there and now raise) -> fold. Exception: if there's very little value -> you can call; little value is the main reason to bluff-catch (the less value, the easier the call).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: Q2: how much value does the line hold?
Условие: Assessing villain's value combos in the line (slowplays, completed backdoor draws).
Обоснование автора: Bluff-catching profits when value is scarce; abundant value makes the call -EV.
Review: Не проверено
-
q3_do_you_rep_many_strong_hands
Ask how villain sees you: if you rep MANY strong value hands and he still presses/raises, he almost certainly isn't bluffing -> fold.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: Q3: do you rep strong hands in villain's eyes?
Условие: Villain keeps giving action into your strong-looking range.
Обоснование автора: Bluffing into a range full of strong hands is illogical, so his action is value.
Review: Не проверено
-
practical_sticky_note_and_exception
Put a sticky note (Q1: 'could he bluff cheaper/simpler? if yes -> fold') on your monitor. Always still evaluate villain's range and board texture — every rule has exceptions.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: make it a habit
Условие: Playing long sessions / B-game where you forget the questions.
Обоснование автора: A visible reminder catches the leak when tilt or fatigue erodes discipline.
Review: Не проверено
-
concrete_yasu_JTs_should_fold_river_raise
Fold: Filatov cheaply slow-played a backdoor flush that completed; all three questions point to fold (he could bluff cheaper, his line is value-heavy, Yasu reps many BDFDs). The call was a leak.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: concrete: Yasu JTs 2nd pair should fold the river raise
Условие: Yasu JTs on K-2-7-9-4 (two diamonds), 2nd pair + BDFD, bets ~1/2 river; Filatov check-raises big.
Обоснование автора: A completed slow-played flush arriving via a weird expensive raise dominates a bluff-catcher.
Review: Не проверено
Cолверные эксплойты BvB на основе ресерчей BU vs BB и BB vs BU. Targeted pass Извлечено 8/10
Перечисленные правила 8
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
flop_range_cbet_exploit
Range c-bet ~75% pot at near-100% frequency, betting the whole range including weak/air hands as bluffs; the population overfolds, so one large sizing is highest-EV.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: BU flop c-bet vs BB (single-raised pot, IP aggressor)
Условие: Hero is the preflop raiser IP (BTN) vs BB in an SRP, checked to on the flop, vs a population/reg that overfolds to c-bets (fold-to-cbet ~40-51%).
Обоснование автора: Vs a high-fold population a single 75% range-bet realizes fold equity across the whole range; derived from population research node-locked in a solver.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
flop_checkback_medium_sdv
Check back — realizes enough equity by checking, gets little value (better calls / worse folds), and protects the checking range; do not blindly range-bet these.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: BU flop check-back of medium/weak top pair with backdoors
Условие: On the flop as IP raiser, holding a medium/weak top pair with a backdoor and showdown value (e.g. T8/T7 type), indifferent between betting and checking.
Обоснование автора: Exception to the flop range-bet: SDV hands prefer to realize equity in a check.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
turn_polar_overbet_capped
Overbet ~125% pot polarized (value + air) for max fold equity — BB is capped and overfolds this node.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: BU turn overbet on street-completing scare cards
Условие: After c-betting the flop, on a turn that completes straights or is a high scary card (Q/J), where BB's range is capped (nut hands went to a flop raise).
Обоснование автора: Because value went to a flop raise, BB cannot have many nuts on the turn -> overbet is safe and high-pressure.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
turn_check_bb_favoring
Check (do not barrel) — BB now holds more nuts relative to hero; barreling loses value and gets raised.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: BU turn check on BB-favoring textures
Условие: On turns that improve BB's range relative to hero — middling/straighty cards (9, J on connected boards) and paired boards where BB's nut share grows above hero's.
Обоснование автора: Relative nut advantage shifts to BB on these cards, so the aggressor checks rather than barrels.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
river_wide_barrel_exploit
Barrel wide — continue betting almost everything except the weakest hands that beat a bluff-catcher; prefer flush-blocker bluffs (Kx of the flush suit).
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: BU river barrel wide vs population overfold
Условие: River after flop 75% + turn barrel, vs a population that overfolds the river (~61% fold to an overbet vs ~50% GTO).
Обоснование автора: Population river overfold makes a wide finished-bluff barrel +EV; blockers to villain's continues improve bluffs.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
giveup_vs_wide_caller
Down-shift / give up vs that villain and write a note that they call wide — the exploit is population-conditional; deviate when a player deviates.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: Stop the barrel exploit vs a villain who calls down wide
Условие: A specific villain shows up calling barrels/overbets with 2nd/3rd pair or off-color hands (i.e., not overfolding like the population).
Обоснование автора: The barrel line is an exploit of overfolding; against a demonstrated wide caller it loses money.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
method_solver_exploit_via_research
Derive villain's real sizing-spectrum composition from population research (large-sample e.g. 40M hands), node-lock it into a solver, and play the solver's exploit response; pick ONE line that differs from the field and master it.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: Solver-exploit method: population research + node-lock
Условие: Building an exploit strategy against the field rather than copying GTO.
Обоснование автора: GTO copying fails because real opponents deviate; node-locking researched spectra yields the true exploit.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
flop_multisizing_polarization
Polarize sizings: nuts (sets/two-pair) to a small size (~33%) to induce raises/keep villain in; no-equity air to an overbet (~125%) for max fold equity. Author prefers a single 75% range-bet for simplicity/mastery.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: BU flop multi-sizing: nuts small, air overbet
Условие: If using multiple sizings on the flop as IP raiser instead of a single range-bet.
Обоснование автора: Small with nuts induces the frequent raises; overbet with air maximizes folds — but mono-75% is simpler to master.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
Where Poker Players BLUFF Too Much… And Where They NEVER Bluff Частично 6/10
Есть ограничение
- Ограничение источника: en-orig captions plus official YouTube storyboard; full video retrieval failed HTTP 403
Перечисленные правила 16
Это кандидатные формулировки из источника, а не автоматически правильные ответы для тренажера. Текст показан без машинного перевода, чтобы не исказить смысл.
-
delayed_turn_raise_underbluffed
Treat the delayed turn raise as strongly value-weighted and overfold bluff-catchers unless there is a concrete contrary read.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: preflop raiser checks back flop; defender bets turn; raiser raises
Условие: The preflop raiser declined a flop c-bet and then raises the defender's turn probe.
Обоснование автора: The flop check-back retains showdown value and traps; live players seldom convert enough showdown-value hands into turn raise bluffs to balance the value region.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
small_river_third_barrel_underbluffed
Do not assume the small price means many bluffs; overfold marginal bluff-catchers. If the range is capped and the hand has no call value, a bluff-raise may be better than a call, but it is an advanced exception.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: preflop raiser bets flop, turn and small on river
Условие: An in-position preflop raiser fires a third barrel but chooses about one-third pot on the river.
Обоснование автора: The source says this sizing is commonly thin or medium value; the live pool does not supply enough triple-barrel bluffs, while the small size can expose a capped value region.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
early_position_ace_high_triple_barrel_underbluffed
Overfold one-pair bluff-catchers without an opponent-specific reason to expect the required river bluffs.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: early-position preflop raiser triple-barrels an ace-high runout
Условие: A tight early-position range continues betting all three streets on an ace-high board.
Обоснование автора: Balanced play needs unintuitive bluffs, including some pairs converted into bluffs. The source argues live players miss these combinations and may instead overbet thin one-pair value.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
river_lead_after_turn_overbet_call_underbluffed
Treat the lead as heavily value-weighted, most often the completed draw, and fold non-nut bluff-catchers. Do not transfer this claim to a small block lead.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero bets flop; hero overbets turn; out-of-position caller calls; nut-changing river; caller leads medium or large
Условие: After calling sustained aggression including a turn overbet, the out-of-position player leads medium or large when the river completes the obvious nuts.
Обоснование автора: The caller has absorbed repeated aggression and then chooses to lead on the nut-changing card. The source says live players seldom find enough bluffs in this high-friction branch; small leads can represent a different blockish range.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
multiway_flop_lead_underbluffed
Weight the lead toward strong but vulnerable made hands and high-equity draws; overfold marginal overpairs rather than assuming a balanced bluff region.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: a caller leads into multiple players on the flop
Условие: A player donk-bets a multiway flop, especially after cold-calling a three-bet preflop.
Обоснование автора: Leading into several uncapped ranges requires more strength, and the source says the live pool rarely manufactures enough multiway bluffs. The cold-call-three-bet branch is described as still stronger.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
late_street_check_raise_underbluffed
Make a large exploitative fold with one-pair hands unless a concrete read establishes late-street bluff check-raises.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: hero has shown repeated aggression; opponent check-raises turn or river
Условие: An opponent check-raises after Hero has already represented strength with repeated betting.
Обоснование автора: The source treats the extra decision to raise into sustained aggression as a severe live underbluff node, commonly concentrated around the nuts.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
multiway_checked_to_river_stab_underbluffed
Fold marginal showdown value more than the attractive price suggests unless the bettor has demonstrated delayed river bluffs.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: multiway pot checks through flop and turn; a player bets river
Условие: Several players decline earlier betting opportunities and one finally stabs the river.
Обоснование автора: Natural bluffs had earlier chances to bet. The source says players who wait through several multiway checks generally fail to find enough river bluffs.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
large_flop_cbet_underbluffed
Treat the range as too strong and overfold marginal continues until the player shows large flop bluffs.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: preflop raiser makes a large or pot-sized flop continuation bet
Условие: The preflop raiser uses a large flop c-bet rather than the common small range size.
Обоснование автора: The source argues live players choose this costly flop size with an unbalanced strength concentration and fail to supply the theoretical bluffs.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
small_heads_up_flop_donk_overbluffed
Continue widely with made hands and bluffs; prefer calls that retain the weak range and attack later over an automatic immediate raise.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: out-of-position defender leads small into the preflop raiser
Условие: A heads-up flop donk uses a small size.
Обоснование автора: The source says this small lead contains too much weak material. Immediate raising can make that material fold, while calls preserve later-street exploitation.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
wide_range_flop_cbet_overbluffed
Add bluff check-raises with hands that lack showdown value; do not respond as if the c-bet range were tight.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: preflop raiser c-bets a wide-versus-wide flop configuration
Условие: Both ranges reach the flop wide, such as cutoff versus button, and the preflop aggressor continuation-bets too much.
Обоснование автора: Wide ranges create more air. The source says live players c-bet these nodes too automatically, leaving an overbluffed betting range that can be punished by low-showdown-value raises.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
small_turn_probe_half_pot_river_overbluffed
Call down linearly with appropriate pairs; do not replace them with flashy high-card bluff-catchers.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: preflop raiser checks back flop; defender stabs small on turn and about half pot on river
Условие: After the preflop raiser checks back, the out-of-position defender uses a small turn probe followed by a medium river bet.
Обоснование автора: The source says the defender attacks the visible weakness with too much air. Pair classes retain direct showdown value and form a simpler, more reliable calling region than unpaired blockers.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
ip_stab_after_pfr_checks_flop_overbluffed
Protect the check range and bluff-catch more widely against the in-position stab instead of treating every check as surrender.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: out-of-position preflop raiser checks flop; in-position caller bets
Условие: The preflop raiser checks to an in-position caller on the flop.
Обоснование автора: The source says in-position callers over-attack this apparent weakness. A range-protecting check strategy leaves enough strong and medium hands to continue.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
ace_turn_double_barrel_overbluffed_then_river_underbluffed
Continue the turn more widely with suitable pairs and draws, but do not automatically call a third river barrel: the source expects many turn bluffs to give up and the river barrel to become underbluffed.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: preflop raiser c-bets flop and barrels an ace turn
Условие: In a wide single-raised pot, the preflop raiser continues on an ace turn.
Обоснование автора: The ace is an intuitive scare card and gets over-barreled. Live players then fail to complete enough of those bluffs on the river, so the exploit changes by street.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
delayed_ip_turn_stab_overbluffed
Add bluff check-raises with no-showdown-value hands and defend made hands; the stab is wider than a pure value range.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: out-of-position preflop raiser checks flop and blank turn; in-position caller stabs turn
Условие: After two checks from the out-of-position preflop raiser, the in-position caller bets a turn that does not materially change the board.
Обоснование автора: The source says the in-position player bets both air and showdown-value hands for protection when checked to twice, producing a weak, linear and over-wide stab range.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
small_river_lead_after_turn_checkback_overbluffed
Call widely with appropriate showdown value. This source claim is limited to the small lead; it does not classify a pot-sized lead in the same action path.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: button c-bets small; big blind calls; turn checks through; big blind leads small on river
Условие: After the in-position preflop raiser c-bets flop and checks back turn, the out-of-position caller uses a small river lead.
Обоснование автора: The defender reaches the river wide, stronger flop hands often raised earlier, weak flop calls remain, and strong river value is expected to size larger. The source therefore assigns too many bluffs to the small sizing only.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
-
small_cbet_dynamic_flop_overbluffed
Continue more widely with showdown value and raise some no-showdown-value hands as bluffs. Do not use the same sizing inference on a static dry board.
Контекст и происхождение
Линия: preflop raiser c-bets small on a wet dynamic flop
Условие: The board is genuinely dynamic and draw-heavy, yet the preflop raiser uses a small flop size.
Обоснование автора: On a board where strong hands normally want protection and pot growth, the source interprets the small size as weak and over-wide. On dry static textures, a small range bet is normal and carries much less information.
Review: Не проверено
Кластер: Не включено в кластер
Dangerously Honest Poker Advice to Make More Money in 39 Minutes Очередь 0/10
How I'd Make $100k in Poker in 2026, if I Had to Start Over Очередь 0/10
What Actually Makes Poker Players $100k+ (It’s Not Strategy) Очередь 0/10
How the Top 1% of Poker Players Exploit Anyone After Just One Showdown Очередь 0/10
Why Huge Crushers Stick It In Slowly (Even When It’s...Deep) Очередь 0/10
How the Best Poker Player I Know Made $100k+ a Month in Private Games Очередь 0/10
I Gave an American Pro and a Euro Pro the Same 6 Hands Очередь 0/10
4 Amateur Poker Players vs 1 Secret Pro Очередь 0/10
I Gave a Live Pro and an Online Wizard the Same 6 Hands Очередь 0/10
This Poker Strategy Should Be ILLEGAL (It's Not) Очередь 0/10
I Made a 20 Question Multiway Quiz. Most Poker Players Fail. Очередь 0/10
How I’d Move Up in Stakes (Without Losing My Bankroll) Очередь 0/10
I Watched Him "Play Poker" 20+ Hours. Here's Exactly How to Beat Him. Очередь 0/10
Which Poker Player Makes the Most Money? Очередь 0/10
I Ranked 10 Poker Creators. Most of Them Won't Like It. Очередь 0/10
I Watched Players Think Out Loud. They All Make the Same Mistake. Очередь 0/10
I Gave a Weekend Warrior and a Full Time Pro the Same 5 Hands Очередь 0/10
I Watched Players Think Out Loud. They All Have the Same Blindspot. Очередь 0/10
8 Lessons Poker Taught Me That Made Me Millions Очередь 0/10
How I'd Exploit Any Player After Just a Couple Hands Очередь 0/10
We Coached 700 Players. One Trait Separated the Winners. Очередь 0/10
Can a $1/2 Player Hang With a High Stakes Wizard? Очередь 0/10
This Blind Spot Keeps Winning Players at Low Stakes Очередь 0/10
I Played 100 Hours at Low Stakes. Something's Different. Очередь 0/10
What High Stakes Pros See That Low Stakes Players Miss Очередь 0/10
Live Poker Preflop Guide (2026) Очередь 0/10
I Tried to Go All-In More Than My Entire Table Combined Очередь 0/10
Low Stakes Has Changed for 2026. Most Players Won't Adapt. Очередь 0/10
This Mistake Cost Me $1 Million. Almost Everyone Makes It. Очередь 0/10
Why I don't care if I win (and why you shouldn't either) Очередь 0/10
I Played Poker With ONLY Tiny and Massive Bets Очередь 0/10
How I'd Make $50k in Poker, if I Had a Full-Time Job Очередь 0/10
I played poker with only 5 seconds to make EVERY decision Очередь 0/10
Everything You Think Matters in Poker…Doesn't Очередь 0/10
I Told My Opponents My EXACT Strategy (it didn’t matter) Очередь 0/10
The 9 Player Types You’ll See Everywhere (and How to Exploit Them) Очередь 0/10
I Played Poker Without Looking At My Cards Очередь 0/10
I Gave a $5M Poker Pro 10 Seconds to Make Perfect Decisions Очередь 0/10
90% of Money Is Won on the River (The System That Fixes Your Winrate) Очередь 0/10
I Tried Playing Perfect GTO at Low Stakes (It didn’t go how you think) Очередь 0/10
40+ Poker Tells That Give Away Everything Очередь 0/10
I watched 100+ hours of Phil Hellmuth. Is he ACTUALLY good at poker? Очередь 0/10
I’ll Tell You My Exact Strategy. You Still Can’t Exploit Me Очередь 0/10
I watched 100+ hours of Alan Keating. He’s not who you think he is. Очередь 0/10
10 Mistakes Keeping Players Stuck at Low Stakes Очередь 0/10
95% of Pots Are Multiway (The System That Fixes Your Winrate) Очередь 0/10
I Bet My Future on Making $10k/Mo Playing Poker — The Real Numbers | Ep 26 Очередь 0/10
Stop Wasting Time Reviewing Hands (Do This Instead) Очередь 0/10
Can You Make $10K/Month Playing Poker? I Finally Know | Ep 25 Очередь 0/10
Can You Beat a Poker Pro? 99% Fail This Quiz Очередь 0/10
$75,000 in Front of Me. Thousands Watching. No Turning Back. | Ep 24 Очередь 0/10
I watched 100+ hrs of high stakes pros. Here's how they win millions. Очередь 0/10
Bay Area Broke Me. I Had One Session to Fix Everything. | Ep 23 Очередь 0/10
Most Players Use This Bet Size... It's KILLING Your Win Rate Очередь 0/10
Something Strange is Happening at Bay Area Poker Tables | Ep 22 Очередь 0/10
Is Charlie Carrel REALLY That Good? (I Watched Every Hand) Очередь 0/10
Everyone at This Table Was Rich… Except Me | Ep 21 Очередь 0/10
You're Sizing Bets WRONG. Here's the Simple Fix. Очередь 0/10
I Lost $6K in Florida... Then This Happened | Ep 20 Очередь 0/10
Smart Poker Players Keep Losing — Here’s Why Очередь 0/10
My Worst Poker Loss EVER. It Changed Everything | Ep 19 Очередь 0/10
The Players You NEED to Bluff (Most People Get It Backwards) Очередь 0/10
NOTHING Could Have Prepared Me for This Session | Ep 18 Очередь 0/10
15 “Stupid” Poker Plays That Actually Make You Rich Очередь 0/10
Florida Poker Broke My Brain | Ep 17 Очередь 0/10
Florida Poker Is COMPLETE MADNESS | Ep 16 Очередь 0/10
If You Can't Do This, You'll NEVER Beat Live Poker Очередь 0/10
Everyone Said Texas Poker Was Easy. They Were WRONG. | Ep 15 Очередь 0/10
The Poker Skill 99% of Players Don’t Have Очередь 0/10
Texas Poker Is a GOLDMINE (And I'm Cashing In) | Ep 14 Очередь 0/10
This Poker Pro Makes $150/hr… But STILL Plays Like This?! Очередь 0/10
The TRUTH About Texas Poker (Here’s What Surprised Me) | Ep 13 Очередь 0/10
They Thought I Was Tight. I Made $1M Bluffing Them Blind. Очередь 0/10
How I Cracked the Code on Texas Poker | Ep 12 Очередь 0/10
This Poker Player Is BLEEDING Money — Here's How We Stopped It Очередь 0/10
My First Texas Poker Session Ever… And It Ends in CHAOS | Ep 11 Очередь 0/10
This ONE Skill Makes Poker Feel Like Cheating Очередь 0/10
Vegas Poker Is HELL — Can Anyone Make $10K/Month Here? | Ep 10 Очередь 0/10
We Built Her a $100k/Year Poker Plan in 46 Minutes Очередь 0/10
My Poker Dream Was Dead… Until THIS Session | Ep 9 Очередь 0/10
How I’d Make $1 Million in Poker, if I Had to Start Over Очередь 0/10
This Wasn’t Supposed to Happen… The Struggle to $10k/Month | Ep 8 Очередь 0/10
The 3 Questions That Make Poker Feel EASY (Even Out of Position) Очередь 0/10
From UNSTOPPABLE to PUNISHED: What Poker Did To Me... | Ep 7 Очередь 0/10
We Trained a Poker Pro for 28 Days - Did We Make Him Better? Очередь 0/10
I Left Everything Behind to Play Poker… My First Month’s RESULTS | Ep 6 Очередь 0/10
The Bet Sizing Mistake That’s Costing You BIG Очередь 0/10
$10k/Month Playing Poker? Hunting for the FISHIEST Games | Ep 5 Очередь 0/10
Why 'Good' Poker Players Actually Suck (And How to Beat Them) Очередь 0/10
$10K/Month Playing Poker? BIGGEST Difference Between Asia & America | Ep 4 Очередь 0/10
99% of Players FAIL This Poker IQ Test Очередь 0/10
I Left Hong Kong to Play Poker… And It Cost Me Everything | Ep 3 Очередь 0/10
Want to Lose at Poker? Do This Очередь 0/10
$10k/Month Playing Poker? LA Games Are INSANE! | Ep 2 Очередь 0/10
Short vs. Deep Stack: The Huge Adjustment You’re Missing Очередь 0/10
Can I Make $10k/Month Playing Poker? I Left Hong Kong to Find Out | Ep 1 Очередь 0/10
If Your Bankroll Is Under $10k, Watch This NOW Очередь 0/10
Ask THESE 3 Questions to Make $100/hr in Poker Очередь 0/10
This Poker Strategy Feels ILLEGAL (It's THAT Powerful) Очередь 0/10
Exploit Any Poker Player Instantly When You See THIS Очередь 0/10
What High Stakes Pros Know That Low Stakes Players Don’t (Round 2) Очередь 0/10
This Secret Turns Poker Players Into CRUSHERS Очередь 0/10
The Truth About Low Stakes Poker in 2025 (My Results) Очередь 0/10
$100/hr at Low Stakes: The Final Episode Очередь 0/10
Why Playing ‘Crazy’ Might Be Safer Than You Think Очередь 0/10
$100/hr at Low Stakes: Was It Worth It? | Ep 18 Очередь 0/10
What High Stakes Pros Know That Low Stakes Players Don’t Очередь 0/10
The Truth About My Low Stakes Challenge | Ep 17 Очередь 0/10
The 9 Biggest Mistakes Low Stakes Poker Pros Make Очередь 0/10
One Bad Session and I’m Homeless - My Marriage Is on the Line | Ep 16 Очередь 0/10
Low Stakes Players Have FIGURED ME OUT - Now What?! Очередь 0/10
Game Over? My Strategy Has Been EXPOSED | Ep 15 Очередь 0/10
My Bankroll Exploded When I Started Doing THIS Очередь 0/10
I Am SUN RUNNING At Low Stakes Poker | Ep 14 Очередь 0/10
How I’d Make $100k in Poker, if I Had to Start Over Очередь 0/10
I’m The KING of Low Stakes Poker | Ep 13 Очередь 0/10
Why Bluffing Is SO GOOD At Low Stakes (The HIDDEN Reason) Очередь 0/10
$100/hr at Low Stakes? Poker Gods REWARD Me Again! | Ep 12 Очередь 0/10
I Was WRONG About Low Stakes Poker Очередь 0/10
$100/hr at Low Stakes? High Stakes CRUSHER Weighs In | Ep 11 Очередь 0/10
I Discovered Why Poker Players Get STUCK at Low Stakes Очередь 0/10
$100/hr at Low Stakes? MONSTER SESSION Gets Me Back On Track | Ep 10 Очередь 0/10
This Poker Disease Is DESTROYING Bankrolls Очередь 0/10
$100/hr at LOW STAKES? I Asked the Man Who Plays Poker’s BIGGEST Games | Ep 9 Очередь 0/10
There Are No Good Players in Live Poker Очередь 0/10
I Can't Stop LYING at the Poker Table | Ep 8 Очередь 0/10
Everything They Told You About Poker Is a LIE Очередь 0/10
They Just Keep GIVING Me Money | Ep 7 Очередь 0/10
Here's Why Your Bluffs Aren't Working Очередь 0/10
$100/hr at LOW STAKES? Mariano weighs in | Ep 6 Очередь 0/10
Four "FISHY" Poker Plays That Actually PRINT Очередь 0/10
I Made My Poker Table FURIOUS….and I Don’t Regret It! | Ep 5 Очередь 0/10
You're Betting the WRONG Size (Here's Why!) Очередь 0/10
The Hand That Changed EVERYTHING | Ep 4 Очередь 0/10
Does GTO Matter at Low Stakes? The Surprising Truth Очередь 0/10
$100/hr at LOW STAKES? Brad Owen Weighs In! | Ep 3 Очередь 0/10
4 Step Guide to Become a Poker CRUSHER Очередь 0/10
These Hands Are INSANE (I'm Not on Drugs!) | Ep 2 Очередь 0/10
How to TRIPLE Your Win Rate (Poker Secrets REVEALED) Очередь 0/10
$100/hr at LOW STAKES Poker?! | Ep 1 Очередь 0/10
You’re Playing 3-Bet Pots WRONG (Here’s Why) Очередь 0/10
STOP Making This Poker Mistake (Fix This and PROFIT!) Очередь 0/10
ESCAPE Low Stakes Poker: 4 Mistakes Keeping You Trapped Очередь 0/10
RUN OVER Your Poker Table With OVER BETS (Easy Guide!) Очередь 0/10
The Most PROFITABLE Play in Poker (Do This and PRINT) Очередь 0/10
5 UNDER BLUFFED Spots in Poker (Just FOLD!) Очередь 0/10
How to Make Perfect READS in Live Poker Очередь 0/10
When to Turn Bluff Catchers Into BLUFFS (Simple Guide) Очередь 0/10
How to Use a Solver to CRUSH Low Stakes Poker Очередь 0/10
This MISTAKE is Keeping You Stuck at Low Stakes Очередь 0/10
Top 5 Spots To Go HUGE With Value Очередь 0/10
Don't Make These 5 Bluffing MISTAKES Очередь 0/10
Top 5 Spots to BLUFF in Live Poker Очередь 0/10
Fish vs Pro: One Hand, Two Strategies Очередь 0/10
How to Exploit EVERY Player at Your Table Очередь 0/10
Why Your River Bluff & Value Sizes Should NOT Be the Same Очередь 0/10
Live Poker PREFLOP BIBLE Очередь 0/10
5 Poker Tips for My Younger Self Очередь 0/10
Poker Fundamentals: MULTIWAY POTS Очередь 0/10
How to PUNISH Poker Pros (4 Step Guide) Очередь 0/10
BLUFF BUSTING: Catch Bluffs Like a Poker Pro (5 Step Guide) Очередь 0/10
Playing Poker OUT OF POSITION: The Ultimate Guide (2024) Очередь 0/10
Poker Bet Sizing Hack: ONE QUESTION to Rule Them All Очередь 0/10
GTO Poker Strategy Exposed: Why It's KILLING Your Win Rate Очередь 0/10
5 Step Guide to CRUSH Low Stakes Poker (2025) Очередь 0/10
What Poker Players Earn Vs What They COULD Be Earning Очередь 0/10
don't fold SETS to this guy! Очередь 0/10
avoid this poker pitfall when bluffing (DON’T do this!) Очередь 0/10
this is a BIG BOY BLUFF Очередь 0/10
mariano made a BIG mistake (how to avoid this poker blunder) Очередь 0/10
how to PRINT $$ when bluffing (even against calling stations) Очередь 0/10
is THIS the best poker bluff ever? Очередь 0/10
is this rampage's BIGGEST punt? Очередь 0/10
$25k decision: would you check back a FLUSH? Очередь 0/10
folding TRIPS for $20k? Очередь 0/10
did i make a $25k mistake? Очередь 0/10
can mariano catch a $70k punt? Очередь 0/10
how to punish a poker vlogger Очередь 0/10
the 10 best players on hustler casino live (FANTASY DRAFT) Очередь 0/10
2 simple tricks to crush recreational poker players Очередь 0/10
private games are killing poker (but not the ones you think) Очередь 0/10
solvers are making you worse at poker... Очередь 0/10
can 2 poker pros turn 15 losing players into winners? Очередь 0/10
Почему большинство видео не обработано полностью
Реестр канала одновременно служит каталогом будущей работы. Поэтому наличие строки не означает начало обработки. Извлечение правил и их последующий тематический review — отдельные этапы.
Что означают статусы и цифры
Статусы рассчитаны по десяти шагам из Video Processing SOP и сверены с обязательными файлами, review и кластерами.
250 видео
63 PokerAbility и 187 Hungry Horse. Backlog не равен завершённой работе.
650 candidate rules
638 привязаны к 67 видео; 12 получены из отдельной таблицы.
242 reviews
Столько правил имеют review-запись; это не автоматическое повышение до Evidence.
562 clustered rules
Столько правил включено хотя бы в один кластер; cluster не означает trainer-ready.
Полные видеофайлы локально: 0. Transcript-first workflow обычно хранит metadata + captions. Targeted pass: 7. Подробнее: processed review workflow.
Термины и визуальная система
- Backlog / реестр
- Каталог источников и очередь работы. Запись не доказывает обработку.
- Candidate rule
- Тезис из источника, ещё не безусловная рекомендация коуча.
- Review overlay
- Оценка применимости, контекста, конфликтов и готовности правила.
- Cluster
- Тематическое объединение правил с provenance; не равно «правильный ответ».
- Targeted pass
- Разбор выбранных обучающих сегментов длинного источника.
- Normalized Evidence
- Структурированное доказательство с явно заданной областью применимости.
Развитие ссылок, provenance, тезауруса и диаграмм: TODO визуальной системы.